Biophysical potential of crop residues for biochar carbon sequestration, and co‐benefits, in Uganda

Abstract Increasing organic matter/carbon contents of soils is one option proposed to offset climate change inducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, under the auspices of the UNFCC Paris Agreement. One of the complementary practices to sequester carbon in soils on decadal time scales is amending it with biochar, a carbon rich byproduct of biomass gasification. In sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA), there is a widespread and close interplay of agrarian‐based economies and the use of biomass for fuel, which makes the co‐benefits of biochar production for agriculture and energy supply explicitly different from the rest of the world. To date, the quantities of residues available from staple crops for biochar production, and their potential for carbon sequestration in farming systems of SSA have not been comprehensively investigated. We assessed the productivity and usage of biomass waste from maize, sorghum, rice, millet, and groundnut crops; specifically quantifying straw, shanks, chaff, and shells, based on measurements from multiple farmer fields and household surveys in eastern Uganda. Moreover, allometric models were tested, using grain productivity, plant height, and density as predictors. These models enable rapid and low‐cost assessment of the potential availability of feedstocks at various spatial scales: individual cropland, farm enterprise, region, and country. Ultimately, we modeled the carbon balance in soils of major cropping systems when amended with biochar from biomass residues, and up‐scaled this for basic scenario analysis. This interdisciplinary approach showcases that there is significant biophysical potential for soil carbon sequestration in farming systems of Uganda through amendment of biochar derived from unused residues of cereals and legume crops. Furthermore, information about these biomass waste flows is used for estimating the rates of biochar input that could be made to farmlands, as well as the amounts of energy that could be produced with gasifier appliances.

[1]  B. Murphy Soil Carbon Sequestration as an Elusive Climate Mitigation Tool , 2020 .

[2]  T. Kätterer,et al.  Biochar addition persistently increased soil fertility and yields in maize-soybean rotations over 10 years in sub-humid regions of Kenya , 2019, Field Crops Research.

[3]  R. Amundson,et al.  Managing for soil carbon sequestration: Let’s get realistic , 2018, Global change biology.

[4]  G. Taylor,et al.  FACE facts hold for multiple generations; Evidence from natural CO2 springs , 2018, Global change biology.

[5]  A. Watzinger,et al.  The Impact of Biochar Incorporation on Inorganic Nitrogen Fertilizer Plant Uptake; An Opportunity for Carbon Sequestration in Temperate Agriculture , 2018, Geosciences.

[6]  R. Amundson,et al.  Opinion: Soil carbon sequestration is an elusive climate mitigation tool , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  A. Jess,et al.  Of culture, consumption and cost: A comparative analysis of household energy consumption in Kenya, Germany and Spain , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[8]  A. Z. Miller,et al.  Effects of aging under field conditions on biochar structure and composition: Implications for biochar stability in soils. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  M. Huxham,et al.  Firewood usage and indoor air pollution from traditional cooking fires in Gazi Bay, Kenya , 2018 .

[10]  Pete Smith,et al.  Natural climate solutions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Adiku,et al.  Effects of biochar, waste water irrigation and fertilization on soil properties in West African urban agriculture , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  H. Blanco‐Canqui Biochar and Soil Physical Properties , 2017 .

[13]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Soil carbon 4 per mille , 2017 .

[14]  Simon Jeffery,et al.  Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields , 2017 .

[15]  L. Breuer,et al.  Current economic obstacles to biochar use in agriculture and climate change mitigation , 2016 .

[16]  S. Friedman Evaluating the Role of Water Availability in Determining the Yield–Plant Population Density Relationship , 2016 .

[17]  Pete Smith Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies , 2016, Global change biology.

[18]  Y. Kuzyakov,et al.  Biochar stability in soil: meta‐analysis of decomposition and priming effects , 2016 .

[19]  J. Burney,et al.  Cookstoves illustrate the need for a comprehensive carbon market , 2015 .

[20]  J. Graaff,et al.  Understanding the impact and adoption of conservation agriculture in Africa: A multi-scale analysis , 2014 .

[21]  G. Pan,et al.  Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions—a meta-analysis of literature data , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[22]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Modeling black carbon degradation and movement in soil , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[23]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Stability and stabilisation of biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents , 2010 .

[24]  P. Sánchez Tripling crop yields in tropical Africa , 2010 .

[25]  J. Skjemstad,et al.  Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils , 2006 .