Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery

Objective: The study was conducted to investigate whether the strength of uterine contractions monitored invasively by intrauterine pressure catheter could be determined from transabdominal electromyography (EMG) and to estimate whether EMG is a better predictor of true labor compared to tocodynamometry (TOCO). Study design: Uterine EMG was recorded from the abdominal surface in laboring patients simultaneously monitored with an intrauterine pressure catheter (n = 13) or TOCO (n = 24). Three to five contractions per patient and corresponding electrical bursts were randomly selected and analyzed (integral of intrauterine pressure; integral, frequency, amplitude of contraction curve on TOCO; burst energy for EMG). The Mann–Whitney test, Spearman correlation and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis were used as appropriate (significance was assumed at a value of p < 0.05). Results: EMG correlated strongly with intrauterine pressure (r = 0.764; p = 0.002). EMG burst energy levels were significantly higher in patients who delivered within 48 h compared to those who delivered later (median [25%/75%]: 96 640 [26 520–322 240] vs. 2960 [1560–10 240]; p < 0.001), whereas none of the TOCO parameters were different. In addition, burst energy levels were highly predictive of delivery within 48 h (AUC = 0.9531; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: EMG measurements correlated strongly with the strength of contractions and therefore may be a valuable alternative to invasive measurement of intrauterine pressure. Unlike TOCO, transabdominal uterine EMG can be used reliably to predict labor and delivery.

[1]  W. Hueston Preterm Contractions in Community Settings: I. Treatment of Preterm Contractions , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  H KURIYAMA,et al.  A study of the parturient uterus with the microelectrode technique. , 1961, Endocrinology.

[4]  R. Garfield,et al.  Myometrial electrophysiologic activity and gap junctions in the pregnant rabbit. , 1984, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  J. Dobbing The current status of fetal heart rate monitoring and ultrasound in obstetrics , 1978 .

[6]  G F Phillips,et al.  Units for the evaluation of uterine contractility , 1987, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  G. Saade,et al.  Methods and Devices for the Management of Term and Preterm Labor , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  P. Nathanielsz,et al.  Electromyographic activity of the nonpregnant and pregnant sheep uterus. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  G. Wolfs,et al.  Electromyographic Observations on the Human Uterus during Labour , 1979, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[10]  P. Nathanielsz,et al.  Alteration of 24-hour rhythms in myometrial activity in the chronically catheterized pregnant rhesus monkey after a 6-hour shift in the light-dark cycle. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  G. Saade,et al.  Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.