Review of Standards for Surface and Dermal Sampling

This article summarizes the body of available standards for sampling of chemical and biologi- cal agents on workplace surfaces, including skin. These standards consist of voluntary consensus stand- ards such as those promulgated by ASTM International, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), as well as methods produced by U.S. Fed- eral agencies such as the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Occupa- tional Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Gaps in availabilities of standards are discussed along with activities underway to address needs in the field of occupational and environmental hygiene. In many cases, the available standards have been developed largely in response to regulatory requirements. For example, ASTM International standards, which describe requirements for wiping surfaces and methodolo- gies for determining metals and metalloids such as lead and beryllium, were produced primarily in response to regulatory requirements for sampling settled dust for these elements in the United States. Methods for collection of asbestos samples, vacuum sampling, dry wipe sampling, and bulk sampling have also been promulgated. Standardized methods for non-metal contaminants and biological agents are more limited in availability. In particular, there is a lack of standardized methodologies for dermal sampling and limited standard guidance on selection of appropriate surface sampling methods and data evaluation. Activities are currently ongoing within ASTM International and ISO to address some of the gaps, but additional activity is needed to address remaining requirements for consensus standards.

[1]  C Chavalitnitikul,et al.  A laboratory evaluation of wipe testing based on lead oxide surface contamination. , 1984, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  Michael E. Barsan,et al.  NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards , 2007 .

[3]  D H Brouwer,et al.  Hand wash and manual skin wipes. , 2000, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  B. McArthur,et al.  Dermal Measurement and Wipe Sampling Methods: A Review , 1992 .

[5]  J. Stefanik Evaluation of surface contamination - Part 1: Beta-emitters (maximum beta energy greater than 0,15 MeV) and alpha-emitters (International Standard Publication ISO 7503-1:1988) , 2001 .

[6]  Dale Zimmerman,et al.  House Dust Collection Efficiency of the High Volume Small Surface Sampler on Worn Carpets , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[7]  Kevin Ashley,et al.  Vacuum sampling techniques for industrial hygienists, with emphasis on beryllium dust sampling. , 2006, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[8]  R. Fenske Dermal exposure assessment techniques. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  S. Dufay,et al.  Comparison of collection efficiencies of sampling methods for removable beryllium surface contamination. , 2006, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[10]  Kevin Ashley,et al.  Evaluation of a Standardized Micro-Vacuum Sampling Method for Collection of Surface Dust , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  M. Boeniger A Comparison of Surface Wipe Media for Sampling Lead on Hands , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[12]  Kevin Ashley,et al.  Interlaboratory Evaluation of a Portable Fluorescence Method for the Measurement of Trace Beryllium in the Workplace , 2005 .

[13]  H Kromhout,et al.  Conceptual model for assessment of dermal exposure. , 1999, Occupational and environmental medicine.