Quantifying uncertainty in geoacoustic inversion. II. Application to broadband, shallow-water data.

This paper applies the new method of fast Gibbs sampling (FGS) to estimate the uncertainties of seabed geoacoustic parameters in a broadband, shallow-water acoustic survey, with the goal of interpreting the survey results and validating the method for experimental data. FGS applies a Bayesian approach to geoacoustic inversion based on sampling the posterior probability density to estimate marginal probability distributions and parameter covariances. This requires knowledge of the statistical distribution of the data errors, including both measurement and theory errors, which is generally not available. Invoking the simplifying assumption of independent, identically distributed Gaussian errors allows a maximum-likelihood estimate of the data variance and leads to a practical inversion algorithm. However, it is necessary to validate these assumptions, i.e., to verify that the parameter uncertainties obtained represent meaningful estimates. To this end, FGS is applied to a geoacoustic experiment carried out at a site off the west coast of Italy where previous acoustic and geophysical studies have been performed. The parameter uncertainties estimated via FGS are validated by comparison with: (i) the variability in the results of inverting multiple independent data sets collected during the experiment; (ii) the results of FGS inversion of synthetic test cases designed to simulate the experiment and data errors; and (iii) the available geophysical ground truth. Comparisons are carried out for a number of different source bandwidths, ranges, and levels of prior information, and indicate that FGS provides reliable and stable uncertainty estimates for the geoacoustic inverse problem.

[1]  Evan K. Westwood,et al.  A higher-order energy-conserving parabolic equqation for range-dependent ocean depth, sound speed, and density , 1991 .

[2]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Bayesian inference, Gibbs' sampler and uncertainty estimation in geophysical inversion , 1996 .

[3]  Peter Gerstoft,et al.  Inversion of broad-band multitone acoustic data from the YELLOW SHARK summer experiments , 1996 .

[4]  Tracianne B. Neilsen,et al.  Mode function extraction from a VLA using singular value decomposition , 1997 .

[5]  P. Gerstoft,et al.  Ocean acoustic inversion with estimation of a posteriori probability distributions , 1998 .

[6]  N. R. Chapman,et al.  Workshop '97: Benchmarking for Geoacoustic Inversion in Shallow Water , 1998 .

[7]  Stan E. Dosso,et al.  GEOACOUSTIC INVERSION VIA LOCAL, GLOBAL, AND HYBRID ALGORITHMS , 1999 .

[8]  Jean-Pierre Hermand,et al.  Broad-band geoacoustic inversion in shallow water from waveguide impulse response measurements on a single hydrophone: theory and experimental results , 1999 .

[9]  Martin Siderius,et al.  Yellow Shark Spring 1995: Inversion results from sparse broadband acoustic measurements over a highly range-dependent soft clay layer , 1999 .

[10]  Fallat,et al.  Hybrid geoacoustic inversion of broadband Mediterranean Sea data , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Stan E. Dosso,et al.  An adaptive-hybrid algorithm for geoacoustic inversion , 2001 .

[12]  S. Dosso.  Quantifying uncertainty in geoacoustic inversion. I. A fast Gibbs sampler approach. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.