Grammatical gender in spoken word recognition in German

The role of grammatical gender for auditory word recognition in German was investigated in three experiments and two sets of corpus analyses. In the corpus analyses, gender information reduced the lexical search space as well as the amount of input needed to uniquely identify a word. To test whether this holds for on-line processing, two auditory lexical decision experiments (Experiments 1 and 3) were conducted using valid, invalid, or noise-masked articles as primes. Clear gender-priming effects were obtained in both experiments. Experiment 2 used phoneme monitoring with words and with pseudowords deviating from base words in one or more phonological features. Contrary to the lexical decision latencies, phoneme-monitoring latencies showed no influence of gender but did show similarity mismatch effects. We argue that gender information is not utilized early during word recognition. Rather, the presence of a valid article increases the initial familiarity of a word, facilitating subsequent responses.

[1]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[2]  T. Deelman,et al.  Missing information in spoken word recognition: nonreleased stop consonants. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[5]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Effect of Grammatical Gender and Semantic Context on Lexical Access in Italian , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[6]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  M T Turvey,et al.  Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[8]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. , 1992 .

[9]  J. Segui,et al.  Grammatical incongruency and vocabulary types , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[12]  Wus van Lessen Kloeke.  Deutsche Phonologie und Morphologie: Merkmale und Markiertheit , 1982 .

[13]  J Segui,et al.  Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence for associative context effects , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms , 1984 .

[15]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[16]  C. Connine.  Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context , 1987 .

[17]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Linguistic Gender and Spoken-Word Recognition in French , 2000 .

[18]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[19]  E. Bates,et al.  Gender priming in Italian , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records , 1995 .

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .

[23]  F. Donders,et al.  Over de snelheid van psychische Processen , 1868 .

[24]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  D. Balota,et al.  Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989). , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  C.M.E. Zwitserlood,et al.  Words and sentences: the effects of sentential-semantic context on spoken-word processing , 1989 .

[27]  Jens Bölte,et al.  When is all understood and done? The psychological reality of the recognition point , 2004, Brain and Language.

[28]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[29]  Jens Bölte.  Graded lexical activation by pseudowords in cross-modal semantic priming: Spreading of activation, backward priming, or repair? , 2001 .

[30]  M. T. Turvey,et al.  Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by inflected adjectives , 1985, Cognition.

[31]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Representation and Processing of Grammatical Gender in Language Production: A Review , 1999 .

[32]  J. Pynte,et al.  Effect of grammatical gender on visual word recognition: Evidence from lexical decision and eye movement experiments , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Richard M. Hogg,et al.  Phonology and Morphology , 1992 .

[34]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Trouble with Cognitive Subtraction , 1996, NeuroImage.

[36]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Gender and lexical access in Italian , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  David Patterson,et al.  Corpora Analyses of Frequency of Schwa Deletion in Conversational American English , 2003, Phonetica.

[38]  James E. Hoard,et al.  Introduction to Phonology , 1978 .

[39]  David Carter,et al.  An information-theoretic analysis of phonetic dictionary access , 1987 .

[40]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[41]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  When Does Gender Constrain Parsing? Evidence from ERPs , 1999 .

[42]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Similarity Mapping in Spoken Word Recognition , 1997 .

[43]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Context effects in lexical processing , 1987, Cognition.

[44]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  David Patterson,et al.  Variant Frequency in Flap Production , 2001, Phonetica.

[46]  F. Grosjean,et al.  The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch , 2003 .

[48]  Jens Bölte,et al.  Is Phonological Information Mapped onto Semantic Information in a One-to-One Manner? , 2002, Brain and Language.

[49]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Processing Grammatical Gender During Language Comprehension , 1999 .

[50]  T Jacobsen,et al.  Effects of Grammatical Gender on Picture and Word Naming: Evidence from German , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[51]  Thorsten Brants.  TnT - Statistical Part-of-Speech Tagging , 2000 .

[52]  F. Donders.  On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.