Towards 20% efficient large‐area screen‐printed rear‐passivated silicon solar cells

We have implemented a baseline solar cell process based on today's standard industrially manufactured silicon solar cells. Using this process, we achieve conversion efficiencies up to 18.5% applying 125 × 125 mm² pseudo‐square p‐type 2–3 Ω cm boron‐doped Czochralski silicon wafers featuring screen‐printed front and rear contacts and a homogenously doped 70 Ω/□ n+‐emitter. Optimizing a print‐on‐print process for the silver front side metallization, we reduce the finger width from 110 to 70 µm, which increases the conversion efficiency up to 18.9% due to the reduced shadowing loss. In order to further increase the efficiency, we implement two different dielectric rear surface passivation stacks: (i) a silicon dioxide/silicon nitride stack and (ii) an aluminium oxide/silicon nitride stack. The rear contacts to the silicon base are formed by local laser ablation of the passivation stack and aluminium screen printing. The dielectric layer stacks at the rear decrease the surface recombination velocity from Seff,rear = 350 cm/s for a full‐area Al back surface field down to Seff,rear = 70 cm/s and increase the internal reflectance from 61% up to 91%. The improved solar cell rear increases the conversion efficiency η up to an independently confirmed value of 19.4%, the short‐circuit current density Jsc up to 38.9 mA/cm² and the open‐circuit voltage Voc up to 662 mV. The detailed solar cell analysis reveals potential to further increase the conversion efficiency towards 20% in the near future. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Brendel,et al.  Evaluation of Series Resistance Losses in Screen-Printed Solar Cells With Local Rear Contacts , 2011, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[2]  T. Boscke,et al.  Fully screen-printed PERC cells with laser-fired contacts — An industrial cell concept with 19.5% efficiency , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[3]  A. Rohatgi,et al.  Large area 19.4% efficient rear passivated silicon solar cells with local Al BSF and screen-printed contacts , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[4]  K. Bothe,et al.  19.4%‐efficient large‐area fully screen‐printed silicon solar cells , 2011 .

[5]  Marco Galiazzo,et al.  Double Printing of Front Contact Ag in c-Si Solar Cells , 2010 .

[6]  E. Erben,et al.  High Productive Solar Cell Passivation on Roth&Rau MAiA® MW-PECVD Inline Machine – A Comparison of Al2O3 , SiO2 and SiNx-H Process Conditions and Performance , 2010 .

[7]  T. Falcon High Accuracy, High Aspect Ratio Metallization on Silicon Solar Cells Using a Print on Print Process , 2010 .

[8]  K. A. Münzer,et al.  Advanced Rear Side Technology for Industrial High Efficiency Solar Cells , 2010 .

[9]  Trung Pham,et al.  Improving Electrical Performance by Double Print Method and Non-Contact Busbars , 2010 .

[10]  R. Brendel,et al.  Effective surface passivation of crystalline silicon using ultrathin Al2O3 films and Al2O3/SiNx stacks , 2009 .

[11]  Wmm Erwin Kessels,et al.  Surface passivation of high‐efficiency silicon solar cells by atomic‐layer‐deposited Al2O3 , 2008 .

[12]  Karsten Bothe,et al.  Deactivation of the boron–oxygen recombination center in silicon by illumination at elevated temperature , 2008 .

[13]  R. Alcubilla,et al.  Surface passivation of p-type crystalline Si by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited amorphous SiC x :H films , 2001 .

[14]  Mark Kerr,et al.  Surface recombination velocity of phosphorus-diffused silicon solar cell emitters passivated with plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited silicon nitride and thermal silicon oxide , 2001 .

[15]  Mark Kerr,et al.  Surface passivation of silicon solar cells using plasma-enhanced chemical-vapour-deposited SiN films and thin thermal SiO2/plasma SiN stacks , 2001 .

[16]  A. Rohatgi,et al.  Optimized aluminum back surface field techniques for silicon solar cells , 1997, Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997.

[17]  Paul A. Basore,et al.  Extended spectral analysis of internal quantum efficiency , 1993, Conference Record of the Twenty Third IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1993 (Cat. No.93CH3283-9).

[18]  M. Green,et al.  22.8% efficient silicon solar cell , 1989 .

[19]  K. Bothe,et al.  Recombination at local aluminum-alloyed silicon solar cell base contacts by dynamic infrared lifetime mapping , 2011 .

[20]  Thorsten Dullweber,et al.  Analysis of local Al-doped back surface fields for high efficiency screen-printed solar cells , 2011 .

[21]  J. John,et al.  Influence of Surface Conditioning and Passivation Schemes on the Internal Rear Reflectance of Bulk Silicon Solar Cells , 2010 .

[22]  G. Hahn,et al.  Avoiding boron-oxygen related degradation in highly boron doped Cz silicon , 2006 .

[23]  S. Peters Rapid Thermal Processing of Crystalline Silicon Materials and Solar Cells , 2004 .

[24]  Bernhard Fischer,et al.  Loss analysis of crystalline silicon solar cells using photoconductance and quantum efficiency measurements , 2003 .

[25]  Kenji Yamamoto,et al.  Thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells , 2002 .