Prefabricated prostheses for the reconstruction of skull defects.

Cranioplasties using intraoperatively modeled prostheses may fail to create harmonic contours with long-term stability. In contrast, preoperative modeling would allow more sophisticated planning of the contour and better preparation of the implant material, if a sufficiently precise model of the defect-site was available. In this respect, computer aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-techniques based on helical computed tomography (CT) data are successfully used for the prefabrication of prostheses: An individual computer-based 3-dimensional model of the bony defect is generated after acquisition, transfer and evaluation of the CT data; from this freeform surfaces geometry an individual and "idealized" prosthesis-geometry is derived and fabricated by a numerically controlled milling machine using modern industrial CAD/CAM-systems and design software. The margins of this prosthesis-geometry are generated by the borders of the defect and the surface by considering the non-affected neighbouring contours. Cranioplasties in cases of large postsurgical skull defects are presented as the first clinical applications of this new method, which also allows the use of titanium and fabrication of integrated fixation-devices.

[1]  B. Toth,et al.  Computer‐Designed Prostheses for Orbitocranial Reconstruction , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  H Eufinger,et al.  CAD by processing of computed tomography data and CAM of individually designed prostheses. , 1995, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  W. Kalender,et al.  Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. , 1990, Radiology.

[4]  M. Vannier,et al.  The “Third” Dimension in Craniofacial Surgery , 1983, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  B. Guyuron.  The hourglass facial deformity. , 1990, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[6]  M. Macfarlane,et al.  Titanium in reconstructive surgery of the skull and face. , 1990, British journal of plastic surgery.

[7]  E. Morscher.  Die zementlose Fixation von Hüftendoprothesen , 1983 .

[8]  G. H. Weiss,et al.  Cranioplasty: a review of 1030 cases of penetrating head injury. , 1979, Neurosurgery.

[9]  L. Wolford,et al.  Temporomandibular joint reconstruction of the complex patient with the Techmedica custom-made total joint prosthesis. , 1994, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  H Eufinger,et al.  Individual augmentation of the atrophic mandible based on CAD/CAM-manipulated computed tomography data--in vitro results. , 1994, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  B. Nylén,et al.  Bone grafting of skull defects. A report on 55 cases. , 1973, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  E. Kolb,et al.  Application of purified bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) preparations in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery. Reconstruction in craniofacial malformations and post-traumatic or operative defects of the skull with lyophilized cartilage and BMP. , 1994, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[13]  L. Heuser,et al.  CT data acquisition as a basis for modern diagnosis and therapy in maxillofacial surgery. , 1995, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[14]  R. G. Robinson,et al.  Acrylic cranioplasty a simple one‐stage method using a cold curing material , 1954, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  F Brix,et al.  Individual skull model fabrication for craniofacial surgery. , 1990, The Cleft palate journal.