An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species

Numbers of non–indigenous species—species introduced from elsewhere—are increasing rapidly worldwide, causing both environmental and economic damage. Rigorous quantitative risk–analysis frameworks, however, for invasive species are lacking. We need to evaluate the risks posed by invasive species and quantify the relative merits of different management strategies (e.g. allocation of resources between prevention and control). We present a quantitative bioeconomic modelling framework to analyse risks from non–indigenous species to economic activity and the environment. The model identifies the optimal allocation of resources to prevention versus control, acceptable invasion risks and consequences of invasion to optimal investments (e.g. labour and capital). We apply the model to zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), and show that society could benefit by spending up to US$324 000 year−1 to prevent invasions into a single lake with a power plant. By contrast, the US Fish and Wildlife Service spent US$825 000 in 2001 to manage all aquatic invaders in all US lakes. Thus, greater investment in prevention is warranted.

[1]  Endogenous risk in weed control management , 1996 .

[2]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[3]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[4]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[5]  Yu-chi Deng.  Present and expected economic costs of zebra mussel damages to water users with great lakes water intakes , 1996 .

[6]  Mark Williamson,et al.  The Economics of Biological Invasions , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[7]  J. Wilczynski.  Labour and Capital , 1974 .

[8]  J. Shogren,et al.  Economics of the Endangered Species Act , 1998 .

[9]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Zebra Mussel Demography and Modeling: Preliminary Analysis of Population Data from Upper Midwest Rivers. , 1998 .

[10]  D. Richardson,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Alien Plant Invasions: Examples of Impacts and Approaches to Sustainable Management in South Africa , 2001 .

[11]  A. Ricciardi,et al.  Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: a priority for aquatic resource management , 1998 .

[12]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective , 2002 .

[13]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management , 2000 .

[14]  D. Starrett.  Valuing Ecosystem Services , 1998 .

[15]  Clifford E. Kraft,et al.  PREDICTION OF LONG‐DISTANCE DISPERSAL USING GRAVITY MODELS: ZEBRA MUSSEL INVASION OF INLAND LAKES , 2001 .

[16]  Anthony Ricciardi,et al.  Overland dispersal of aquatic invasive species: a risk assessment of transient recreational boating. , 2001 .

[17]  Anthony Ricciardi,et al.  Impending extinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionoida) following the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion , 1998 .

[18]  J. Mcneely.  Global strategy on invasive alien species , 2001 .

[19]  J. Verhey,et al.  Risk assessment in the federal government , 1983 .

[20]  A. Zellner.  An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[21]  S. Effler,et al.  Tributary Water Quality Feedback from the Spread of Zebra Mussels: Oswego River, New York , 1998 .

[22]  R. Costanza.  Social Goals and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services , 2000, Ecosystems.

[23]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States , 2000 .

[24]  D. Ludwig,et al.  Ecology, Conservation, and Public Policy , 2001 .