AIS Electronic Library (AISeL

Rapid advances in IT combined with increasing awareness for environmental side-effects of modern economies are causing a shift in the consumer behavior towards new forms of consumption. Private individuals increasingly become both providers and consumers of services. Web 2.0 enables peer-topeer transactions between consumers creating a new consumption space with hundreds of mediator platforms. While the new legally questionable market is typically seen as a challenge by governments, the opportunities for governments to participate in peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing and collaborative consumption services (SCCS) for their citizens are hardly explored in academia. In contrast, first pioneer governments such as the cities of Seoul and San Francisco have already developed strategies to support the development of P2P SCCS for their citizens. In this work, we advocate for extending the function scope of e-government by including P2P SCCS into its portfolio. To support our reasoning and in order to systematically address the problem area emerging from the combination of e-government and P2P SCCS, we review and synthesize e-government models and relate them to the P2P SCCS phenomenon. Our results reveal what constitutes a research agenda for utilizing potentials of P2P SCCS in the context of e-government research and practice.

[1]  KenThomasMichael F. ConcaPrincenManiates Confronting Consumption , 2001, Global Environmental Politics.

[2]  R. Belk Why Not Share Rather Than Own? , 2007 .

[3]  Karl Reiner Lang,et al.  Electronic Market Design Principles in the Context of Peer-to-Peer Filesharing Systems , 2005, PACIS.

[4]  A. Sharif Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy , 2008 .

[5]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Identifying Factors of E-Government Acceptance - A Literature Review , 2012, ICIS.

[6]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model , 2006, MIS Q..

[8]  Yu Chen,et al.  Possession and access : consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits , 2009 .

[9]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Albert Meijer,et al.  Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a Government-Centric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support. , 2011 .

[12]  Anders Hjalmarsson,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Service Sharing Platforms: Driving Share and Share Alike on a Mass-Scale , 2013, ICIS.

[13]  Meghan A. Harris The Ethics of Interpersonal Relationships , 2009 .

[14]  Z. Fang E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development , 2002 .

[15]  Arvind Malhotra,et al.  The dark side of the sharing economy … and how to lighten it , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[16]  Oksana Mont,et al.  Clarifying the Concept of Product-Service System , 2002 .

[17]  R. Basselier,et al.  The Rise of the Sharing Economy , 2023, BCP Business & Management.

[18]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Models for e‐government , 2007 .

[21]  Lisa Gansky,et al.  The Mesh: Why the Future of Business Is Sharing , 2010 .

[22]  Nicholas A. John The Social Logics of Sharing , 2013 .

[23]  Catherine Needham Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services , 2008, Social Policy and Society.

[24]  Andreas Wittel,et al.  Qualities of sharing and their transformations in the digital age , 2011 .

[25]  David H. Coursey,et al.  Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment , 2008 .

[26]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Characterizing eParticipation , 2007, International Journal of Information Management.

[27]  Sevgi Özkan,et al.  e-Government adoption model based on theory of planned behavior: Empirical validation , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  R. Belk You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online , 2014 .

[29]  Laszlo Zsolnai,et al.  Collaborative Enterprise and Sustainability: The Case of Slow Food , 2012 .

[30]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  The diffusion of electronic service delivery innovations in dutch E-policing: The case of digital warning systems , 2008 .

[31]  Y. Benkler 'Sharing Nicely': On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production , 2004 .

[32]  N. Oreskes The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change , 2004, Science.

[33]  Andrew Whinston,et al.  To Continue Sharing or Not to Continue Sharing? – An Empirical Analysis of User Decision in Peer-to-Peer Sharing Networks , 2007 .

[34]  France Bélanger,et al.  A framework for e-government: privacy implications , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[35]  Holger Rohn,et al.  Collaborative consumption : towards a resource-saving consumption culture , 2013 .

[36]  Deron Liang,et al.  Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  Nigel P. Melville,et al.  Spurring impactful research on information systems for environmental sustainability , 2013 .

[38]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[39]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[40]  H. Heinrichs,et al.  Sharing Economy: Towards a New Culture of Consumption? , 2013 .

[41]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[42]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Evaluating trust in peer-to-peer service provider communities , 2011, 7th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom).

[44]  N. Oreskes Beyond the ivory tower. The scientific consensus on climate change. , 2004, Science.

[45]  S. Schneider,et al.  Expert credibility in climate change , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[47]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[48]  Andrea Botero,et al.  Towards Peer-production in Public Services: cases from Finland , 2012 .

[49]  John L. Florell,et al.  Sharing , 1979 .

[50]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Modernizing Processes in Public Administrations: Process Management in the Age of e-Government and New Public Management , 2011 .

[51]  Steve Elliot,et al.  Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability: A Resource Base and Framework for IT-Enabled Business Transformation , 2011, MIS Q..

[52]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of U.S. counties’ e-Government portals: development status and functionalities , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[54]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[55]  Omer F. Rana,et al.  Trading Service Level Agreements within a Peer-to-Peer market , 2010, 2010 11th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing.

[56]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda , 2007 .

[57]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[58]  J. Kassan,et al.  The LEGAL Landscape of the Sharing Economy , 2012 .

[59]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.

[60]  Giana M. Eckhardt,et al.  Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing , 2012 .

[61]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[62]  Gordon P. Whitaker Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery , 1980 .

[63]  Yurong Yao,et al.  Remote electronic voting systems: an exploration of voters' perceptions and intention to use , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[64]  John F. Affisco,et al.  E-government: a strategic operations management framework for service delivery , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[65]  Yuan Long,et al.  Synthesizing e-government stage models - a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[66]  Joao Correia,et al.  Improving trust using online credibility sources and social network quality in P2P marketplaces , 2013, 2013 8th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).

[67]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[68]  R. Belk Sharing Versus Pseudo-Sharing in Web 2.0 , 2014 .