Empowering patients through eHealth: a case report of a pan-European project

BackgroundThis paper crystallises the experience developed by the pan-European PALANTE Consortium in dealing with the generation of relevant evidence from heterogeneous eHealth services for patient empowerment in nine European Regions. The European Commission (EC) recently funded a number of pan-European eHealth projects aimed at empowering European patients/citizens thus transforming the traditional patient/citizen role in the management of their health (e.g., PALANTE, SUSTAIN, CARRE, HeartCycle, Empower). However, the heterogeneity of the healthcare systems, of the implemented services and of the target patients, the use of ad-hoc definitions of the salient concepts and the development of small-size experiences have prevented the dissemination of “global” results and the development of cumulative knowledge. The main challenge has been the generation of large-scale evidence from heterogeneous small-size experiences.DiscussionThree lessons have been collectively learnt during the development of the PALANTE project, which involves 9 sites that have implemented different eHealth services for empowering different typologies of patients. These lessons have been refined progressively through project meetings, reviews with the EC Project Officer and Reviewers. The paper illustrates the ten steps followed to develop the three lessons.The first lesson learnt is about how EC-funded projects should develop cumulative knowledge by avoiding self-crafted measures of outcome and by adopting literature-grounded definitions and scales. The second lesson learnt is about how EC-funded projects should identify ambitious, cross-pilot policy and research questions that allow pooling of data from across heterogeneous experiences even if a multi-centre study design was not agreed before. The third lesson learnt is about how EC-funded projects should open their collections of data and make them freely-accessible to the scientific community shortly after the conclusion of the project in order to guarantee the replicability of results and conclusions.SummaryThe three lessons might provide original elements for fuelling the ongoing debate about the capability of the EC to develop evidence-based policies by pooling evidence from heterogeneous, local experiences.

[1]  J. Hibbard,et al.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. , 2004, Health services research.

[2]  G. Paré,et al.  Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. , 2008, Health policy.

[3]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge translation of research findings , 2012, Implementation Science.

[4]  Kalyani Ankem,et al.  Factors influencing information needs among cancer patients: A meta-analysis , 2006 .

[5]  D. Brooks,et al.  Home telemonitoring effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review , 2014, International journal of clinical practice.

[6]  M. Lluch.  Empowering Patients Through ICT, Organisational Impact on Healthcare Systems in England and Scotland , 2011 .

[7]  Anne Wilson,et al.  Knowledge translation within a population health study: how do you do it? , 2013, Implementation Science.

[8]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Does Information Technology Training Really Matter? A Social Information Processing Analysis of Coworkers' Influence on IT Usage in the Workplace , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Ewan Ferlie,et al.  Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: a critical review of health sector and generic management literature. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[10]  A. Charalambous,et al.  Undergraduate nursing students caring for cancer patients: hermeneutic phenomenological insights of their experiences , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[11]  Jorgo Chatzimarkakis.  Why Patients Should Be More Empowered: A European Perspective on Lessons Learned in the Management of Diabetes , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[12]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[13]  Catherine L. Anderson,et al.  If We Offer it, Will They Accept? Factors Affecting Patient Use Intentions of Personal Health Records and Secure Messaging , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  O. Razum,et al.  Evidence-based Public Health , 2008, Medizinische Klinik.

[15]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  C. Dedding,et al.  How will e-health affect patient participation in the clinic? A review of e-health studies and the current evidence for changes in the relationship between medical professionals and patients. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[17]  Catherine L Backman,et al.  Exploring eHealth Ethics and Multi-Morbidity: Protocol for an Interview and Focus Group Study of Patient and Health Care Provider Views and Experiences of Using Digital Media for Health Purposes , 2013, JMIR research protocols.

[18]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions , 2010, BMC health services research.

[19]  T. Lorenc,et al.  A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[20]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[21]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[22]  A. Liberati,et al.  Patient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interests , 2012, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[23]  S. Kirn,et al.  Critical issues for the development of sustainable e-health solutions. , 2012 .

[24]  G. Dunn,et al.  Patient empowerment: The need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[25]  J. Protheroe,et al.  Patient empowerment in long-term conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measure , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[26]  L. Bos,et al.  Patient Empowerment: A Two Way Road , 2012 .

[27]  W. J. Meijer,et al.  Empowering the patient with ICT-tools: the unfulfilled promise. , 2007, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[28]  David Gefen,et al.  Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers , 2002, Data Base.

[29]  Eveline Hage,et al.  Implementation factors and their effect on e-Health service adoption in rural communities: a systematic literature review , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[30]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[31]  Cristina Masella,et al.  Patient Empowerment and its neighbours: clarifying the boundaries and their mutual relationships. , 2015, Health policy.

[32]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Barriers and opportunities of empowerment as applied in diabetes settings: a focus on health care professionals' experiences. , 2012, Diabetes research and clinical practice.