Quality of Care Management Decisions by Multidisciplinary Cancer Teams: A Systematic Review

[1]  T. Athanasiou,et al.  Reviewing methodologically disparate data: a practical guide for the patient safety research field. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[2]  C. Vincent,et al.  The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership? , 2011, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[3]  C. Vincent,et al.  Decision making in surgical oncology. , 2011, Surgical oncology.

[4]  N. Sevdalis,et al.  How do nurses make decisions? , 2011, International journal of nursing studies.

[5]  Anna R. Gagliardi,et al.  Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: An international literature review , 2010, Journal of surgical oncology.

[6]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies , 2010, Medical education.

[7]  B. Mol,et al.  Multidisciplinary Team Training in a Simulation Setting for Acute Obstetric Emergencies: A Systematic Review , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. , 2010, Surgery.

[9]  Amber E Barnato,et al.  The effect of multidisciplinary care teams on intensive care unit mortality. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Ensuring patient safety through effective leadership behaviour: A literature review , 2010 .

[11]  Eric S. Holmboe,et al.  Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. , 2009, JAMA.

[12]  R. McLeod,et al.  Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences: Identifying Opportunities to Promote Implementation , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  J. Kidger,et al.  Clinical decision‐making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  F. Sim,et al.  Neurogenic Tumors of the Pelvis: Clinicopathologic Features and Surgical Outcomes Using a Multidisciplinary Team , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[15]  R. Coleman,et al.  Tumor board: more than treatment planning—A 1-year prospective survey , 2008, Journal of Cancer Education.

[16]  Sunil Krishnan,et al.  Long-Term Survival After Multidisciplinary Management of Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[17]  C Metcalfe,et al.  An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi‐disciplinary team , 2008, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[18]  N. Penel,et al.  Factors favouring palliative treatment multidisciplinary decisions for newly diagnosed visceral and soft tissue sarcomas. , 2008, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[19]  R. Dawar,et al.  Improving care in ovarian cancer: the role of a clinico-pathological meeting. , 2008, The National medical journal of India.

[20]  Jennifer J Tieman,et al.  Multidisciplinary care planning in the primary care management of completed stroke: a systematic review , 2008, BMC family practice.

[21]  M. Sidhom,et al.  Group decisions in oncology: Doctors’ perceptions of the legal responsibilities arising from multidisciplinary meetings , 2008, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[22]  P. Ewings,et al.  Analysis of consultant decision-making in the management of prostate cancer , 2008, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[23]  G. Beretta,et al.  Multidisciplinary Team-Working Indicators of Good Practice in the Clinical Management of EGFR-Inhibitor Dermatologic Toxicities , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  T. Ruers,et al.  Computer-based decision making in medicine: A model for surgery of colorectal liver metastases. , 2007, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[25]  J A Brebner,et al.  TELEMAM: a cluster randomised trial to assess the use of telemedicine in multi-disciplinary breast cancer decision making. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[26]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan , 2007, Cancer.

[27]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Supporting multidisciplinary staff meetings for guideline-based breast cancer management: a study with OncoDoc2 , 2007, AMIA.

[28]  R. Beuscart,et al.  General practitioners assessment of a structured report on medical decision making by a regional multidisciplinary cancer committee. , 2007, Bulletin du cancer.

[29]  H. Rubin,et al.  Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[30]  K. Kennedy,et al.  Clinical judgment analysis of the parameters used by consultant urologists in the management of prostate cancer. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[31]  M. Feith,et al.  Impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer , 2007, European Surgery.

[32]  F. Kee,et al.  Offering a prognosis in lung cancer: when is a team of experts an expert team? , 2007, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[33]  J Savage,et al.  Influences on multidisciplinary team decision-making , 2007, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[34]  M. Kelly,et al.  Results of a survey of the role of multidisciplinary team coordinators for colorectal cancer in England and Wales , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[35]  T. Westin,et al.  Quality assessment of a multidisciplinary tumour meeting for patients with head and neck cancer , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[36]  Francesco Leo,et al.  Multidisciplinary Management of Lung Cancer: How to Test Its Efficacy? , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[37]  S. Paterson-Brown,et al.  The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer. , 2006, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[38]  Mark A Helvie,et al.  Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board , 2006, Cancer.

[39]  Susan Catt,et al.  Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[40]  John Cairns,et al.  Group dynamics in telemedicine-delivered and standard multidisciplinary team meetings: results from the TELEMAM randomised trial , 2006 .

[41]  J. Dixon,et al.  Surgeons' views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[42]  C Metcalfe,et al.  Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[43]  R. Epstein,et al.  Utility of a Web-Based Breast Cancer Predictive Algorithm for Adjuvant Chemotherapeutic Decision Making in a Multidisciplinary Oncology Center , 2006, Cancer investigation.

[44]  R. Prescott,et al.  Attitudes of breast cancer professionals to conventional and telemedicine-delivered multidisciplinary breast meetings , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[45]  C. McArdle,et al.  An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[46]  P. Acher,et al.  Improving outcomes in urological cancers: the impact of "multidisciplinary team meetings". , 2005, International journal of surgery.

[47]  G. Nikkhah,et al.  The Brain Tumor Board: Lessons to Be Learned from an Interdisciplinary Conference , 2004, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[48]  G Delaney,et al.  Comparison of face-to-face and videoconferenced multidisciplinary clinical meetings. , 2004, Australasian radiology.

[49]  C. Borrill,et al.  The professional role of breast cancer nurses in multi-disciplinary breast cancer care teams. , 2004, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[50]  F. Kee,et al.  Decision Making in a Multidisciplinary Cancer Team: Does Team Discussion Result in Better Quality Decisions? , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[51]  J. McMurray,et al.  Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  A. Davison,et al.  Telemedicine for multidisciplinary lung cancer meetings , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[53]  G. Garcea,et al.  A snapshot of MDT working and patient mapping in the UK colorectal cancer centres in 2002 , 2003, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[54]  J. Dawson,et al.  Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[55]  John C. Morey,et al.  Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. , 2002, Health services research.

[56]  S. Salanterä,et al.  Nurses' decision-making in collecting information for the assessment of patients' nursing problems. , 2002, Journal of clinical nursing.

[57]  E. Conant,et al.  The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management , 2001, Cancer.