Perspectives on Emergence in Information Systems Research

In this research essay we contend that “emergence,” or the formation of complex wholes from parts, is a fundamental concept for comprehending the dynamic relationships between people, technology, and organizations during the ongoing cycles of design, appropriation, and use of information systems. Past research on emergent phenomena use the concept with varying degrees of attention to the structural and functional changes that have occurred to components in the emergent whole or to the implications of the processes by which emergence occurs. Refining our perspectives of emergence will guide researchers in clarifying how the socio-technical whole is greater than the constituent parts and how the whole comes into existence over time. In this article, we define three forms of emergence and provide both research exemplars and a framework for categorizing emergent phenomena to better articulate and refine how we understand emergent phenomena in Information Systems.

[1]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems , 1999, DATB.

[3]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[4]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[5]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  A theory of information systems based on improvisation , 1999 .

[6]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Research Agenda for Studying Open Source II: View Through the Lens of Referent Discipline Theories , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment , 2001 .

[8]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[9]  P. Anderson More is different. , 1972, Science.

[10]  M. Bunge Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge , 2003 .

[11]  Johanna Seibt,et al.  Forms of emergent interaction in General Process Theory , 2009, Synthese.

[12]  R. Garrett,et al.  Protest in an Information Society: a review of literature on social movements and new ICTs , 2006 .

[13]  Fred Niederman,et al.  A Research Agenda for Studying Open Source I: A Multi-Level Framework , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software , 2008 .

[15]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  New Perspectives on the System Usage Construct , 2005 .

[16]  J. Kallinikos Farewell to constructivism: technology and context-embedded action , 2004 .

[17]  Benyamin B. Lichtenstein,et al.  A Scale-Free Theory of Emergence: Four Sequences of Emergence Within, Of, and Across Organizations , 2008 .

[18]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Jaegwon Kim,et al.  Making Sense of Emergence , 1999 .

[21]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[22]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  A Comprehensive Review and Synthesis of Open Source Research , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Dirk S. Hovorka,et al.  Sociomateriality and IS Identity , 2011 .

[24]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[25]  David Mendonça,et al.  Collaborative adhocracies and mix-and-match technologies in emergency management , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[26]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[27]  Angela Lin,et al.  Sociotechnical Perspectives on Emergence Phenomena , 2000 .

[28]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure , 2006, CSCW '06.

[29]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[33]  Carl A. Rubino,et al.  Emergence, Complexity, and Self-Organization: PRECURSORS AND PROTOTYPES , 2008 .

[34]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Place-making: A Phenomenological Theory of Technology Appropriation , 2012, ICIS.

[35]  J. Casti,et al.  Would-Be Worlds , 1996 .

[36]  Karen Barad Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning , 2007 .

[37]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Does Fit Matter? The Impact of Task-Technology Fit and Appropriation on Team Performance in Repeated Tasks , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Peter A. Corning,et al.  The Emergence of "Emergence": Now What? , 2002 .

[39]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Growing systems in emergent organizations , 1999, CACM.

[40]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  Time Matters: On Theory and Method , 2001 .

[41]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A hermeneutic interpretation of a controlled laboratory experiment: a case study of decision‐making with a group support system , 2012, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  Helena Karsten,et al.  Constructing Interdependencies with Collaborative Information Technology , 2000 .

[43]  Hind Benbya,et al.  Toward a complexity theory of information systems development , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[44]  J. Crutchfield Is anything ever new?: considering emergence , 1999 .