Towards improving the utilization of university teaching space

There is a perception that teaching space in universities is a rather scarce resource. However, some studies have revealed that in many institutions it is actually chronically under-used. Often, rooms are occupied only half the time, and even when in use they are often only half full. This is usually measured by the ‘utilization’ which is defined as the percentage of available ‘seat-hours’ that are employed. Within real institutions, studies have shown that this utilization can often take values as low as 20–40%. One consequence of such a low level of utilization is that space managers are under pressure to make more efficient use of the available teaching space. However, better management is hampered because there does not appear to be a good understanding within space management (near-term planning) of why this happens. This is accompanied, within space planning (long-term planning) by a lack of experise on how best to accommodate the expected low utilizations. This motivates our two main goals: (i) To understand the factors that drive down utilizations, (ii) To set up methods to provide better space planning. Here, we provide quantitative evidence that constraints arising from timetabling and location requirements easily have the potential to explain the low utilizations seen in reality. Furthermore, on considering the decision question ‘Can this given set of courses all be allocated in the available teaching space?’ we find that the answer depends on the associated utilization in a way that exhibits threshold behaviour: There is a sharp division between regions in which the answer is ‘almost always yes’ and those of ‘almost always no’. Through analysis and understanding of the space of potential solutions, our work suggests that better use of space within universities will come about through an understanding of the effects of timetabling constraints and when it is statistically likely that it will be possible for a set of courses to be allocated to a particular space. The results presented here provide a firm foundation for university managers to take decisions on how space should be managed and planned for more effectively. Our multi-criteria approach and new methodology together provide new insight into the interaction between the course timetabling problem and the crucial issue of space planning.

[1]  Robert Jacobs,et al.  A Multiple Objective Approach to Space Planning for Academic Facilities , 1979 .

[2]  S. Thomas McCormick,et al.  Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization , 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Philippe Fortemps,et al.  Performance of the MOSA Method for the Bicriteria Assignment Problem , 2000, J. Heuristics.

[4]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[5]  D. de Werra,et al.  An introduction to timetabling , 1985 .

[6]  Graham Kendall,et al.  Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques , 2013 .

[7]  Andrea Schaerf,et al.  A Survey of Automated Timetabling , 1999, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[8]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Hard and Easy Distributions of SAT Problems , 1992, AAAI.

[9]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[10]  Jacques Carlier,et al.  Handbook of Scheduling - Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Sanja Petrovic,et al.  University Timetabling , 2004, Handbook of Scheduling.

[12]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Recent Developments in Practical Course Timetabling , 1997, PATAT.

[13]  Ben Paechter,et al.  A Comparison of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics on the Timetabling Problem , 2002, PATAT.

[14]  Peter C. Cheeseman,et al.  Where the Really Hard Problems Are , 1991, IJCAI.

[15]  Victor A. Bardadym Computer-Aided School and University Timetabling: The New Wave , 1995, PATAT.

[16]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Phase Transitions in Artificial Intelligence Systems , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Kieron Flanagan,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Purchase, Management and Use of Large-scale Research Equipment in the UK and US Universities (report for Evidence Ltd on behalf of the Higher Education Funding Council for England) , 2002 .

[18]  Yuri Bykov The Description of the Algorithm for International Timetabling Competition , 2003 .

[19]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[20]  Steven Swanson,et al.  Scheduling Classes on a College Campus , 2000, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[21]  Andrew J. Parkes Scaling Properties of Pure Random Walk on Random 3-SAT , 2002, CP.

[22]  Luca Di Gaspero,et al.  Timetabling Competition TTComp 2002: Solver Description , 2003 .

[23]  Sanja Petrovic,et al.  A time-predefined approach to course timetabling , 2003 .

[24]  G. Dueck New optimization heuristics , 1993 .

[25]  Xavier Gandibleux,et al.  The Supported Solutions Used as a Genetic Information in a Population Heuristics , 2001, EMO.

[26]  Luca Di Gaspero,et al.  A Multineighbourhood Local Search Solver for the Timetabling Competition TTComp 2002 , 2004 .

[27]  Philipp Kostuch,et al.  The University Course Timetabling Problem with a Three-Phase Approach , 2004, PATAT.

[28]  Michael W. Carter,et al.  When Is the Classroom Assignment Problem Hard? , 1992, Oper. Res..

[29]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling IV , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[30]  Igor Vasil'ev,et al.  A Computational Study of a Cutting Plane Algorithm for University Course Timetabling , 2005, J. Sched..

[31]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  Understanding the Role of UFOs Within Space Exploitation , 2006 .

[32]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[33]  Mauro Birattari,et al.  An effective hybrid algorithm for university course timetabling , 2006, J. Sched..

[34]  Landa Silva,et al.  Metaheuristic and Multiobjective Approaches for Space Allocation , 2003 .

[35]  G. Nemhauser,et al.  Integer Programming , 2020 .

[36]  Peter Ross,et al.  The Phase-Transition Niche for Evolutionary Algorithms in Timetabling , 1995, PATAT.

[37]  Joseph Y.-T. Leung,et al.  Handbook of Scheduling: Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis , 2004 .

[38]  E. D. Giorgi Selected Papers , 2006 .

[39]  Sanja Petrovic,et al.  Recent research directions in automated timetabling , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  The Teaching Space Allocation Problem with Splitting , 2006, PATAT.