Predicting Free-Space Occupancy on Novel Artificial Structures by an Invasive Intertidal Barnacle Using a Removal Experiment

Artificial structures can create novel habitat in the marine environment that has been associated with the spread of invasive species. They are often located in areas of high disturbance and can vary significantly in the area of free space provided for settlement of marine organisms. Whilst correlation between the amount of free space available and recruitment success has been shown in populations of several marine benthic organisms, there has been relatively little focus on invasive species, a group with the potential to reproduce in vast numbers and colonise habitats rapidly. Invasion success following different scales of disturbance was examined in the invasive acorn barnacle, Austrominius modestus , on a unique art installation located in Liverpool Bay. Population growth and recruitment success were examined by comparing recruitment rates within disturbance clearings of 4 different sizes and by contrasting population development with early recruitment rates over a 10 week period. Disturbed areas were rapidly recolonised and monocultures of A . modestus formed within 6 weeks. The size of patch created during disturbance had no effect on the rate of recruitment, while a linear relationship between recruit density and patch size was observed. Density-dependent processes mediated initial high recruitment resulting in population stability after 8-10 weeks, but densities continued to greatly exceed those reported in natural habitats. Given that artificial structures are likely to continue to proliferate in light of climate change projections, free-space is likely to become more available more frequently in the future supporting the expansion of fast-colonising species.

[1]  P. Doherty,et al.  An Empirical Test of Recruitment Limitation in a Coral Reef Fish , 1994, Science.

[2]  A. Shanks.  Pelagic Larval Duration and Dispersal Distance Revisited , 2009, The Biological Bulletin.

[3]  E. Johnston,et al.  Manipulating larval supply in the field: a controlled study of marine invasibility , 2005 .

[4]  K. Walters,et al.  Recruit-recruit interactions, density-dependent processes and population persistence in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica , 2010 .

[5]  J. P. Stevenson,et al.  Gregariousness during settlement in the barnacle Elminius modestus Darwin , 1950, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[6]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[7]  K. Walters,et al.  Interactions between Multiple Recruitment Drivers: Post-Settlement Predation Mortality and Flow-Mediated Recruitment , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Stephen J. Hawkins,et al.  Introductory comments - Global change in marine ecosystems: Patterns, processes and interactions with regional and local scale impacts , 2011 .

[9]  R. Barbehenn,et al.  Importance of protein quality versus quantity in alternative host plants for a leaf-feeding insect , 2013, Oecologia.

[10]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology , 2009 .

[11]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Larval settlement rate: A leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  G. Thorson.  REPRODUCTIVE and LARVAL ECOLOGY OF MARINE BOTTOM INVERTEBRATES , 1950, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  John A. Williams,et al.  Composition and temporal distribution of cirripede larvae in Southampton Water, England, with particular reference to the secondary production of Elminius modestus , 2004 .

[14]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  A Primer of Ecology , 1995 .

[15]  R M Nisbet,et al.  Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community , 2001, Nature.

[16]  Effects of early recruits on temperate sessile marine community composition depend on other species recruiting at the time , 2013, Oecologia.

[17]  D. Marshall,et al.  Are numbers enough? Colonizer phenotype and abundance interact to affect population dynamics. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[18]  Jeremiah N. Jarrett,et al.  INTER-POPULATION VARIATION IN SHELL MORPHOLOGY OF THE BARNACLE CHTHAMALUS FISSUS , 2008 .

[19]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Grete E. Dinesen,et al.  Low-crested coastal defence structures as artificial habitats for marine life: Using ecological criteria in design , 2005 .

[21]  M. Thiel,et al.  Predation contributes to invasion resistance of benthic communities against the non-indigenous tunicate Ciona intestinalis , 2011, Biological Invasions.

[22]  C. F. Gaymer,et al.  Anthropogenic structures as a spatial refuge from predation for the invasive bryozoan Bugula neritina , 2011 .

[23]  D. Crisp,et al.  THE INTERACTION BETWEEN BREEDING AND GROWTH RATE IN THE BARNACLE ELMINIUS MODESTUS DARWIN , 1961 .

[24]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Influence of recruitment and temperature on distribution of intertidal barnacles in the English Channel , 2007, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[25]  J. Pineda.  Spatial and temporal patterns in barnacle settlement rate along a southern California rocky shore , 1994 .

[26]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Urban structures as marine habitats , 1999 .

[27]  James A. Drake,et al.  Biological invasions : a global perspective , 1989 .

[28]  B. Menge.  Relative importance of recruitment and other causes of variation in rocky intertidal community structure , 1991 .

[29]  Laura Airoldi,et al.  ROLES OF DISTURBANCE, SEDIMENT STRESS, AND SUBSTRATUM RETENTION ON SPATIAL DOMINANCE IN ALGAL TURF , 1998 .

[30]  W. Sousa.  The Role of Disturbance in Natural Communities , 1984 .

[31]  J. Connell.  The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[32]  J. Suhonen,et al.  Founder population size and number of source populations enhance colonization success in waterstriders , 2003, Oecologia.

[33]  S. E. Alexander,et al.  Larval Transport and Population Dynamics of Intertidal Barnacles: A Coupled Benthic/Oceanic Model , 1996 .

[34]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments , 2010 .

[35]  Michael Elliott,et al.  The Habitat-Creation Potential of Offshore Wind Farms , 2009, Renewable Energy.

[36]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Temporal Changes in the Strength of Density-dependent Mortality and Growth in Intertidal Barnacles , 2022 .

[37]  M. Bishop.  Establishment of an Immigrant Barnacle in British Coastal Waters , 1947, Nature.

[38]  E. Johnston,et al.  Temporal change in the diversity-invasibility relationship in the presence of a disturbance regime. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[39]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Ecological impact of coastal defence structures on sediment and mobile fauna: Evaluating and forecasting consequences of unavoidable modifications of native habitats , 2005 .

[40]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  The importance of water‐retaining features for biodiversity on artificial intertidal coastal defence structures , 2013 .

[41]  Osman,et al.  Species Diversity and Invasion Resistance in a Marine Ecosystem. , 1999, Science.

[42]  D. Wethey.  Spatial pattern in barnacle settlement: day to day changes during the settlement season , 1984, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[43]  M. Pagel,et al.  Species number, population density and body size relationships in natural communities , 1990 .

[44]  D. Crisp,et al.  The Spread of Elminius Modestus Darwin In North-West Europe , 1958, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[45]  M. Keough,et al.  Predation during early post-settlement varies in importance for shaping marine sessile communities , 2007 .

[46]  Leonie A. Robinson,et al.  Cleft, Crevice, or the Inner Thigh: ‘Another Place’ for the Establishment of the Invasive Barnacle Austrominius modestus (Darwin, 1854) , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  What Do Real Population Dynamics Tell Us About Minimum Viable Population Sizes , 1990 .

[48]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Do urban structures influence local abundance and diversity of subtidal epibiota? A case study from Sydney Harbour, Australia , 1999 .

[49]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Artificial marine structures facilitate the spread of a non‐indigenous green alga, Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides, in the north Adriatic Sea , 2005 .

[50]  J. Spicer,et al.  Can ocean acidification affect population dynamics of the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides at its southern range edge? , 2010, Ecology.

[51]  R. Scheibling,et al.  Free-Space Availability and Larval Substratum Selection as Determinants of BarnaclePopulation-Structure in a Developing Rocky Intertidal Community , 1993 .

[52]  K. Jun Bando,et al.  The Roles of Competition and Disturbance in a Marine Invasion , 2006, Biological Invasions.