Calibration of hydrological models on hydrologically unusual events

The length of the observation period used for model calibration has a great influence on the identification of the model parameters. In this contribution it is shown that a relatively small number of so called unusual time periods are sufficient to specify the model parameters with the same certainty as using the whole observation period. The unusual events are identified from discharge or precipitation observations series using the statistical concept of data depth. The idea is to distinguish between model states which are covered by previously observed states (interpolation case), and those for which no similar events occurred (extrapolation case). Depth functions are used to identify unusual events from four days lagged discharge or API (antecedent precipitation index) series. Data with low depth are near the boundary of the multivariate set and are thus considered as unusual. The depth is calculated using the observations, their natural logarithms, their rank and their first differences. Model calibration using the selected critical periods is only slightly worse than using all data. The transferability of the parameters for different time periods is equally good as using all the data and significantly better than random selection. Two different models (HBV and HYMOD) are used to demonstrate the methodology for the Neckar catchment in South-West Germany. The methodology developed in this study can be potentially useful for developing monitoring strategies.

[1]  J. Seibert Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm , 2000 .

[2]  R. Moore The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales , 1985 .

[3]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved streamflow forecasts: value of semidistributed modeling , 2001 .

[4]  L. Shawn Matott,et al.  Calibration of complex subsurface reaction models using a surrogate-model approach , 2008 .

[5]  K. Beven Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer , 2012 .

[6]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data , 1996 .

[7]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis , 2003 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed? , 2009 .

[9]  G. Marsily,et al.  Comparison of geostatistical methods for estimating transmissivity using data on transmissivity and specific capacity , 1987 .

[10]  Shailesh Kumar Singh,et al.  Robust parameter estimation in gauged and ungauged basins , 2010 .

[11]  R. Serfling,et al.  General notions of statistical depth function , 2000 .

[12]  C. Perrin,et al.  Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the parameters of rainfall—runoff models , 2007 .

[13]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  The relationship between data and the precision of parameter estimates of hydrologic models , 1985 .

[14]  Peter Rousseeuw,et al.  Computing location depth and regression depth in higher dimensions , 1998, Stat. Comput..

[15]  Luis Samaniego,et al.  Modeling data relationships with a local variance reducing technique: Applications in hydrology , 2005 .

[16]  M. A. Kohler,et al.  Hydrology for engineers , 1958 .

[17]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Impacts of data length on optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation of a land surface model , 2004 .

[18]  Regina Y. Liu,et al.  Multivariate analysis by data depth: descriptive statistics, graphics and inference, (with discussion and a rejoinder by Liu and Singh) , 1999 .

[19]  András Bárdossy,et al.  Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model , 2004 .

[20]  V. Singh,et al.  The HBV model. , 1995 .

[21]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Robust estimation of hydrological model parameters , 2008 .

[22]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Identification of critical time periods for the efficient calibration of hydrological models , 2009 .

[23]  J. Harlin Development of a Process Oriented Calibration Scheme for the HBV Hydrological Model , 1991 .

[24]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  A framework for development and application of hydrological models , 2001, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[25]  Shailesh Kumar Singh,et al.  Improving the calibration strategy of the physically-based model WaSiM-ETH using critical events , 2012 .

[26]  Sharad K. Jain,et al.  Improving Efficiency in Training of Artificial Neural Networks using Information-rich Data , 2010 .