Latent learning in a Swimming Pool Place Task by Rats: Evidence for the use of Associative and not Cognitive Mapping Processes

Using a latent learning paradigm, the experiments examine two hypotheses of how rats solve place navigation tasks. According to associative theory, experience with all relevant cues is required for accurate navigation. According to cognitive mapping theory, animals can generate novel trajectories from knowledge of spatial relations of objects in the environment. Rats that had been placed on a platform, which was submerged in a pool of opaque water and was moved each day, were tested later for their ability to find the platform using only surrounding room cues. One 30-sec exposure to a platform location was effective in improving performance. Improvement was greatest when tests were given within minutes of placement, but facilitation was obtained for as long as 4 hr. Improved performance was obtained as soon as rats acquired the procedural aspects of the task but did not increase with subsequent practice. Improved performance was also obtained when pre-trained rats were tested in a novel environment. Despite the advantage conferred by exposure to the target platform, test swims were not accurate, placement-induced improvement was not as great as that following a single swimming trial, and placement combined with a swim resulted in best performance. The results suggest that rats use associative learning processes rather than cognitive mapping to solve place problems in a swimming pool.

[1]  C. H. Honzik,et al.  Degrees of hunger, reward and non-reward, and maze learning in rats, and Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats , 1930 .

[2]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[3]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[4]  R. Passingham.  The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Morris.  Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[6]  R J Sutherland,et al.  Being there: a novel demonstration of latent spatial learning in the rat. , 1982, Behavioral and neural biology.

[7]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  Formation of a place learning-set by the rat: A new paradigm for neurobehavioral studies , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  D. Olton,et al.  Rats acquire spatial learning sets. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[9]  I Q Whishaw,et al.  Visits to starts, routes, and places by rats (Rattus norvegicus) in swimming pool navigation tasks. , 1986, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Some limitations on the use of distal cues in place navigation by rats , 1987, Psychobiology.

[11]  J. Keith,et al.  Latent place learning in a novel environment and the influences of prior training in rats , 1988, Psychobiology.

[12]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia , 1989, Psychobiology.

[13]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Latent learning and latent inhibition in maze discriminations , 1989 .

[14]  Failure to Find Latent Spatial Learning in the Morris Water Task: Retraction of Jacobs, Zaborowski, and Whishaw (1989) , 1989 .

[15]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Rats Repeatedly Placed on a Hidden Platform Learn but Quickly Forget Its Location , 1989 .