A comparative study on the use of black box modelling for piezoelectric actuators

In this article, different approaches of the use of black box modelling techniques for piezoelectric actuators are particularly addressed, regardless of the employed technique/algorithm. A modelling approach in this paper refers to two matters: the first, the role of black box techniques in modelling (i.e. if physics-based techniques are also involved in modelling; if so, how and to what extent). From this aspect, the spectrum of approaches ranges from those merged with/inspired by classical phenomenological models to an approach based on purely system identification-based techniques. The second aspect of modelling approaches, in this article, is the input variables to the model. Current and previous values of input voltage, previous values of the output (displacement), derivatives and extremum values of the system's input/output have been used as the inputs to the model so far. Both aforementioned aspects of modelling approaches are addressed appropriately in this article, and various modelling approaches in the literature are categorized and presented in a uniform and comparable manner, so that readers can easily identify research trends in this area and the gaps in the literature. One of the identified unanswered questions in the literature is whether the extremum values of the system's input/output should/should not be used as an input to black box models of piezoelectric actuators. There are works in the literature which have/have not used the aforementioned input variables, but there is no published investigation to evidently answer the proposed question. This article, in the last section, answers this question by reporting and discussing an experimental study.

[1]  Faa-Jeng Lin,et al.  An adaptive recurrent radial basis function network tracking controller for a two-dimensional piezo-positioning stage , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[2]  David G. Vass,et al.  Proceedings of the Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) , 1997 .

[3]  Kuo-Ming Chang,et al.  Adaptive Neural Network Control for Piezoelectric Hysteresis Compensation in A Positioning System , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Jie Zhu,et al.  Implementation procedure for the generalized moving Preisach model based on a first order reversal curve diagram , 2009 .

[5]  Luc Dupré,et al.  Generalized scalar Preisach model for grain oriented materials excited along arbitrary directions , 2001 .

[6]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[7]  Yonghong Tan,et al.  Neural networks based identification and compensation of rate-dependent hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators , 2010 .

[8]  Musa Jouaneh,et al.  Generalized preisach model for hysteresis nonlinearity of piezoceramic actuators , 1997 .

[9]  In Lee,et al.  Vibration and actuation characteristics of composite structures with a bonded piezo-ceramic actuator , 1999 .

[10]  G Shaver,et al.  Piezoelectric Fuel Injection: Pulse-to-Pulse Coupling and Flow Rate Estimation , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  Alexander Schirrer,et al.  Vibration damping of a flexible car body structure using piezo-stack actuators , 2008 .

[12]  Wei Li,et al.  Modeling Hysteresis in Piezo Actuator Based on Neural Networks , 2008, ISICA.

[13]  F. Preisach Über die magnetische Nachwirkung , 1935 .

[14]  Thor Andreas Tangen,et al.  Nonlinear propagation acoustics of dual-frequency wide-band excitation pulses in a focused ultrasound system. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  M. Vidyasagar An Elementary Derivation of the Large Deviation Rate Function for Finite State Markov Chains , 2014 .

[16]  Nagi G. Naganathan,et al.  Preisach modeling of hysteresis for piezoceramic actuator system , 2002 .

[17]  Yonghong Tan,et al.  RBF neural networks hysteresis modelling for piezoceramic actuator using hybrid model , 2007 .

[18]  Faa-Jeng Lin,et al.  Adaptive wavelet neural network control with hysteresis estimation for piezo-positioning mechanism , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[19]  C. Visone,et al.  Magnetic hysteresis modeling via feed-forward neural networks , 1998 .

[20]  Faa-Jeng Lin,et al.  Adaptive control with hysteresis estimation and compensation using RFNN for piezo-actuator , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  Jin Wei Liang,et al.  Precision Control of a Piezo-Actuate System Using Fuzzy Sliding-Mode Control with Feedforward Predictor-Based Compensation , 2008 .

[22]  Li Chuntao,et al.  A neural networks model for hysteresis nonlinearity , 2004 .

[23]  Yonghong Tan,et al.  Modeling hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators using NARMAX models , 2009 .

[24]  Wen-Fang Xie,et al.  Neural network‐based adaptive control of piezoelectric actuators with unknown hysteresis , 2009 .

[25]  Lei Chen,et al.  A critical review of the most popular types of neuro control , 2012 .

[26]  Jingjun Zhang,et al.  Neural Network Predictive Control for Piezoelectric Smart Structures , 2008 .

[27]  Riccardo Scorretti,et al.  Quasistatic hysteresis modeling with feed-forward neural networks: Influence of the last but one extreme values , 2008 .

[28]  Isotropic vector hysteresis modeling with feed-forward neural networks , 2002 .

[29]  Hong Chen,et al.  Approximation capability in C(R¯n) by multilayer feedforward networks and related problems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[30]  Han-Xiong Li,et al.  Feedback-Linearization-Based Neural Adaptive Control for Unknown Nonaffine Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[31]  Elias B. Kosmatopoulos,et al.  Analysis and modification of Volterra/Wiener neural networks for the adaptive identification of non-linear hysteretic dynamic systems , 2004 .

[32]  Mohammed Douimi,et al.  Piezo-actuators modeling for smart applications , 2011 .

[33]  Lei Chen,et al.  Intelligent predictive control of a model helicopter's yaw angle , 2010 .

[34]  Seung-Woo Kim,et al.  Improvement of scanning accuracy of PZT piezoelectric actuators by feed-forward model-reference control , 1994 .

[35]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Frequency response of beams with passively constrained damping layers and piezoactuators , 1998, Smart Structures.

[36]  Jooyoung Park,et al.  Approximation and Radial-Basis-Function Networks , 1993, Neural Computation.

[37]  Hui Chen,et al.  Corrigendum to “A neural networks based model for rate-dependent hysteresis for piezoceramic actuators” [Sens. Actuators A 143 (2008) 370–376] , 2008 .

[38]  J. Soderkvist Using FEA to treat piezoelectric low-frequency resonators , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[39]  Isaak D. Mayergoyz,et al.  Dynamic Preisach models of hysteresis , 1988 .

[40]  Dongwoo Song,et al.  Modeling of piezo actuator’s nonlinear and frequency dependent dynamics , 1999 .

[41]  Ye-Hwa Chen,et al.  Piezomechanics using intelligent variable-structure control , 2001, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[42]  Lei Chen,et al.  Hybrid intelligent control of an infrared dryer , 2010 .

[43]  Xinliang Zhang,et al.  A hybrid model for rate-dependent hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators , 2010 .

[44]  Hong Chen,et al.  Universal approximation to nonlinear operators by neural networks with arbitrary activation functions and its application to dynamical systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[45]  Musa Jouaneh,et al.  Modeling hysteresis in piezoceramic actuators , 1995 .

[46]  Ali Ghaffari,et al.  Identification and control of power plant de-superheater using soft computing techniques , 2007, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[47]  Yudong Zhang,et al.  IMAGE-BASED HYSTERESIS MODELING AND COMPENSATION FOR AN AFM PIEZO-SCANNER , 2009 .

[48]  S. Masri,et al.  Robust Adaptive Neural Estimation of Restoring Forces in Nonlinear Structures , 2001 .

[49]  Peter Doel,et al.  A 1-metre Ni coated CFRP demonstrator for large deformable mirrors , 2010 .

[50]  Le Yi Wang,et al.  Identification of cascaded systems with linear and quantized observations , 2009 .

[51]  Jingyan Dong,et al.  Development of a High-Bandwidth XY Nanopositioning Stage for High-Rate Micro-/Nanomanufacturing , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[52]  Hong Chen,et al.  Approximation capability to functions of several variables, nonlinear functionals, and operators by radial basis function neural networks , 1993, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[53]  Hao Ying,et al.  General Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems are universal approximators , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36228).

[54]  Jianzhong Xu,et al.  Active control of fluctuating pressure induced by blade-vortex interaction , 2011 .

[55]  Hao Ying,et al.  General SISO Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems with linear rule consequent are universal approximators , 1998, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[56]  Hui Chen,et al.  A neural networks based model for rate-dependent hysteresis for piezoceramic actuators , 2008 .

[57]  Luc Dupré,et al.  Modeling of quasistatic magnetic hysteresis with feed-forward neural networks , 2001 .

[58]  David C. Zimmerman,et al.  An implicit method for the nonlinear modelling and simulation of piezoceramic actuators displaying hysteresis , 1991 .

[59]  Yonghong Tan,et al.  Modeling of hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators using neural networks , 2009 .

[60]  Ali Ghaffari,et al.  A combination of linear and nonlinear activation functions in neural networks for modeling a de-superheater , 2009, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[61]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Robust Adaptive Constrained Motion Tracking Control of Piezo-Actuated Flexure-Based Mechanisms for Micro/Nano Manipulation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.