Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.

A series of psychophysical lifting studies was conducted to establish maximum acceptable weights of lift (MAWL) for three supply items commonly handled in underground coal mines (rock dust bags, ventilation stopping blocks, and crib blocks). Each study utilized 12 subjects, all of whom had considerable experience working in underground coal mines. Effects of lifting in four postures (standing, stooping under a 1.5 m ceiling, stooping under a 1.2 m ceiling, and kneeling) were investigated together with four lifting conditions (combinations of lifting symmetry and lifting height). The frequency of lifting was set at four per min, and the task duration was 15 min. Posture significantly affected the MAWL for the rock dust bag (standing MAWL was 7% greater than restricted postures and kneeling MAWL was 6.4% less than stopped); however, posture interacted with lifting conditions for both of the other materials. Physiological costs were found to be significantly greater in the stooped postures compared with kneeling for all materials. Other contrasts (standing versus restricted postures, stooping under 1.5 m ceiling versus stopping under 1.2 m ceiling) did not exhibit significantly different levels of energy expenditure. Energy expenditure was significantly affected by vertical lifting height; however, the plane of lifting had little influence on metabolic cost. Recommended acceptable workloads for the three materials are 20.0 kg for the rock dust bag, 16.5 kg for the ventilation stopping block, and 14.7 kg for the crib block. These results suggest that miners are often required to lift supplies that are substantially heavier than psychophysically acceptable lifting limits.

[1]  J E Ridd Spatial restraints and intra-abdominal pressure. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[2]  A Mital,et al.  Psychophysical and physiological responses to lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[3]  J L Smith,et al.  A manual materials handling study of bag lifting. , 1984, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[4]  A Mital,et al.  Effect of task variables and their interactions in lifting and lowering loads. , 1981, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  Sean Gallagher,et al.  Lifting In Stooped And Kneeling Postures: Effects On Lifting Capacity, Metabolic Costs, And Electromyography Of Eight Trunk Muscles , 1988 .

[6]  S Gallagher,et al.  Lifting in four restricted lifting conditions: psychophysical, physiological and biomechanical effects of lifting in stooped and kneeling postures. , 1990, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Arun Garg,et al.  Container Characteristics and Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift1 , 1980 .

[8]  S Kumar,et al.  The physiological cost of three different methods of lifting in sagittal and lateral planes. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[9]  S Gallagher,et al.  Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[10]  R A Graveling,et al.  Manual handling of supplies in free and restricted headroom. , 1988, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  J D Troup,et al.  Effects on the trunk of erecting pit props at different working heights. , 1966, Ergonomics.

[12]  Anil Mital,et al.  Kinetic analysis of manual lifting activities: Part II—Biomechanical analysis of task variables , 1986 .

[13]  M. Jacob A personal communication , 1989 .

[14]  J. S. Lawrence,et al.  RHEUMATISM IN COAL MINERS: PART III: OCCUPATIONAL FACTORS , 1955 .

[15]  S. Snook,et al.  Maximum acceptable weight of lift. , 1967, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[16]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[17]  Anil Mital,et al.  Influence of container shape, partitions, frequency, distance, and height level on the maximum acceptable amount of liquid carried by males , 1982 .

[18]  C G Drury Handles for manual materials handling. , 1980, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  S Kumar,et al.  Physiological responses to weight lifting in different planes. , 1980, Ergonomics.

[20]  S H Snook,et al.  Psychophysical considerations in permissible loads. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[21]  A. Garg,et al.  Maximum acceptable weights and maximum voluntary isometric strengths for asymmetric lifting. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[22]  R. Jensen,et al.  Assessment of workers' compensation claims for back strains/sprains. , 1984, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.