A knowledge management perspective to evaluation of enterprise information portals

The paper develops conceptual criteria for evaluating Enterprise Information Portal (EIP) systems in the context of knowledge management activities such as knowledge integration and application. The criteria have been drawn from an Activity theory perspective consisting of actors, community, object, tools, rules, and division of labor. It then discusses the characteristics of several commercial EIPs and evaluates one major commercial EIP in the context of the framework. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[2]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[3]  P. Klahr,et al.  Managing Customer Support Knowledge , 1998 .

[4]  D. Fichter Do I look like a maid? Strategies for preventing link rot , 1999 .

[5]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Explanations From Intelligent Systems: Theoretical Foundations and Implications for Practice , 1999, MIS Q..

[7]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Technology Competence of Business Managers: A Definition and Research Model , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Richard A. Glassco Evaluating commercial text search-and-retrieval packages , 1993 .

[10]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[11]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  B. Rubenstein-Montano,et al.  A systems thinking framework for knowledge management , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[15]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[16]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[17]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[18]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[20]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[21]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[22]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[23]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[24]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Knowledge management and data mining for marketing , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[26]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  Designing educational technology: computer-mediated change , 1995 .

[27]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Support for the sense-making activity of managers , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Knowing "What" to Do Is Not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action , 1999 .