Linking dynamic-range compression across the ears can improve speech intelligibility in spatially separated noise.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. V. Schaik,et al. Benefit from spatial separation of multiple talkers in bilateral hearing-aid users: Effects of hearing loss, age, and cognition , 2009, International journal of audiology.
[2] Graham Naylor,et al. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 2. Patterns of candidature , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[3] Amro El-Jaroudi,et al. Relative energy and intelligibility of transient speech information , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..
[4] C W Turner,et al. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[5] A. Kam,et al. Comparison of performance with wide dynamic range compression and linear amplification. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[6] N. J. Versfeld,et al. The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] J. Culling,et al. The role of head-related time and level cues in the unmasking of speech in noise and competing speech , 2005 .
[8] B. Moore,et al. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Pamela E Souza,et al. Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality , 2002, Trends in amplification.
[10] Ian M Wiggins,et al. Effects of Dynamic-Range Compression on the Spatial Attributes of Sounds in Normal-Hearing Listeners , 2012, Ear and hearing.
[11] H. Dillon,et al. An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .
[12] Björn Hagerman,et al. The effect of presentation level and compression characteristics on sentence recognition in modulated noise , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[13] Björn Hagerman,et al. The effect of audibility, signal-to-noise ratio, and temporal speech cues on the benefit from fast-acting compression in modulated noise , 2005, International journal of audiology.
[14] W. Noble,et al. Optimizing Sound Localization with Hearing Aids , 1998, Trends in amplification.
[15] J M Festen,et al. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Brian M. Kreisman,et al. Improvements in Speech Understanding With Wireless Binaural Broadband Digital Hearing Instruments in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2010, Trends in amplification.
[17] Lise Bruun Hansen. Epoq study measures user benefits , 2008 .
[18] James M Kates,et al. Understanding compression: Modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[19] B C Moore,et al. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. , 1999, British journal of audiology.
[20] Gerald Kidd,et al. Evaluating the Benefit of Hearing Aids in Solving the Cocktail Party Problem , 2008, Trends in amplification.
[21] Brian C J Moore,et al. The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences , 2008, Trends in amplification.
[22] Graham Naylor,et al. Long-term signal-to-noise ratio at the input and output of amplitude-compression systems. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[23] R L Freyman,et al. The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] R Plomp,et al. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Paula C. Stacey,et al. Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] James M Kates,et al. Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] V Pluvinage,et al. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[28] B. Moore,et al. Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] B. Seeber,et al. Dynamic-range compression affects the lateral position of sounds. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Marcus Holmberg,et al. Binaural hearing aid communication shown to improve sound quality and localization , 2009 .
[31] Steven Greenberg,et al. A Multi-Tier Framework for Understanding Spoken Language , 2012 .
[32] Martin Dahlquist,et al. Standard Audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 Measurement Procedure , 2010, Trends in amplification.
[33] Jens Blauert,et al. The AUDIS catalog of human HRTFs , 1998 .
[34] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Measuring the acoustic effects of compression amplification on speech in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] Charles E. Robinson,et al. The Intelligibility of Speech Processed by Delayed Long‐Time‐Averaged Compression Amplification , 1973 .
[36] Brian C J Moore,et al. Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[37] H Dillon. Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[38] Gitte Keidser,et al. The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[39] J. C. Middlebrooks,et al. Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] D. M. Green,et al. Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.
[41] James M. Kates,et al. Digital hearing aids. , 2008, Harvard health letter.
[42] M. Walger,et al. Influence of Dynamic Compression on Directional Hearing in the Horizontal Plane , 2006, Ear and hearing.