A Heterogeneous Visual Imaging Model for Analyzing Impact of Vehicle Type on Car-Following Dynamics

Heterogeneity is an essential characteristic in car-following behaviors, which can be defined as the differences between the car following behaviors of driver/vehicle combination under comparable conditions. This paper proposes a Visual Imaging Model (VIM) with relaxed assumption on a driver’s perfect perception for 3-D traffic information and uniform reaction to vehicles with different sizes in most existing car following models. The proposed model can generate greater stimuli to the followers from the leading vehicles with larger back sizes (i.e. defined as vehicle width×vehicle height) and short distance to the following vehicles, but less changes in stimuli for the distant leading vehicles under various back sizes. The US101 NGSIM data set containing vehicle type/size information is used to evaluate the proposed model at the levels of single trajectory pair and vehicle types. The calibration and validation results show the promising performance of the proposed model in describing heterogeneous car-following behavior. In this study, it is also found from US101 NGSIM data set that in relatively high velocity range, the following gap distance for car following truck (C-T) is greater than that for car following car (C-C), while in low velocity range, C-T has a smaller spacing than C-C. The phenomenon can also be reproduced by the proposed model.

[1]  M T Parker,et al.  THE EFFECT OF HEAVY GOODS VEHICLES AND FOLLOWING BEHAVIOUR ON CAPACITY AT MOTORWAY ROADWORK SITES. , 1996 .

[2]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[3]  Peter Wagner,et al.  Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models , 2004, SimVis.

[4]  W. Seelen,et al.  Intensity and edge-based symmetry detection with an application to car-following , 1993 .

[5]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  George J. Andersen,et al.  Optical Information for Car Following: The Driving by Visual Angle (DVA) Model , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Nakayama,et al.  Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[8]  Herbert Yoo,et al.  DRIVER BEHAVIOR WHILE FOLLOWING CARS, TRUCKS, AND BUSES , 1999 .

[9]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Heterogeneity In Car-Following Behavior: Theory And Empirics , 2011 .

[10]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[11]  Tom V. Mathew,et al.  Vehicle-type dependent car-following model for heterogeneous traffic conditions , 2011 .

[12]  James R. Sayer,et al.  THE EFFECT OF LEAD-VEHICLE SIZE ON DRIVER FOLLOWING BEHAVIOR , 2000 .

[13]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[14]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Driver Heterogeneity in Car following and Its Impact on Modeling Traffic Dynamics , 2007 .

[15]  E. Montroll,et al.  Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following , 1958 .

[16]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Motorway driver behaviour: studies on car following , 2002 .

[17]  Sheng Jin,et al.  Visual angle model for car-following theory , 2011 .

[18]  R. Mortimer,et al.  Drivers' estimates of time to collision. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Ben Sidaway,et al.  Time-to-Collision Estimation in a Simulated Driving Task , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  Steady-State Solutions and Multiclass Calibration of Gipps Microscopic Traffic Flow Model , 2007 .

[21]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  GENERALIZED FORCE MODEL OF TRAFFIC DYNAMICS , 1998 .

[22]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Perceptual Thresholds in Car-Following---A Comparison of Recent Measurements with Earlier Results , 1977 .