Differential interaction of spin-labeled arrestin with inactive and active phosphorhodopsin.

Arrestins regulate signaling and trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors by virtue of their preferential binding to the phosphorylated active form of the receptor. To identify sites in arrestin involved in receptor interaction, a nitroxide-containing side chain was introduced at each of 28 different positions in visual arrestin, and the dynamics of the side chain was used to monitor arrestin interaction with phosphorylated forms of its cognate receptor, rhodopsin. At physiological concentrations, visual arrestin associates with both inactive dark phosphorylated rhodopsin (P-Rh) and light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin (P-Rh*). Residues distributed over the concave surfaces of the two arrestin domains are involved in weak interactions with both states of phosphorhodopsin, and the flexible C-terminal sequence (C-tail) of arrestin becomes dynamically disordered in both complexes. A large-scale movement of the C-tail is demonstrated by direct distance measurements using a doubly labeled arrestin with one nitroxide in the C-tail and the other in the N-domain. Despite some overlap, the molecular "footprint" of arrestin bound to P-Rh and P-Rh* is different, showing the structure of the complexes to be unique. Strong immobilizing interactions with residues in a highly flexible loop between beta-strands V and VI are only observed in complex with the activated state. This result identifies this loop as a key recognition site in the arrestin-P-Rh* complex and supports the view that flexible sequences are key elements in protein-protein interactions.

[1]  V. Gurevich,et al.  The Differential Engagement of Arrestin Surface Charges by the Various Functional Forms of the Receptor* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  R B Sutton,et al.  Crystal structure of cone arrestin at 2.3A: evolution of receptor specificity. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  W. Hubbell,et al.  Mapping of the docking of SecA onto the chaperone SecB by site-directed spin labeling: insight into the mechanism of ligand transfer during protein export. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Robert J. Lefkowitz,et al.  Transduction of Receptor Signals by ß-Arrestins , 2005, Science.

[5]  W. Smith,et al.  Dynamics of Arrestin-Rhodopsin Interactions , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Jimmy B. Feix,et al.  SDSL: A Survey of Biological Applications , 2005 .

[7]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  Activation-dependent Conformational Changes in β-Arrestin 2* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  W. Hubbell,et al.  Motion of spin label side chains in cellular retinol-binding protein: correlation with structure and nearest-neighbor interactions in an antiparallel beta-sheet. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[9]  V. Gurevich,et al.  The molecular acrobatics of arrestin activation. , 2004, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[10]  J. Benovic,et al.  Mapping the Arrestin-Receptor Interface , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  V. Gurevich,et al.  The new face of active receptor bound arrestin attracts new partners. , 2003, Structure.

[12]  V. Gurevich,et al.  The interaction with the cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin plays a crucial role in arrestin activation and binding , 2003, Journal of neurochemistry.

[13]  V. Gurevich,et al.  Transition of Arrestin into the Active Receptor-binding State Requires an Extended Interdomain Hinge* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Linda Columbus,et al.  A new spin on protein dynamics. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[15]  A. Dinculescu,et al.  Insertional Mutagenesis and Immunochemical Analysis of Visual Arrestin Interaction with Rhodopsin* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  K. Hideg,et al.  Estimation of inter-residue distances in spin labeled proteins at physiological temperatures: experimental strategies and practical limitations. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[17]  P. Sigler,et al.  Crystal structure of beta-arrestin at 1.9 A: possible mechanism of receptor binding and membrane Translocation. , 2001, Structure.

[18]  C. Schubert,et al.  An Additional Phosphate-binding Element in Arrestin Molecule , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  T. Fischer,et al.  Interactions of Metarhodopsin II , 2000, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  David S. Cafiso,et al.  Identifying conformational changes with site-directed spin labeling , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[21]  J. Benovic,et al.  [29] Arrestin: Mutagenesis, expression, purification, and functional characterization , 2000 .

[22]  H. Khorana,et al.  Structural features of the C-terminal domain of bovine rhodopsin: a site-directed spin-labeling study. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[23]  P B Sigler,et al.  How Does Arrestin Respond to the Phosphorylated State of Rhodopsin?* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Binding of arrestin to cytoplasmic loop mutants of bovine rhodopsin. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[25]  P. Sigler,et al.  A Model for Arrestin’s Regulation: The 2.8 Å Crystal Structure of Visual Arrestin , 1999, Cell.

[26]  V. Gurevich The Selectivity of Visual Arrestin for Light-activated Phosphorhodopsin Is Controlled by Multiple Nonredundant Mechanisms* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Functional differences in the interaction of arrestin and its splice variant, p44, with rhodopsin. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[28]  P. Detwiler,et al.  Arrestin with a single amino acid substitution quenches light-activated rhodopsin in a phosphorylation-independent fashion. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[29]  J. Benovic,et al.  Mechanism of phosphorylation-recognition by visual arrestin and the transition of arrestin into a high affinity binding state. , 1997, Molecular pharmacology.

[30]  D. Cafiso,et al.  Defining protein-protein interactions using site-directed spin-labeling: the binding of protein kinase C substrates to calmodulin. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[31]  K. Hideg,et al.  Motion of spin-labeled side chains in T4 lysozyme. Correlation with protein structure and dynamics. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[32]  V. Gurevich Use of bacteriophage RNA polymerase in RNA synthesis. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[33]  J. Benovic,et al.  Visual Arrestin Binding to Rhodopsin , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  J L Benovic,et al.  Arrestin Interactions with G Protein-coupled Receptors , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  T. Kieselbach,et al.  A segment corresponding to amino acids Val170-Arg182 of bovine arrestin is capable of binding to phosphorylated rhodopsin. , 1994, European journal of biochemistry.

[36]  J. Benovic,et al.  Visual arrestin binding to rhodopsin. Intramolecular interaction between the basic N terminus and acidic C terminus of arrestin may regulate binding selectivity. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[37]  H. Hamm,et al.  Arrestin-rhodopsin interaction. Multi-site binding delineated by peptide inhibition. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[38]  J L Benovic,et al.  Visual arrestin interaction with rhodopsin. Sequential multisite binding ensures strict selectivity toward light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[39]  J L Benovic,et al.  Cell-free expression of visual arrestin. Truncation mutagenesis identifies multiple domains involved in rhodopsin interaction. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Phosphorylated rhodopsin and heparin induce similar conformational changes in arrestin. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  K. Hofmann,et al.  Kinetics, binding constant, and activation energy of the 48-kDa protein-rhodopsin complex by extra-metarhodopsin II. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[42]  H. Hamm,et al.  Protein complement of rod outer segments of frog retina. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[43]  S. W. Hall,et al.  Light‐induced binding of 48‐kDa protein to photoreceptor membranes is highly enhanced by phosphorylation of rhodopsin , 1984, FEBS letters.