The Effect of a New Approach to Group Work on Pupil-Pupil and Teacher-Pupil Interactions.

The main impetus for the SPRinG (social pedagogic research into grouping) project was to address the wide gap between the potential of group work and its limited use in schools. It is an ambitious project that developed key principles and strategies to improve the effectiveness of group work in everyday primary classes and across a whole school year. On-the-spot and video-based systematic observations showed more active, sustained engagement, more connectedness, and more higher order inferential joint reasoning within SPRinG groups than in control comparisons. The authors argue that group work can be successfully implemented into everyday school classrooms and improve pupil interactions, provided teachers take time to train pupils in the skills of group working.

[1]  R. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative Learning and Achievement: Theory and Research , 2003 .

[2]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argument in school science , 2001 .

[3]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Rethinking Collaborative Learning , 2001 .

[4]  N. Webb,et al.  Promoting Helping Behavior in Cooperative Small Groups in Middle School Mathematics , 1994 .

[5]  R. Gillies.  Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms , 2003 .

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[7]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  The effects of adult guidance and peer discussion on the development of children's representations: evidence from the training of pedestrian skills. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[8]  A. Karmiloff-Smith.  Précis of Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  Stuart O. Yager,et al.  The Impact of Group Processing on Achievement in Cooperative Learning Groups , 1986 .

[10]  D. Wood.  How Children Think and Learn , 1988 .

[11]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school , 2003 .

[12]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The Internal Dynamics of Cooperative Learning Groups , 1985 .

[13]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  New Statistical Methods for Analysing Social Structures: an introduction to multilevel models , 1991 .

[14]  C. Eckerman,et al.  Developmental Trends in the Quality of Conversation Achieved by Small Groups of Acquainted Peers. , 1984 .

[15]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Teachers' and Pupils' Behavior in Large and Small Classes: A Systematic Observation Study of Pupils Aged 10 and 11 Years , 2005 .

[16]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[17]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[18]  N. Mercer,et al.  From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development , 1999 .

[19]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[20]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  The role and effects of teaching assistants in English primary schools (Years 4 to 6) 2000–2003. Results from the Class Size and Pupil–Adult Ratios (CSPAR) KS2 Project , 2004 .

[21]  H. Goldstein.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[22]  P. Kutnick,et al.  Developing group work in everyday classrooms: an introduction to the special issue , 2003 .

[23]  M. Galton,et al.  Group work in the primary classroom , 1992 .

[24]  Neville Bennett,et al.  Managing Classroom Groups , 1995 .

[25]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[26]  P. Kutnick,et al.  Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work , 2003 .

[27]  M. Galton,et al.  Inside the Primary Classroom: 20 Years On , 1999 .

[28]  Shlomo Sharan,et al.  Language and learning in the cooperative classroom , 1988 .

[29]  W. Damon,et al.  Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education , 1989 .

[30]  C. Howe,et al.  Peer Argument in Educational Settings , 2001 .

[31]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning , 1999 .

[32]  J. Brophy.  Classroom Organization and Management , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[33]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn , 1985 .

[34]  Group collaboration effects and the explicitness of children's knowledge , 1998 .

[35]  B. Simon.  Inside the primary classroom , 1980 .

[36]  Betty Wilkinson,et al.  The Quality of Pupil Learning Experiences , 1984 .

[37]  M. Deutsch.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group Process , 1949 .