Feedback in Written Instruction

When students respond to an instructional communication, telling them whether or not their answer is correct increases the amount of material remembered on a later test (Anderson, Kulhavy, & Andre, 1971; Gilman, 1969; Meyer, 1960). Unfortunately, the mechanisms responsible for such facilitation are frequently misunderstood, and one can find numerous examples in both research and instructional development where feedback is used inappropriately, neutralizing any positive effects it might have on student performance. The main purpose of this paper is to provide an integration of the work done on feedback processes, especially as these results apply to written lessons and the design of instructional materials. Finally, this discussion makes no attempt to cover the more task specific literature dealing with motor learning, simple concept acquisition, or paired-associates, since excellent reviews already exist in these areas (Adams, 1968; Ammons, 1956; Bilodeau, 1966; Bourne, 1966; Renner, 1964).

[1]  Tim L. Wentling,et al.  Mastery versus Nonmastery Instruction with Varying Test Item Feedback Treatments. , 1973 .

[2]  P. Sturges,et al.  Delay-retention effect and informative feedback. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  S. Lublin,et al.  Reinforcement schedules, scholastic aptitude, autonomy need, and achievement in a programed course. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[4]  D. Zeaman,et al.  Positive and negative knowledge of results on a Pressey-type punchboard. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Adams.  Response feedback and learning. , 1968 .

[6]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Feedback Procedures in Programmed Instruction. , 1971 .

[7]  P. Sturges,et al.  Verbal Retention as a Function of the Informativeness and Display of Informative Feedback. , 1969 .

[8]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Strong Formal Prompts in Programed Instruction , 1967 .

[9]  C. Myers.  Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[10]  John Annett,et al.  THE ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS IN LEARNING: A SURVEY , 1961 .

[11]  William H. Melching.  PI under a feedback schedule , 1966 .

[12]  Theory and Results on Feedback and Retention. , 1975 .

[13]  Joe B. Hansen,et al.  Effects of Feedback, Learner Control, and Cognitive Abilities on State Anxiety and Performance in a Computer-Assisted Instruction Task. , 1974 .

[14]  Y. Brackbill,et al.  Feedback delay and the teaching machine , 1964 .

[15]  R. Karraker.  Knowledge of results and incorrect recall of plausible multiple-choice alternatives. , 1967 .

[16]  J. Feldhusen,et al.  A Study of Nine Methods of Presentation of Programmed Learning Material , 1962 .

[17]  N. Markowitz,et al.  Feedback and the delay-retention effect. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Learning-criterion error perseveration in text material. , 1972 .

[19]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests , 1972 .

[20]  E. Fantino.  The Analysis of Behavior. , 1971 .

[21]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Role of Knowledge of Results in Programed Instruction , 1964 .

[22]  Edward F. O'Day.  Programmed Instruction: Techniques and Trends. , 1970 .

[23]  K. Renner.  DELAYED OF REINFORCEMENT: A HISTORICAL REVIEW. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Effects of Systematic Variations in Reinforcement Contingencies on Learner Performance , 1971 .

[25]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Teaching machines and programmed learning , 1960 .

[26]  James H. Block,et al.  An Exploration of Two Correction Procedures Used in Mastery Learning Approaches to Instruction. , 1974 .

[27]  Frederick J. Mcdonald.  An Investigation of Presentation, Response, and Correction Factors in Programmed Instruction , 1962 .

[28]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Knowledge of Results in Self-Teaching Spelling , 1961 .

[29]  P. Sturges,et al.  Information delay and retention: Effect of information in feedback and tests. , 1972 .

[30]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Human conceptual behavior , 1966 .

[31]  N. F. Talyzina,et al.  Psychological bases of programmed instruction , 1973 .

[32]  R. Ammons.  Effects of Knowledge of Performance: A Survey and Tentative Theoretical Formulation , 1956 .

[33]  Edward A. Bilodeau,et al.  Acquisition of Skill , 1967 .

[34]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Delay-retention effect in natural classroom settings. , 1975 .

[35]  Mary McCormick,et al.  Learning as a consequence of the learner's task involvement under different conditions of feedback. , 1964 .

[36]  A. Buss,et al.  Stimulus generalization as a function of verbal reinforcement combinations. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Richard C. Anderson.  Control of Student Mediating Processes During Verbal Learning and Instruction1 , 1970 .

[38]  A. Buss,et al.  Acquisition and extinction with different verbal reinforcement combinations. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  A. Roe.  A Comparison of Branching Methods for Programmed Learning , 1962 .

[40]  R. Weisman,et al.  The effect of intermittent confirmation in programed instruction. , 1962 .

[41]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic reinforcement contingencies on learner performance. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[42]  B. Skinner,et al.  Technology of Teaching , 1967, Nature.

[43]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Imagery Instructions and the Comprehension of Text. , 1975 .

[44]  D. Gilman.  Comparison of Several Feedback Methods for Correcting Errors by Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1969 .

[45]  Arthur J. More,et al.  Delay of feedback and the acquisition and retention of verbal materials in the classroom. , 1969 .

[46]  J. Sassenrath,et al.  Delayed information feedback, feedback cues, retention set, and delayed retention. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.

[47]  B. Underwood,et al.  Effect of temporal separation of two tasks on proactive inhibition. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  Karl U. Smith,et al.  Cybernetic Principles of Learning and Educational Design , 1966 .

[49]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  On connecting connected discourse: A comment on methodology , 1975 .

[50]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Effects of Several Schedules of Knowledge of Results on Mathematics Achievement , 1965, Psychological Reports.

[51]  Lawrence M. Stolurow,et al.  Hierarchical Preview VS Problem Oriented Review in Learning an Imaginary Science1 , 1966 .

[52]  W. Elley,et al.  The role of errors in learning with feedback. , 1966, The British journal of educational psychology.

[53]  G. Angell,et al.  The Effect of Immediate Knowledge of Quiz Results on Final Examination Scores in Freshman Chemistry , 1949 .

[54]  M. Merrill.  Correction and review on successive parts in learning a hierarchical task. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[55]  A. Buss,et al.  The effect of verbal reinforcement combinations on conceptual learning. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.