Statistical evaluation of data requirement for ramp metering performance assessment

Ramp metering is known to be an effective freeway control measure that ensures the overall efficiency and safety of a highway system by regulating the inflow traffic on-ramps. Therefore, agencies are required to frequently assess the performance of their ramp meters. However, one major challenge for the agencies conducting ramp metering performance assessments is the lack of knowledge about data requirements. Data requirements consist of the information regarding the duration of data collection for accommodation time (the time needed for the users to get familiar with the change) and for the evaluation time. In this paper, a non-parametric statistic approach is proposed that is robust to the underlying distribution of the random variable. Meaning that the accuracy of the model is insensitive to the data distribution. For validation purposes, three active ramps along State Route 51, in the Phoenix Metropolitan area, Arizona are selected as the case study. ADOT altered their ramp control strategy from fixed-time to responsive control and is attempting to know the extent of data required for assessing its new ramp metering strategy. For this particular case study, the results suggest that two months’ worth of data is the minimum data sufficient for a ramp metering assessment. The proposed assessment approach can be transferred to other ramp metering applications to help traffic engineers efficiently tune up ramp metering strategies.

[1]  Praveen Edara,et al.  Evaluation of Temporary Ramp Metering for Work Zones , 2013 .

[2]  Xuegang Ban,et al.  Short-term traffic state prediction from latent structures: Accuracy vs. efficiency , 2020 .

[3]  George F. List,et al.  Modeling and Evaluating Traffic Flow at Sag Curves When Imposing Variable Speed Limits on Connected Vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[4]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Using Kalman filter algorithm for short-term traffic flow prediction in a connected vehicle environment , 2019, Journal of Modern Transportation.

[5]  David M Levinson,et al.  Ramp Meters on Trial: Evidence from the Twin Cities Metering Holiday , 2006 .

[6]  Yuchuan Du,et al.  Understanding the Distribution Characteristics of Bus Speed Based on Geocoded Data , 2017 .

[7]  Rohana J. Karunamuni,et al.  On boundary correction in kernel density estimation , 2005 .

[8]  D. Brillinger,et al.  Handbook of methods of applied statistics , 1967 .

[9]  Will Recker,et al.  Performance evaluation of adaptive ramp-metering algorithms using microscopic traffic simulation model , 2004 .

[10]  H. Oliver Gao,et al.  Methods of analysis for vehicle soak time data , 2009 .

[11]  Rob M.P. Goverde,et al.  Modeling railway disruption lengths with Copula Bayesian Networks , 2016 .

[12]  Keqin Li,et al.  Stop-and-Wait: Discover Aggregation Effect Based on Private Car Trajectory Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Quantifying effects of ramp metering on freeway safety. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Marco Guerrieri,et al.  Capacity and safety analysis of hard-shoulder running (HSR). A motorway case study , 2016 .

[15]  Chang Liu,et al.  How Much Data Are Enough? A Statistical Approach With Case Study on Longitudinal Driving Behavior , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

[16]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Freeway ramp metering: an overview , 2002, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[17]  Giuseppe Musolino,et al.  Effects of traffic control regulation on Network Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram: A statistical analysis of real data , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[18]  John Hourdos,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of new integrated freeway ramp control strategy , 2006 .

[19]  M. C. Jones,et al.  Simple boundary correction for kernel density estimation , 1993 .

[20]  Arif S. Malik,et al.  Travel Time Reliability Using the Hasofer–Lind–Rackwitz–Fiessler Algorithm and Kernel Density Estimation , 2014 .

[21]  Yao-Jan Wu,et al.  Hybrid data‐driven approach for truck travel time imputation , 2019, IET Intelligent Transport Systems.

[22]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Evaluation of ramp control algorithms using microscopic traffic simulation , 2002 .

[23]  S. Travis Waller,et al.  Developing a disaggregate travel demand system of models using data mining techniques , 2017 .

[24]  David M Levinson,et al.  Ramp Metering and Freeway Bottleneck Capacity , 2009 .

[25]  Peter Malec,et al.  Nonparametric Kernel Density Estimation Near the Boundary , 2013, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[26]  Osama A. Osman,et al.  Long-term evaluation of the operational performance of fixed time ramp metering control strategy: a freeway corridor study , 2015 .

[27]  T. Yai,et al.  An Analysis on Efficiency and Equity of Fixed-Time Ramp Metering , 2013 .

[28]  Hadi Sadoghi Yazdi,et al.  Introducing prior knowledge for a hybrid accident prediction model , 2017 .

[29]  Habib Haj-Salem,et al.  Field Evaluation Results of new Isolated and Coordinated Ramp Metering Strategies in France , 2012 .

[30]  Ali Karimpour,et al.  Online Traffic Prediction Using Time Series: A Case study , 2017 .

[31]  Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh,et al.  NONPARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION OF DAILY ACTIVITY DURATIONS USING KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATORS , 2002 .

[32]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Freeway Corridor Performance Before and After Systemwide Adaptive Ramp Metering System Implementation , 2009 .

[33]  Keechoo Choi,et al.  Driver Behavior and Preferences for Changeable Message Signs and Variable Speed Limits in Reduced Visibility Conditions , 2012, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[34]  H. Tu,et al.  Variations in mode-specific valuations of travel time reliability and in-vehicle crowding: Implications for demand estimation , 2017 .

[35]  Fedel Frank Saccomanno,et al.  Assessing Safety Benefits of Variable Speed Limits , 2004 .

[36]  Shu Yang,et al.  Systematic clustering method to identify and characterise spatiotemporal congestion on freeway corridors , 2018 .

[37]  Zhe Xiao,et al.  Maritime Traffic Probabilistic Forecasting Based on Vessels’ Waterway Patterns and Motion Behaviors , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[38]  M. Stephens.  EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons , 1974 .

[39]  Alexandra Kondyli,et al.  Effect of on-ramp demand and flow distribution on capacity at merge bottleneck locations , 2020 .

[40]  Nicholas J Garber,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS IN CONTROLLING VEHICLE SPEEDS IN WORK ZONES. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .

[41]  Hilmi Berk Celikoglu,et al.  Local Ramp Metering Strategy ALINEA: Microscopic Simulation Based Evaluation Study on Istanbul Freeways , 2017 .

[42]  Meiping Yun,et al.  Minimum Sampling Size of Floating Cars for Urban Link Travel Time Distribution Estimation , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.