Effects of complexity on the success of temporary organizations: Relationship quality and transparency as substitutes for formal coordination mechanisms

Abstract The organizational literature has considered complexity as an important factor influencing organizations. More recently, the degree of dissemination of temporary organizations (TOs) increased and today TOs can be found in almost every industry. This corresponds to an augmenting treatment in the literature where TOs are often described as appropriate means to cope with complexity. Yet, few empirical studies to date have analyzed the effects of complexity on the success of TOs. This paper considers three prevalent types of complexity (structural, task, temporal) and integrates two factors (relationship quality, transparency) which are hypothesized to mediate the influence of complexity on the efficiency and effectiveness of TOs. We test the hypothesis using a sample of knowledge-intensive consulting projects. The results show that TOs possess a high degree of “complexity resistance” and are therefore particularly suited for solving unique and complex problems. Of the three types of complexity considered, only structural complexity significantly influences efficiency and effectiveness of TOs. Relationship quality and transparency act as mediators on this effect and can be used to mitigate negative effects of complexity.

[1]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[2]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[3]  David Wilemon,et al.  Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects , 2003 .

[4]  D. P. Leyden,et al.  Familiarity and Group Productivity , 1991 .

[5]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  An empirical study of the relationships among co-location, integration, performance, and satisfaction , 1997 .

[6]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[7]  D. Campbell.  Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[8]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research , 2001 .

[10]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  HRM in project groups: The effect of project duration on team development effectiveness , 2010 .

[11]  L. Kirsch.  The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[12]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Progressing to the Center: Coordinating Project Work , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Building collaborative cross-functional new product teams , 1999 .

[14]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  On the Novelty Dimension in Project Management , 2006 .

[15]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[16]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[17]  Kaj U. Koskinen,et al.  Knowledge Management in Project-Based Companies: An Organic Perspective , 2008 .

[18]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Toward a typological theory of project management , 1996 .

[19]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[20]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[21]  D. Hodgson.  Project Work: The Legacy of Bureaucratic Control in the Post-Bureaucratic Organization , 2004 .

[22]  Terry Williams,et al.  The Need for New Paradigms for Complex Projects , 1999 .

[23]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[24]  Dov Dvir,et al.  Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success , 2004 .

[25]  M. Hobday.  The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[26]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[27]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[28]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Software Project Coordination , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Anurag Sharma.  Professional as Agent: Knowledge Asymmetry in Agency Exchange , 1997 .

[30]  Wolfram Elsner.  The “new” economy: complexity, coordination and a hybrid governance approach , 2004 .

[31]  Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal,et al.  Understanding project complexity: implications on project management , 2008, Kybernetes.

[32]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[33]  D. Hodgson,et al.  The Politics of Standards in Modern Management: Making the Project a Reality , 2007 .

[34]  J. R. Turner,et al.  Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them , 1993 .

[35]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[36]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration in High‐Technology New Product Development Processes , 1998 .

[37]  Adam Collins,et al.  PROJECT SUCCESS — A SURVEY , 2004 .

[38]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[39]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept , 2001 .

[40]  Henri C. Dekker,et al.  Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements , 2004 .

[41]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[42]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Unpacking the Client(s): Constructions, Positions and Client-Consultant Dynamics , 2009 .

[43]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[44]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Neo-Industrial Organising: Renewal by Action and Knowledge Formation in a Project-intensive Economy , 1999 .

[45]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[46]  P CachonGérard,et al.  Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999 .

[47]  R. Müller,et al.  The impact of principal–agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager , 2005 .

[48]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[49]  R. Keller,et al.  Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1994 .

[50]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[51]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Timothy J. Kloppenborg,et al.  The Current State of Project Management Research: Trends, Interpretations, and Predictions , 2002 .

[53]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Political Hybrids: Tocquevillean Views on Project Organizations , 2004 .

[54]  Richard F. Deckro,et al.  The social psychology of project management conflict , 1993 .

[55]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[56]  K. Clark,et al.  Lead time in automobile product development explaining the Japanese advantage , 1989 .

[57]  Simon Peck,et al.  Corporate Restructuring and New Forms of Organising: Evidence from Europe , 1999 .

[58]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[59]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Studying organizations as temporary , 2003 .

[60]  R. Goodman,et al.  Some Management Issues in Temporary Systems: A Study of Professional Development and Manpower--The Theater Case. , 1976 .

[61]  R. Katz.  The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[62]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1994 .

[63]  Dov Dvir,et al.  In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors , 1998 .

[64]  Damian Hodgson,et al.  Project management behind the facade , 2009 .

[65]  Johann Packendorff,et al.  INQUIRING INTO THE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[66]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[67]  C. S Lim,et al.  Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination , 1999 .

[68]  H. Volberda,et al.  On the Evolution of Trust, Distrust, and Formal Coordination and Control in Interorganizational Relationships , 2006 .

[69]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[70]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  New Organizational Forms and Strategies for Managing in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[71]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[72]  A. Wald,et al.  Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations , 2011 .

[73]  N. Luhmann.  Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives , 2000 .

[74]  David England,et al.  Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years , 2006 .

[75]  Gernot Grabher.  Temporary Architectures of Learning: Knowledge Governance in Project Ecologies , 2004 .

[76]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2010 .

[77]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[78]  Bastian Hanisch,et al.  A Project Management Research Framework Integrating Multiple Theoretical Perspectives and Influencing Factors , 2011 .

[79]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[80]  Tomas Müllern,et al.  A contextual understanding of projects--The importance of space and time , 2009 .

[81]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[82]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[83]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[84]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[85]  Beth A. Bechky.  Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[86]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[87]  Rosalie L. Tung.  Dimensions of Organizational Environments: An Exploratory Study of Their Impact on Organization Structure , 1979 .

[88]  R. Bakker,et al.  Research on temporary organizations : the state of the art and distinct approaches toward “temporariness” , 2009 .

[89]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[90]  Anton de Wit,et al.  Measurement of project success , 1988 .

[91]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications , 1975 .

[92]  R. Müller,et al.  Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent , 2004 .

[93]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .

[94]  Kamalesh Kumar,et al.  Differences in decision making regarding risk taking: A comparison of culturally diverse and culturally homogeneous task groups , 1992 .

[95]  P. Adler.  Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism , 2001 .

[96]  Sally Blount,et al.  When Plans Change: Examining How People Evaluate Timing Changes in Work Organizations , 2001 .

[97]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[98]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[99]  K. Clark.  Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[100]  D. R. Dalton,et al.  Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review , 1980 .

[101]  David Baccarini,et al.  The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success , 1999 .

[102]  Stan Xiao Li,et al.  Reputation, Diversification and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[103]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[104]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Evolution of Project as Empirical Trend and Theoretical Focus , 1998 .

[105]  Pirooz Vakili,et al.  On the Value of Flexibility in R&D Projects , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[106]  Chris Ivory,et al.  Can Project Management Learn Anything from Studies of Failure in Complex Systems? , 2005 .

[107]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[108]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[109]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[110]  Indre Maurer.  How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation , 2010 .

[111]  R. Bakker.  Taking Stock of Temporary Organizational Forms : A Systematic Review and Research , 2010 .

[112]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects , 2011 .

[113]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[114]  Nina Modig,et al.  A continuum of organizations formed to carry out projects: Temporary and stationary organization forms , 2007 .

[115]  Steven H. Appelbaum,et al.  The critical success factors in the client‐consulting relationship , 2005 .

[116]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management: A Long-Term Research Agenda on Temporary Organizational Forms , 2011 .

[117]  R. Defillippi,et al.  Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial , 2004 .

[118]  C. Midler.  “Projectification” of the firm: The renault case , 1995 .

[119]  Lynn Crawford,et al.  Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management , 2006 .

[120]  Sue Newell,et al.  Project social capital, leadership and trust , 2007 .

[121]  Andreas Wald,et al.  Relational competence in complex temporary organizations: The case of a French hospital construction project network , 2013 .

[122]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[123]  David C. Croson,et al.  Information Policy: Shaping the Value of Agency Relationships , 2001 .

[124]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[125]  L. Argote.  Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components , 1993 .

[126]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[127]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[128]  Cynthia Clark Williams,et al.  Trust Diffusion: The Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Structure, Function, and Organizational Transparency , 2005 .

[129]  R. Katz,et al.  Project Performance and the Locus of Influence in the R&d Matrix , 2015 .

[130]  Kamalesh Kumar,et al.  Process gain and process loss: Comparing interpersonal processes and performance of culturally diverse and non-diverse teams across time , 1998 .

[131]  B. Aubert,et al.  Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams , 2003 .

[132]  Mark Vandenbosch,et al.  Project Complexity and Efforts to Reduce Product Development Cycle Time , 1999 .

[133]  Thomas Armbrüster,et al.  Bridging Uncertainty in Management Consulting: The Mechanisms of Trust and Networked Reputation , 2003 .

[134]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technical Communication in R & D Laboratories: The Impact of Project Work Characteristics , 1978 .

[135]  Antecedents and Consequences of Team Stability on New Product Development Performance , 2002 .

[136]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[137]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[138]  Tomas Müllern,et al.  A Grammar of Organizing , 2007 .

[139]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[140]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[141]  J. Bishop,et al.  Support, Commitment, and Employee Outcomes in a Team Environment , 2000 .

[142]  H. Maylor.  Beyond the Gantt chart:: Project management moving on , 2001 .

[143]  L. Argote.  Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[144]  Benoit Morel,et al.  Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: the Dynamics of Organizations As Adaptive and Evolving Systems , 1999 .