On the SAR and field inhomogeneity of birdcage coils loaded with the human head

Birdcage coils are widely used as a radiofrequency (RF) resonator in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of their capability to Produce a highly homogeneous B1 field Over a large volume within the coil. When they are employed for high‐frequency MRI, the interaction between the electromagnetic field and the object to be imaged deteriorates the B1‐field homogeneity and increases the specific absorption rate (SAR) in the object. To investigate this problem, a finite‐element method (FEM) is developed to analyze the SAR and the B1 field in a two‐dimensional (2D) model of a birdcage coil loaded with a 2D model of a human head. The electric field, magnetic field, and SAR distributions are shown, and a comprehensive study is carried out for both linear and quadrature birdcage coils at 64, 128, 171, and 256 MHz. It is that to generate the same value of the B1 field, the SAR is increased significantly with the frequency, and for the same imaging method the SAR produced by a quadrature coil is significantly lower than that of a linear coil. It is also shown that the B1‐field inhomogeneity is increased significantly with the frequency.

[1]  J W Carlson,et al.  Electromagnetic fields of surface coil in vivo NMR at high frequencies , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Stuchly,et al.  DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF BIOLOGICAL SUBSTANCES–TABULATED , 1980 .

[3]  Jian-Ming Jin,et al.  The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics , 1993 .

[4]  Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al.  A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .

[5]  T K Foo,et al.  An analytical model for the design of RF resonators for MR body imaging , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Spatial distribution of high-frequency electromagnetic energy in human head during MRI: numerical results and measurements , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Schenck,et al.  Estimating radiofrequency power deposition in body NMR imaging , 1985, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  P M Joseph,et al.  A technique for double resonant operation of birdcage imaging coils. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[9]  On the field inhomogeneity of a birdcage coil , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J. Tropp.  The theory of the bird-cage resonator , 1989 .

[11]  W. Barber,et al.  Comparison of linear and circular polarization for magnetic resonance imaging , 1985 .

[12]  R.L. Magin,et al.  A simple method to incorporate the effects of an RF shield into RF resonator analysis for MRI applications , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  W. Chew,et al.  Computation of electromagnetic fields for high-frequency magnetic resonance imaging applications. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  P A Bottomley,et al.  RF magnetic field penetration, phase shift and power dissipation in biological tissue: implications for NMR imaging. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  SAR calculations in an anatomically realistic model of the head for mobile communication transceivers at 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  J. Schenck,et al.  An efficient, highly homogeneous radiofrequency coil for whole-body NMR imaging at 1.5 T , 1985 .