Understanding e‐Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics

Electronic government (e‐Government) is one of the most important ways to bridge the digital divide in developing countries. We develop a model of e‐Government portal use. We use various individual characteristics, namely demographics and personality, as predictors of e‐Government portal use. Specifically, our predictors were (1) gender, age, income and education; (2) the Big Five personality characteristics, i.e. extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, agreeableness and openness to experience; and (3) personal innovativeness with information technology. We conducted a field study in a village in India. We collected data from over 300 heads of household. We found support for our model, with most variables being significant and explaining 40% of the variance in e‐Government portal use.

[1]  M Tate,et al.  [The state of the world population]. , 1968, Sanfujinka no jissai. Practice of gynecology and obstetrics.

[2]  L. H. Levy,et al.  Conceptions of personality : theories and research , 1970 .

[3]  R. Brislin.  Cross-cultural research methods , 1973 .

[4]  H. Hurt,et al.  SCALES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF INNOVATIVENESS , 1977 .

[5]  James E. Birren,et al.  Behavioral slowing with age: Causes, organization, and consequences. , 1980 .

[6]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety and Attitudes toward Microcomputers , 1989 .

[8]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[9]  S. M. Arnsten.  Intrinsic motivation. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[10]  Mark Conner,et al.  Age differences in skill acquisition and transfer in an implicit learning paradigm , 1992 .

[11]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The initiation and regulation of intrinsically motivated learning and achievement. , 1992 .

[12]  J Sharit,et al.  Ageing, computer-based task performance, and stress: issues and challenges. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[13]  G. Loewenstein.  The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. , 1994 .

[14]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[15]  Jan A.G.M. van Dijk,et al.  The network society , 1997 .

[16]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Michael A. Becker.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[18]  Ilana Landsberg-Lewis.  Bringing equality home : implementing the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discriminiation Against Women, CEDAW , 1998 .

[19]  Richard Heeks.  Reinventing Government in the Information Age , 1999 .

[20]  Tom Brier,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[21]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[22]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[23]  Venkatesh,et al.  Computer Technology Training in the Workplace: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effect of Mood. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[24]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[25]  B. Roberts,et al.  Broad Dispositions, Broad Aspirations: The Intersection of Personality Traits and Major Life Goals , 2000 .

[26]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[27]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  J. Church.  Human Development Report , 2001 .

[29]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges , 2001, MIS Q..

[30]  C. Avgerou,et al.  Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries , 2001 .

[31]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. , 2001 .

[32]  Larry J. Anderson,et al.  Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report , 2002 .

[33]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? , 2002 .

[34]  Richard Heeks.  Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform , 2002 .

[35]  Mark Srite,et al.  Individual differences and relative advantage: the case of GSS , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[36]  Kenneth Keniston,et al.  Grassroots ICT Projects in India: Some Preliminary Hypotheses , 2002 .

[37]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy , 2002, MIS Q..

[39]  F. Fincham,et al.  Facilitating creativity by regulating curiosity. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[40]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Encouraging Citizen Adoption of eGovernment by Building Trust , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[41]  Richard Heeks.  Most eGovernment-for-Development Projects Fail: How Can Risks be Reduced? , 2003 .

[42]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[43]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[44]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  The Link Between ICT and Economic Growth in the Discourse of Development , 2003, Information Systems Perspectives and Challenges in the Context of Globalization.

[45]  Peter A. Chow-White,et al.  Digital Divide , 2018, Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets.

[46]  May R. Berenbaum,et al.  Caught in the Net , 2001 .

[47]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[49]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[50]  Simone Cecchini,et al.  Electronic Government and the Rural Poor: The Case of Gyandoot , 2004 .

[51]  F. Fincham,et al.  Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities , 2004, Journal of personality assessment.

[52]  Deepak Kumar,et al.  IT Experience in India: Bridging the Digital Divide , 2004 .

[53]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[54]  S. Reiss.  Multifaceted Nature of Intrinsic Motivation: The Theory of 16 Basic Desires , 2004 .

[55]  Antonio Terracciano,et al.  Smoking and the Five-Factor Model of personality. , 2004, Addiction.

[56]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[57]  Claudio Ciborra,et al.  Interpreting e-government and development: Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[58]  Jyoti,et al.  A SURVEY OF CITIZENS ’ AWARENESS AND ADOPTION OF E-GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES , THE ‘ GOVERNMENT GATEWAY ’ : A UNITED KINGDOM PERSPECTIVE , 2005 .

[59]  K. Saxena,et al.  Towards excellence in e‐governance , 2005 .

[60]  J. Jensen.  Caught in the net , 2005 .

[61]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trust and Risk in eGovernment Adoption , 2008, AMCIS.

[62]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[63]  Frederick J. Riggins,et al.  The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Triveni Kuchi.  IT Experience in India: Bridging the Digital Divide , 2005 .

[65]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Examining the Socioeconomic Determinants of Adoption of the ‘ Government Gateway ’ Initiative in the UK , 2010 .

[66]  Ralf Klischewski.  Ontologies for e-document management in public administration , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[67]  Eileen Moore Trauth,et al.  Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems - IFIP TC8 WG8.2 International Working Conference, July 12-15, 2006, Limerick, Ireland , 2006, Social Inclusion.

[68]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2016 .

[69]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[70]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  A procedure model for process oriented E-Government projects , 2004 .

[71]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[72]  Mary Helen Fagan,et al.  Exploring city, county and state e-government initiatives: an East Texas perspective , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[73]  Jeffrey Barlow,et al.  Internet and American Life Project , 2006 .

[74]  John Ward,et al.  Integrated service delivery: Exploratory case studies of enterprise portal adoption in UK local government , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[75]  Michael L. Best,et al.  Impact and Sustainability of E-Government Services in Developing Countries: Lessons Learned from Tamil Nadu, India , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[76]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding Continued Information Technology Usage Behavior: A Comparison of Three Models in the Context of Mobile Internet , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[77]  D. Robey,et al.  Foreword: special issue on information systems in developing countries , 2007 .

[78]  M TownsendAnthony,et al.  Dispositional factors in internet use , 2007 .

[79]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of U.S. counties’ e-Government portals: development status and functionalities , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[80]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Understanding e-Government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[81]  H. Ono,et al.  Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata ☆ , 2007 .

[82]  Michael Grimsley,et al.  e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[83]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[84]  Zahir Irani,et al.  e-Government: past, present and future , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Satish K. Puri,et al.  Integrating Scientific with Indigenous Knowledge: Constructing Knowledge Alliances for Land Management in India , 2007, MIS Q..

[86]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Examining the factors affecting the adoption of broadband in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia , 2007, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[87]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Dispositional Factors in Internet Use: Personality Versus Cognitive Style , 2007, MIS Q..

[88]  Allam Ahmed,et al.  Open access towards bridging the digital divide–policies and strategies for developing countries , 2007 .

[89]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Consumer adoption and usage of broadband in Bangladesh , 2007, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[90]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[91]  A. Bhavnani,et al.  The role of mobile phones in sustainable rural poverty reduction , 2008 .

[92]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Research Note - How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[93]  Siriginidi Subba Rao.  Social development in Indian rural communities: Adoption of telecentres , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[94]  Geetha Vaidyanathan.  Technology parks in a developing country: the case of India , 2008 .

[95]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[96]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Acceptance with Peer Support: A Social Network Perspective to Understand Employees' System Use , 2009, MIS Q..

[97]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Why is Mobility in India so Low? Social Insurance, Inequality, and Growth , 2009 .

[98]  Tracy Ann Sykes,et al.  Impacts of Information and Communication Technology Implementations on Employees' Jobs in Service Organizations in India: A Multi‐Method Longitudinal Field Study , 2010 .

[99]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[100]  France Bélanger,et al.  Digitizing Government Interactions with Constituents: An Historical Review of E-Government Research in Information Systems , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[101]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Digital Divide Initiative Success in Developing Countries: A Longitudinal Field Study in a Village in India , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..