Exploring the Use of Discussion Strategies and Labels in Asynchronous Online Discussion

Drawing on research in both constrained online discussion environments and strategy instruction, this approach combines explicit instruction on discussion strategies with the use of post type labels. In a trial of this approach in an online course, students actively used the discussion strategies and post type labels in their discussion. Analysis of student posts and survey responses suggested that students in the experimental group used discussion strategies more frequently after the intervention as compared to the control group and perceived that this approach positively impacted their discussions. In addition, there is a certain degree of improvement in the quality of discussion measured by Gunawardena, Lowe and Anderson’s (1997) critical analysis model.

[1]  Armin Weinberger,et al.  Promoting critical, elaborative discussions through a collaboration script and argument diagrams , 2014 .

[2]  Jenny Thomas,et al.  Exploring the use of asynchronous online discussion in health care education: A literature review , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  College students' experience of online argumentation: Conceptions, approaches and the conditions of using question prompts , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Chiung-Hui Chiu,et al.  Employing a structured interface to advance primary students' communicative competence in a text-based computer mediated environment , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Jim Hewitt,et al.  Exploring asynchronous and synchronous tool use in online courses , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers,et al.  An Analysis of Asynchronous Discussions: A Case Study of Graduate Student Participation in Online Debates. , 2012 .

[7]  Janet Mannheimer Zydney,et al.  Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Daryl F. Mellard,et al.  Efficacy of Learning Strategies Instruction in Adult Education , 2011, Journal of research on educational effectiveness.

[9]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines , 2010 .

[10]  Sunghee Shin,et al.  The effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on students' interactions during asynchronous online discussions , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[11]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Strategy instruction in writing for adult literacy learners , 2009 .

[12]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[13]  Jennifer Hayes,et al.  Ask and you will receive: how question type influences quantity and quality of online discussions , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Joyce McCauley,et al.  Shouting through the fingertips: Computer-mediated discourse in an asynchronous environment , 2008 .

[15]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Instructor Modeling and Online Question Prompts for Supporting Peer-Questioning during Online Discussion , 2008 .

[16]  K. Seo.  Utilizing Peer Moderating in Online Discussions: Addressing the Controversy between Teacher Moderation and Nonmoderation , 2007 .

[17]  Sangchul Oh,et al.  Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[18]  Sunyoung Joung,et al.  Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Using Peer Feedback to Enhance the Quality of Student Online Postings: An Exploratory Study , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Genevieve Marie Johnson,et al.  Online Study Groups: Reciprocal Peer Questioning versus Mnemonic Devices , 2006 .

[21]  Steve Graham,et al.  Strategy Instruction and the Teaching of Writing: A Meta-Analysis. , 2006 .

[22]  Daryl F. Mellard,et al.  Feasibility of Explicit Instruction in Adult Basic Education: Instructor-Learner Interaction Patterns , 2006 .

[23]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Online Discussion Participation Protocols , 2005 .

[24]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  The Effect of Context-Based Video Instruction on Learning and Motivation in Online Courses , 2005 .

[25]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding Peer-questioning Strategies to Facilitate Metacognition During Online Small Group Discussion , 2005 .

[26]  Timothy J. Newby,et al.  Using Socratic Questioning to Promote Critical Thinking Skills Through Asynchronous Discussion Forums in Distance Learning Environments , 2005 .

[27]  E. Michael Nussbaum,et al.  The effect of goal instructions and need for cognition on interactive argumentation , 2005 .

[28]  A. U. Chamot.  LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION: CURRENT ISSUES AND RESEARCH , 2005, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[29]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[30]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Personality Interactions and Scaffolding in On-Line Discussions , 2004 .

[31]  M. J. W. Thomas,et al.  Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[32]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences , 2002, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[33]  Bruce E. Larson,et al.  Classroom Discussion and Threaded Electronic Discussion: Learning In Two Arenas , 2002 .

[34]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum , 2000 .

[35]  Robert Tinker,et al.  Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators , 2000 .

[36]  M. Linn,et al.  Teaching science through online, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the Knowledge Integration Environment , 2000 .

[37]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[38]  M. Banerjee,et al.  Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures , 1999 .

[39]  T. Anderson,et al.  Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction , 1998 .

[40]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[41]  Terry Anderson,et al.  The Virtual Conference: Extending Professional Education in Cyberspace , 1996 .

[42]  P. V. Meter,et al.  A Quasi-experimental Validation of Transactional Strategies Instruction with Low-Achieving Second-Grade Readers. , 1996 .

[43]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education , 1995 .

[44]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[45]  A. King,et al.  Effects of Guided Cooperative Questioning on Children's Knowledge Construction. , 1993 .

[46]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Encouraging Mindful Use of Prior Knowledge: Attempting to Construct Explanatory Answers Facilitates Learning , 1992 .

[47]  A. King.  Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance , 1991 .

[48]  D. Jonassen.  Evaluating constructivistic learning , 1991 .

[49]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Cognitive Strategy Instruction that Really Improves Children's Academic Performance. Cognitive Strategy Training Series. Second Edition. , 1990 .

[50]  A. King.  Enhancing Peer Interaction and Learning in the Classroom Through Reciprocal Questioning , 1990 .

[51]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  Improving Reading Instruction through the Use of Responsive Elaboration. , 1987 .

[52]  M. Pressley.  The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics. , 1986 .

[53]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[54]  D. Deshler,et al.  Academic and Cognitive Interventions for LD Adolescents , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[55]  J. T. Dillon.  Research on Questioning and Discussion. , 1984 .

[56]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Teaching of Learning Strategies. , 1983 .