A Consensus Adenine at Position –11 of the Nontemplate Strand of Bacterial Promoter Is Important for Nucleation of Promoter Melting*

Numerous studies have suggested an important role of adenine at position –11 of the nontemplate strand of bacterial promoters for sequence-specific recognition of the –10 promoter element in single-stranded form. In this work, we attempted to identify a specific step in transcription initiation reaction that is most critically dependent on specific recognition of –11A. Mutating –11A in the context of a model promoter resulted in a profound decrease of the rate of heparin-resistant promoter complex formation and in a modest increase of the rate of heparin-resistant complex dissociation. The identity of nontemplate base at position –11 became relatively unimportant when the duplex in the vicinity of this position was destabilized by base pair mismatches. For promoters with a nonnative thymine at nontemplate position –11, we observed a remarkable correlation between the rate of heparin-resistant complex formation (or transcription activity) and the free energy of duplex stability in the vicinity of this residue, indicating that the replacement of –11A with a T affected a step in the reaction that involves local melting of DNA duplex. These data show that a promoter melting defect caused by a loss of RNA polymerase contact with –11A can be rescued by artificially induced local destabilization of the DNA duplex. These results are consistent with and support the idea that specific recognition of adenine at the nontemplate –11-position is important only for the initial nucleation of melting, which probably involves the flipping of this adenine out from the DNA duplex.

[1]  T. Heyduk,et al.  Sequence determinants for the recognition of the fork junction DNA containing the -10 region of promoter DNA by E. coli RNA polymerase. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[2]  W. Ross,et al.  Two open complexes and a requirement for Mg2+ to open the lambda PR transcription start site. , 1993, Science.

[3]  T. Heyduk,et al.  Conformation and DNA binding properties of a single-stranded DNA binding region of sigma 70 subunit from Escherichia coli RNA polymerase are modulated by an interaction with the core enzyme. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[4]  R. Burgess,et al.  Temperature dependence of the rate constants of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-lambda PR promoter interaction. Assignment of the kinetic steps corresponding to protein conformational change and DNA opening. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  M. Thomas Record,et al.  RNA Polymerase-Promoter Interactions: the Comings and Goings of RNA Polymerase , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  RNA polymerase alters the mobility of an A-residue crucial to polymerase-induced melting of promoter DNA. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[7]  J. Tainer,et al.  A nucleotide-flipping mechanism from the structure of human uracil–DNA glycosylase bound to DNA , 1996, Nature.

[8]  Roe Jh,et al.  Regulation of the kinetics of the interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with the lambda PR promoter by salt concentration. , 1985 .

[9]  G. Spiegelman,et al.  DNA strand separation during activation of a developmental promoter by the Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Record,et al.  Kinetic Studies and Structural Models of the Association of E. coli σ70 RNA Polymerase with the λPR Promoter: Large Scale Conformational Changes in Forming the Kinetically Significant Intermediates , 2002 .

[11]  J. Helmann,et al.  DNA-melting at the Bacillus subtilis flagellin promoter nucleates near -10 and expands unidirectionally. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  T. Heyduk,et al.  Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase Contacts outside the –10 Promoter Element Are Not Essential for Promoter Melting* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Jeffrey W. Roberts,et al.  Base-Specific Recognition of the Nontemplate Strand of Promoter DNA by E. coli RNA Polymerase , 1996, Cell.

[14]  Xiaoyong Li,et al.  Stimulation of Open Complex Formation by Nicks and Apurinic Sites Suggests a Role for Nucleation of DNA Melting in Escherichia coli Promoter Function* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  J. Gralla,et al.  Promoter opening via a DNA fork junction binding activity. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  S. Adhya,et al.  An Unsubstituted C2 Hydrogen of Adenine Is Critical and Sufficient at the –11 Position of a Promoter to Signal Base Pair Deformation* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  P. Dehaseth,et al.  Protein-nucleic acid interactions during open complex formation investigated by systematic alteration of the protein and DNA binding partners. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[18]  H. Margalit,et al.  Compilation of E. coli mRNA promoter sequences. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  D. Crothers,et al.  Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  K. Severinov,et al.  A mutant RNA polymerase that forms unusual open promoter complexes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Linear free energy correlations for enzymatic base flipping: how do damaged base pairs facilitate specific recognition? , 2004, Biochemistry.

[22]  J. Roberts,et al.  Promoter recognition as measured by binding of polymerase to nontemplate strand oligonucleotide. , 1997, Science.

[23]  R. Burgess,et al.  Kinetics and mechanism of the interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with the λPR promoter , 1984 .

[24]  R. Burgess,et al.  Use of Mono Q high-resolution ion-exchange chromatography to obtain highly pure and active Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[25]  R. Burgess,et al.  A procedure for the rapid, large-scall purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[26]  J. Helmann,et al.  Pathway of promoter melting by Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase at a stable RNA promoter: effects of temperature, delta protein, and sigma factor mutations. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[27]  T. Heyduk,et al.  Conformational Changes of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase ς70 Factor Induced by Binding to the Core Enzyme* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  Xuejun Huang,et al.  sigma factor mutations affecting the sequence-selective interaction of RNA polymerase with -10 region single-stranded DNA , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  C. Gross,et al.  Minimal Machinery of RNA Polymerase Holoenzyme Sufficient for Promoter Melting , 2004, Science.

[30]  J. Stivers,et al.  A mechanistic perspective on the chemistry of DNA repair glycosylases. , 2003, Chemical reviews.

[31]  Bernd G. Pfrommer,et al.  Temperature-dependent hydrogen-bond geometry in liquid water. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[32]  Jeffrey W. Roberts,et al.  Function of E. coli RNA Polymerase σ Factor- σ70 in Promoter-Proximal Pausing , 1996, Cell.

[33]  S. Darst,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of E. coil core RNA polymerase: Promoter binding and elongation conformations of the enzyme , 1995, Cell.

[34]  E. Kool,et al.  Hydrogen bonding, base stacking, and steric effects in dna replication. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.