Environmental impact of the typical heavy pig production in Italy

The Italian pig sector is mainly focused on the production of heavy pigs used for the traditional dry-cured hams. At slaughter a minimum of 160 kg and 9 months age are required to comply with the production specifications of the ham consortia. Advancing livestock age and increasing fat deposition negatively affect feed conversion ratio, which is one of the main determinants of meat production environmental impact. The aim of the study was to provide a first evaluation of the environmental impact potentials of heavy pig production in Italy through a Life Cycle Assessment approach. Additional objectives were to identify the main hot spots and the most important data gaps in the analysis. A cradle to farm gate Life Cycle Assessment was performed in 6 intensive pig farms located in Northern Italy. Key parameters concerning on-farm activities, inputs and outputs were collected through personal interviews with farmers. The functional unit was 1 kg live weight. Direct land use change was considered in the emissions of imported soybean. The average pig slaughter live weight was 168.7 ± 33.3 kg. Environmental impacts per kg live weight were generally higher than those generated in the production of pigs slaughtered at lower weight. The global warming potential was on average 4.25 ± 1.03 kg CO2 eq/kg live weight. Feed chain (crop production at farm and purchased feed) was the major source of impact for all the categories and the most important hotspot of heavy pig production. Farm size and reproductive efficiency appeared important factors in the environmental burden of heavy pig production: the largest and most efficient farm (as live weight produced per sow) had impact potentials per kg live weight much lower than those generated in the less efficient farm and similar to the ones reported on pigs slaughtered at a lower weight. The wide range of impact values within farms reveals opportunities for environmental improvements in the production of the traditional heavy pig. There is a need for further data and models on methane enteric emissions and nitrogen excretions above 100 kg of live weight.

[1]  Devon E. Worth,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian pork industry , 2009 .

[2]  Eric Johnson.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[3]  K. Grunert,et al.  Consumer satisfaction with dry-cured ham in five European countries. , 2011, Meat science.

[4]  Enteric Methane Emission from Pigs , 2011 .

[5]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of pork production: A data inventory for the case of Germany , 2013 .

[6]  H. M. G. Werf,et al.  The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne , 2005 .

[7]  D. P. L. Fiego,et al.  Influence of genetic type, live weight at slaughter and carcass fatness on fatty acid composition of subcutaneous adipose tissue of raw ham in the heavy pig. , 2005, Meat science.

[8]  J. Ryschawy,et al.  Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[9]  Stephen Wiedemann,et al.  Environmental assessment of two pork supply chains using life cycle assessment , 2010 .

[10]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Nitrogen excretion in dairy cow, beef and veal cattle, pig, and rabbit farms in Northern Italy , 2005 .

[11]  S. Colombini,et al.  Effects of phytase on growth and slaughter performance, digestibility and nitrogen and mineral balance in heavy pigs , 2012 .

[12]  R. C. Ewan.  Predicting the energy utilization of diets and feed ingredients by pigs , 1989 .

[13]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Life cycle assessment of pigmeat production: portuguese case study and proposal of improvement options , 2015 .

[14]  Lisbeth Mogensen,et al.  Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU , 2010 .

[15]  J.G.A.J. van der Vorst,et al.  Towards sustainable food production: a scenario study of the European pork sector , 2011 .

[16]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[17]  G. M. Crovetto,et al.  Trend of energy and nitrogen utilization of high fibre diets in pigs from 100 to 160 kg bodyweight , 2005 .

[18]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from pig and chicken supply chains – a global life cycle assessment , 2013 .

[19]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems , 2007 .

[20]  M. Guerci,et al.  How can farming intensification affect the environmental impact of milk production? , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France , 2005 .

[22]  C Cederberg,et al.  Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[23]  Nathan Pelletier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of high- and low-profitability commodity and deep-bedded niche swine production systems in the Upper Midwestern United States , 2010 .

[24]  R. Dalgaard.  The environmental impact of pork production from a life cycle perspective , 2007 .

[25]  P. Bosi,et al.  The production of the heavy pig for high quality processed products , 2004 .

[26]  I. Kyriazakis,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[27]  M. Latorre,et al.  Effect of gender, terminal sire line and age at slaughter on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of heavy pigs , 2003 .