Policy-based self-management of hybrid ad hoc networks for dynamic channel configuration

Wireless networks have become a ubiquitous reality and ever more surround our everyday activities. They form and disappear around us spontaneously and have become new means for social interaction. At the same time, their increased complexity and heterogeneity have become barriers to their wider adoption and ease of use. It has become clear that self-management capabilities are vital for truly pervasive network management. To cater for the needs of both service providers and users, we propose a policy-based solution based on the ad hoc networking paradigm. By allowing limited infrastructure support, the notion of ldquohybrid ad hoc networksrdquo emerges as a flexible extension to todaypsilas networks. A distributed policy repository provides the support for policy-based device management and devices can autonomously adapt by examining local conditions and taking corrective actions in real-time. We design a system with self-management capabilities, able to self-configure and self-optimize connectivity parameters. Our aim is to simplify the management of hybrid ad hoc networks, enabling their coexistence and integration with wireless local area networks (WLANs). Implementation and deployment on a wireless testbed have demonstrated significant performance improvement for ad hoc networks in the presence of interference. Our experiments have measured a 33% goodput increase, after switching to a non-interfering channel in real-time.

[1]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[2]  Raouf Boutaba,et al.  SELFCON: An architecture for self-configuration of networks , 2001, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[3]  George Pavlou,et al.  Exploiting Context-Awareness for the Autonomic Management of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, Journal of Network and Systems Management.

[4]  Hong Cheng,et al.  Policy-based mobile ad hoc network management , 2004, Proceedings. Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2004. POLICY 2004..

[5]  Marco Conti,et al.  Multihop Ad Hoc Networking: The Reality , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  David W. Chadwick,et al.  Coordination between distributed PDPs , 2006, Seventh IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'06).

[7]  George Pavlou,et al.  A context-aware, policy-based framework for the management of MANETs , 2006, Seventh IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'06).

[8]  Jeffrey O. Kephart,et al.  The Vision of Autonomic Computing , 2003, Computer.

[9]  Sylvie Perreau,et al.  Hidden vs . Exposed Terminal Problem in Ad hoc Networks , .

[10]  Mark Burgess,et al.  Scalability of Peer Configuration Management in Logically Ad Hoc Networks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[11]  Dinesh C. Verma,et al.  Simplifying network administration using policy-based management , 2002, IEEE Netw..

[12]  Jim Sermersheim,et al.  Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol , 2006, RFC.

[13]  George Pavlou,et al.  A Policy-Based Approach for Managing Ubiquitous Networks in Urban Spaces , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[14]  Kurt D. Zeilenga,et al.  The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Content Synchronization Operation , 2006, RFC.

[15]  Emil C. Lupu,et al.  Policy Specification for Programmable Networks , 1999, IWAN.