Can reliable values of Young’s modulus be deduced from Fisher’s (1971) spinning lens measurements?

The current textbook view of the causes of presbyopia rests very largely on a series of experiments reported by R.F. Fisher some three decades ago, and in particular on the values of lens Young's modulus inferred from the deformation caused by spinning excised lenses about their optical axis (Fisher 1971) We studied the extent to which inferred values of Young's modulus are influenced by assumptions inherent in the mathematical procedures used by Fisher to interpret the test and we investigated several alternative interpretation methods. The results suggest that modelling assumptions inherent in Fisher's original method may have led to systematic errors in the determination of the Young's modulus of the cortex and nucleus. Fisher's conclusion that the cortex is stiffer than the nucleus, particularly in middle age, may be an artefact associated with these systematic errors. Moreover, none of the models we explored are able to account for Fisher's claim that the removal of the capsule has only a modest effect on the deformations induced in the spinning lens.

[1]  R F Fisher,et al.  The postnatal growth of the capsule of the human crystalline lens. , 1972, Journal of anatomy.

[2]  R. Fisher.  Elastic constants of the human lens capsule , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  R. Fisher.  The elastic constants of the human lens , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[5]  C. Danielsen,et al.  Tensile mechanical and creep properties of Descemet's membrane and lens capsule. , 2004, Experimental eye research.

[6]  C Hartung,et al.  Mechanical testing of isolated senile human eye lens nuclei. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  F. Verhoeff.  Cataract and Anomalies of the Lens. , 1944 .

[8]  H. J. Burd,et al.  Numerical modelling of the accommodating lens , 2002, Vision Research.

[9]  H. Pau,et al.  The increasing sclerosis of the human lens with age and its relevance to accommodation and presbyopia , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[10]  Henk A Weeber,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of human lenses. , 2005, Experimental eye research.

[11]  M. Campbell,et al.  Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia , 1999, Vision Research.

[12]  W REEVES,et al.  Cataract and anomalies of the lens. , 1948, The Optician.

[13]  Charles E. Augarde,et al.  Modelling tunnelling-induced settlement of masonry buildings , 2000 .

[14]  R. Truscott,et al.  Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia? , 2004, Molecular vision.

[15]  W. P. Graebel,et al.  Elasticity of tissues involved in accommodation , 1991, Vision Research.

[16]  T. Andreassen,et al.  Mechanical properties of the human lens capsule , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.