Porous substrate affects a subsequent attachment ability of the beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae)

According to literature data, porous substrates can cause a reduction of insect attachment ability. We carried out traction experiments with adult ladybird beetles Harmonia axyridis on the smooth solid glass sample and rough porous Al2O3 membrane to prove the primary effect of absorption of the insect pad secretion by porous media, rather than surface roughness, on the attachment force on the porous sample. With each insect individual, a set of five experiments was conducted: (1) on glass; (2) on the porous membrane; (3–5) on glass immediately after the test on the porous surface, then after 30 min and 1 h of recovery time. On the porous substrate, the forces, being similar in females and males, were greatly reduced compared to those measured on glass. A significant difference between the force values obtained in the first (before the test on the porous sample) and second (immediately after the experiment on the porous sample) tests on glass was observed. After 30 min recovery time, beetles completely regained their attachment ability. Females produced significantly lower forces than males in all experiments on glass: the differences are probably caused by the sexual dimorphism in the microstructure of their adhesive pads. The obtained results are of fundamental importance for further application in biomimetics of novel insect-repelling surfaces and in plant protection by using porous materials.

[1]  S. Gorb,et al.  How do plant waxes cause flies to slide? Experimental tests of wax-based trapping mechanisms in three pitfall carnivorous plants. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[2]  J. Edwards,et al.  The adhesive pads of Heteroptera: a re-examination , 2009 .

[3]  Walter Federle,et al.  Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  Shoziro Ishii,et al.  Adhesion of a Leaf Feeding Ladybird Epilachna vigintioctomaculta (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae) on a Virtically Smooth Surface , 1987 .

[5]  K. Peschke,et al.  Comparison of tarsal and cuticular chemistry in the leaf beetle Gastrophysa viridula (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and an evaluation of solid-phase microextraction and solvent extraction techniques , 2009, Chemoecology.

[6]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Attachment ability of the beetle Chrysolina fastuosa on various plant surfaces , 2002 .

[7]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Effects of surface topography and chemistry of Rumex obtusifolius leaves on the attachment of the beetle Gastrophysa viridula , 2009 .

[8]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Adhesion of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a Variety of Surfaces , 1980 .

[9]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Surface profile and friction force generated by insects , 2004 .

[10]  Hoon Kim,et al.  Microstructure of the biological attachment devices in the ladybug Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) , 2012 .

[11]  A. F. G. Dixon,et al.  The Mechanism by Which Aphids Adhere to Smooth Surfaces , 1990 .

[12]  Daniel J. Aneshansley,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a chrysomelid beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea): characterization of the adhesive oil. , 2000 .

[13]  Ryohei Yamaoka,et al.  Chemical Composition of Footprints and Cuticula Lipids of Three Species of Lady Beetles. , 1996 .

[14]  Walter Federle,et al.  Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  S N Gorb,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the attachment ability of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to rough substrates. , 2008, Journal of insect physiology.

[16]  Jan-Henning Dirks,et al.  Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  S. Gorb,et al.  Composite structure of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on insect attachment , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  S. Gorb,et al.  Oil adsorption ability of three-dimensional epicuticular wax coverages in plants , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  S. Eigenbrode,et al.  Mobility of three generalist predators is greater on cabbage with glossy leaf wax than on cabbage with a wax bloom , 1996 .

[20]  S. Gorb Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[21]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Slippery surfaces of pitcher plants: Nepenthes wax crystals minimize insect attachment via microscopic surface roughness , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  Do plant waxes make insect attachment structures dirty? Experimental evidence for the contamination hypothesis , 2006 .

[23]  S. Gorb,et al.  Variable Attachment to Plant Surface Waxes by Predatory Insects , 2009 .

[24]  T. Eisner,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Walter Federle,et al.  Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Biologically Inspired Mushroom-Shaped Adhesive Microstructures , 2014 .

[27]  S. Gorb,et al.  Adhesion force measurements on the two wax layers of the waxy zone in Nepenthes alata pitchers , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Michael Varenberg,et al.  How tight are beetle hugs? Attachment in mating leaf beetles , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[29]  R. Koch The multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis: A review of its biology, uses in biological control, and non-target impacts , 2003, Journal of insect science.

[30]  S. Gorb,et al.  Surface roughness rather than surface chemistry essentially affects insect adhesion , 2016, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[31]  S. Gorb,et al.  Anti-adhesive effects of plant wax coverage on insect attachment. , 2017, Journal of experimental botany.

[32]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  ROLE OF WAXBLOOMS IN PREVENTING ATTACHMENT TO BRASSICAS BY THE MUSTARD BEETLE, PHAEDON COCHLEARIAE , 1980 .

[33]  S. Gorb Uncovering insect stickiness: structure and properties of hairy attachment devices , 2005 .

[34]  S. Gorb,et al.  Slippery pores: anti-adhesive effect of nanoporous substrates on the beetle attachment system , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.