The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information Engineering

In this paper we show that systems development methodologies may contain incompatible assumptions about the role of users and information systems IS personnel during systems development. Using deconstruction, we analyze and interpret a systems development methodology currently receiving considerable attention-Information Engineering. We find that this methodology's characterization of IS-user relations and, in particular, its recommended partitioning of responsibility between IS and users is inconsistent and contradictory. Despite a heavy emphasis on user involvement, users are given a relatively passive role to play during development. At the same time, users are expected to sign off on projects and take responsibility for project outcomes. We suggest that such prescriptions, when put into action during systems development, make the relationship between users and IS personnel problematic. Further, we argue that the contradictions we surface in the methodology reflect contradictions and ideologies in the context within which systems development occurs. Our analysis raises important questions about the relationship between the production and consumption of information technology in organizations.

[1]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[2]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[3]  Martin Beirne,et al.  Computer Redesign and ‘Labour Process’ Theory: Towards a Critical Appraisal , 1988 .

[4]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[5]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  Letting the chat out of the bag: Deconstruction, privilege and accounting research , 1989 .

[6]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Control, causality and information system requirements , 1979 .

[7]  Charles Jencks,et al.  The new moderns : from late to neo-modernism , 1990 .

[8]  A. Preston,et al.  The “problem” in and of management information systems , 1991 .

[9]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  The commodification of expertise: The case of systems development consulting , 1991 .

[10]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Computer systems in work design--the ETHICS method : effective technical and human implementation of computer systems , 1979 .

[11]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[12]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1986 POWER OVER USERS : ITS EXERCISE BY SYSTEM PROFESSIONALS , 2017 .

[13]  Michael Newman,et al.  User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case Study , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  R. Boland Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research on information systems , 1986, Trends in Information Systems.

[15]  C. West Churchman,et al.  The Systems Approach , 1979 .

[16]  Victor Weinberg,et al.  Structured Analysis , 1978 .

[17]  John W. Erwin Annunciations to Anyone: The Disclosure of Authority in Writing and Painting , 1991 .

[18]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions , 1987, CSUR.

[19]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause , 1977 .

[20]  R. Kanter Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor and Magic , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[23]  N. Melone A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[24]  Tom DeMarco,et al.  Structured Analysis and System Specification , 1978 .

[25]  M. Klein Information politics , 1985 .

[26]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of Information Systems , 1992, MIS Q..

[27]  P. Man,et al.  Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism , 1983 .

[28]  Robert Cooper,et al.  Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 3: The Contribution of Jacques Derrida , 1989 .

[29]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[30]  J. Miller,et al.  The Ethics of Reading , 1986, The Humanities and Public Life.

[31]  Chris Gane,et al.  Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques , 1977 .

[32]  Jack J. Baroudi,et al.  The Information Systems Profession: Myth or Reality? , 1988 .

[33]  J. Rockart The line takes the leadership: IS management in a wired society , 1990 .

[34]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[35]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[36]  J. C. Henderson PLUGGING INTO STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS: THE CRITICAL IS CONNECTION , 1990 .

[37]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  Supporting the information technology champion , 1991 .