Adsorption and structure of the adsorbed layer of ionic surfactants.

Our goal in this study was to investigate theoretically and experimentally the adsorption of ionic surfactants and the role of different factors in the mechanism of adsorption, the adsorption parameters and the structure of the adsorbed layer. We used available literature data for the interfacial tension, sigma, vs. concentration, C(s), for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in three representative systems with Air/Water (A/W), Oil/Water (O/W) and Oil/Water + 0.1 M NaCl (O/WE) interfaces. We derived 6 new adsorption isotherms and 6 new equations of state (EOS) based on the adsorption isotherms for non-ionic surfactants of Langmuir, Volmer and Helfand-Frisch-Lebowitz (HFL) with interaction term betatheta2/2 in the EOS, theta=alphaGamma being the degree of coverage, with Gamma--adsorption and alpha--minimum area per molecule. We applied Gouy equation for high surface potentials and modified it to account for partial penetration of the counterions in the adsorbed layer. The equations were written in terms of the effective concentration C=[C(s)(C(s)+C(el))](1/2), where C(s) and C(el) are, respectively concentrations of the surfactant and the electrolyte. We showed that the adsorption constant K was model independent and derived an equation for the effective thickness of the adsorbed layer, delta(s). We found also that the minimum area per molecule, alpha, is larger than the true area, alpha(0), which depends on the adsorption model and is a function of the adsorption Gamma. The interaction term betatheta2/2 in the Langmuir EOS was found to be exact for small beta<<1, but for the Volmer EOS it turned out to be only a crude approximation. Semi-quantitative considerations about the interaction between adsorbed discrete charges revealed that at A/W interface part of the adsorbed surfactant molecules are partially immersed in water, which leads to decreased repulsion and increased adsorption Gamma. At O/W the larger adsorption energy keeps the surfactant molecules on the surface, so that the electrostatic repulsion is stronger, which translates into negative beta's, larger alpha's and smaller adsorption. The addition of electrolyte partly screens the repulsion at O/W, leading to decreased alpha and increased adsorption. We determined K, alpha and beta by a three-parameter fit. The constant K was found to be model independent and smaller for A/W than for O/W, because of the smaller adsorption energy. The values of alpha were larger for O/W than for A/W and decreased for O/W upon addition of electrolyte in agreement with the theory. For the Volmer model alpha was smaller than for Langmuir's model and both were found to increase with decreasing Gamma - again in agreement with the theoretical predictions. It turned out that theta never exceeds 0.5 i.e. the adsorbed layer is never saturated. We tried to determine which adsorption model gave better results by calculating theoretically the Gibbs elasticity, but it turned out that when the results were plotted vs. an experimental variable, say C, all curves collapsed in a single one, which coincided with the respective experimental curve. This means that it is impossible to determine the adsorption model by using only interfacial tension data.

[1]  M. Aratono,et al.  Thermodynamic studies on adsorption at interfaces , 1990 .

[2]  Krassimir D. Danov,et al.  Thermodynamics of Ionic Surfactant Adsorption with Account for the Counterion Binding: Effect of Salts of Various Valency , 1999 .

[3]  Charles Tanford,et al.  The hydrophobic effect , 1980 .

[4]  H. Frisch,et al.  Theory of the Two‐ and One‐Dimensional Rigid Sphere Fluids , 1961 .

[5]  J. DeBoer The Dynamical Character of Adsorption , 1953 .

[6]  O. Velev,et al.  Charging of Oil−Water Interfaces Due to Spontaneous Adsorption of Hydroxyl Ions , 1996, Langmuir.

[7]  K. Danov,et al.  Effect of Nonionic Admixtures on the Adsorption of Ionic Surfactants at Fluid Interfaces. 2. Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate and Dodecylbenzene , 2003 .

[8]  D. Haydon,et al.  Neutral molecules and a simplified treatment for ions , 1960, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences.

[9]  K. Danov,et al.  Mixed solutions of anionic and zwitterionic surfactant (Betaine): surface-tension isotherms, adsorption, and relaxation kinetics. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  J. Eriksson,et al.  A molecular theory of the surface tension of surfactant solutions , 1989 .

[11]  V. Fainerman,et al.  Adsorption of single and mixed ionic surfactants at fluid interfaces. , 2002, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[12]  J. Blakely Physical adsorption. , 1976, Science.

[13]  A. Van Itterbeek,et al.  Mesures sur la viscosit de l'oxygne dans un champ magntique et pour des trs basses pressions , 1938 .

[14]  Krassimir D. Danov,et al.  Comparison of the van der Waals and frumkin adsorption isotherms for sodium dodecyl sulfate at various salt concentrations , 2002 .

[15]  I. Langmuir THE ADSORPTION OF GASES ON PLANE SURFACES OF GLASS, MICA AND PLATINUM. , 1918 .

[16]  D. Blankschtein,et al.  Prediction of Equilibrium Surface Tension and Surface Adsorption of Aqueous Surfactant Mixtures Containing Ionic Surfactants , 1999 .

[17]  K. Danov,et al.  Effect of Nonionic Admixtures on the Adsorption of Ionic Surfactants at Fluid Interfaces. 1. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Dodecanol , 2003 .

[18]  L. Liggieri,et al.  Molecular reorientation in the adsorption of some CiEj at the water-air interface , 1999 .

[19]  S. Hayashi,et al.  A convenient experimental method for measurement of zeta-potentials generating on the bubble suspended in aqueous surfactant solutions , 1983 .

[20]  J. Davies,et al.  The distribution of ions under a charged monolayer, and a surface equation of state for charged films , 1951, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[21]  C. Radke,et al.  An ion-binding model for ionic surfactant adsorption at aqueous-fluid interfaces , 1996 .

[22]  G. Stell,et al.  Strong short‐range attractions in a fluid , 1990 .

[23]  D. Haydon,et al.  On adsorption at the oil/water interface and the calculation of electrical potentials in the aqueous surface phase. II. The effects of ionic size , 1960, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[24]  K. Marinova,et al.  Ionic surfactants on fluid interfaces: determination of the adsorption; role of the salt and the type of the hydrophobic phase , 2005 .

[25]  E. H. Lucassen-Reynders Surface Equation of State for Ionized Surfactants , 1966 .

[26]  Reinhard Miller,et al.  Adsorption of surfactants and proteins at fluid interfaces , 1998 .

[27]  S. Rehfeld Adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate at various hydrocarbon-water interfaces , 1967 .

[28]  D. Wasan,et al.  Equilibrium and dynamics of adsorption of surfactants at fluid-fluid interfaces , 1988 .

[29]  M. Aratono,et al.  Thermodynamic study on the adsorption of dodecylammonium chloride at water/hexane interface , 1980 .

[30]  J. Lu,et al.  The Structure of Monododecyl Pentaethylene Glycol Monolayers with and without Added Dodecane at the Air/Solution Interface: A Neutron Reflection Study , 1998 .

[31]  J. Hines The Preparation of Surface Chemically Pure Sodiumn-Dodecyl Sulfate by Foam Fractionation , 1996 .

[32]  R. Yoon,et al.  Zeta-potential measurements on microbubbles generated using various surfactants , 1986 .

[33]  J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[34]  G. Czichocki,et al.  Effect of counterions on the adsorption of ionic surfactants at fluid-fluid interfaces , 2002 .