Engaging customers through online participation in social networking sites

Social networking is currently the most popular online activity among consumers worldwide. Today in business context, Social media is achieving increasing importance as a channel for consumer's online participation and engagement. Brands are developing its presence in social networking sites to meet engagement, brand awareness and word of mouth. In this context, the analysis of the factors that are conditioning consumer interaction with branded content becomes a matter of interest. To explore factors influencing consumer's online engagement in social networking sites (SNS), this study applies use and gratification (U&G) theory to explain why people are actively involved in media usage and interact highly with the communication media i.e., SNS. This study used an online as well as offline questionnaire to conduct empirical research, and collected and analyzed data of 394 samples by structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. The findings show that the U&G theory significantly explains consumers' attitude toward social networking ad (SNA). The result shows that the content characteristics of SNA i.e., vividness, interactivity, entertainment and information have direct influence on the consumers' online participation and engagement behavior whereas incentive doesn’t show any impact. On the other hand, when mediated by consumer's positive attitude toward SNA, vividness, interactivity, information and entertainment show partial mediation effect on the consumers' online participation and engagement behavior whereas incentive show full mediation effect. In addition, this study found that the social media users who have a positive attitude toward SNA are more likely to surf the Net and feel more engaged. This study empirically contributes to the existing literature on the management of marketing strategies for consumer engagement in social networking sites.

[1]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co‐creating unique value with customers , 2004 .

[2]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[3]  Russell I. Haley,et al.  The ARF Copy Research Validity Project , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[4]  Roger E. Millsap,et al.  Doing the Four-Step Right , 2000 .

[5]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[6]  Erkan Akar,et al.  An Examination of the Factors Influencing Consumers' Attitudes Toward Social Media Marketing , 2011 .

[7]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Internet Social Networking , 2011 .

[8]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[9]  Benedikt Jahn,et al.  How to Transform Consumers into Fans of Your Brand , 2012 .

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Sarah J. S. Wilner,et al.  Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities , 2009 .

[12]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[13]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[14]  Keith S. Coulter.  The Effects of Affective Responses to Media Context on Advertising Evaluations , 1998 .

[15]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  Alex Wang.  Advertising Engagement: A Driver of Message Involvement on Message Effects , 2006, Journal of Advertising Research.

[17]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The Impact Of Content And Design Elements On Banner Advertising Click-Through Rates , 2003 .

[18]  E. Malthouse,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness , 2009 .

[19]  M. Sawhney,et al.  Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation , 2005 .

[20]  P. Nambisan,et al.  How to Profit From a Better ¿Virtual Customer Environment¿ , 2008 .

[21]  Adrian Palmer,et al.  An experiential, social network‐based approach to direct marketing , 2009 .

[22]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Rohan Miller,et al.  Social Media and its implications for Viral Marketing , 2010 .

[24]  Keith S. Coulter,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS, AVAILABILITY, AND ARGUMENT QUALITY ON BRAND ATTITUDES : A Melding of Elaboration Likelihood and Cognitive Resource Matching Theories , 2004 .

[25]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward the Site , 1999 .

[26]  Chang-Hoan Cho.  How Advertising Works on the WWW: Modified Elaboration Likelihood Model , 1999 .

[27]  Guendalina Graffigna,et al.  The Concept of Engagement: A Systematic Analysis of the Ongoing Marketing Debate , 2010 .

[28]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Building consumer trust online , 1999, CACM.

[29]  Xueming Luo.  Uses and Gratifications Theory and E-Consumer Behaviors , 2002 .

[30]  Peter Neijens,et al.  Audience Experiences of Media Context and Embedded Advertising: A Comparison of Eight Media , 2006 .

[31]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[32]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model , 2006, MIS Q..

[33]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[34]  H. Wilson,et al.  Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives , 2010 .

[35]  Charles Young,et al.  The Advertising Magnifier Effect: An MTV Study , 2006, Journal of Advertising Research.

[36]  X. Drèze,et al.  Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? , 2003 .

[37]  F. Völckner,et al.  Managing Brands in the Social Media Environment , 2013 .

[38]  D. Muntinga,et al.  Introducing COBRAs , 2011 .

[39]  David A. Aaker,et al.  Measuring audience perceptions of commercials and relating them to ad impact. , 1990 .

[40]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Persuasive messages, popularity cohesion, and message diffusion in social media marketing , 2015 .

[41]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[42]  D. Fortin,et al.  Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement , 2005 .

[43]  Florian Michahelles,et al.  Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages , 2013, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[44]  P. Leeflang,et al.  Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing , 2012 .

[45]  Bobby J. Calder,et al.  Managing Media and Advertising Change with Integrated Marketing , 2005, Journal of Advertising Research.

[46]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[47]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[48]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Trying to Consume , 1990 .

[49]  Kendall Goodrich.  Anarchy of effects? Exploring attention to online advertising and multiple outcomes , 2011 .

[50]  Ebru Enginkaya,et al.  What Drives Consumers to Interact with Brands through Social Media? A Motivation Scale Development Study , 2014 .

[51]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Brand Experience: What is It? How is it Measured? Does it Affect Loyalty? , 2009 .

[52]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  John Eighmey,et al.  Adding Value in the Information Age: Uses and Gratifications of Sites on the World Wide Web , 1998 .

[54]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[55]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[56]  K. Plangger,et al.  The new WTP: Willingness to participate , 2011 .

[57]  David J. Faulds,et al.  Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix , 2009 .

[58]  L. Hollebeek.  Exploring customer brand engagement: definition and themes , 2011 .

[59]  Daniel R. Fesenmaier,et al.  Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community , 1998, Electron. Mark..

[60]  David T. Wilson,et al.  The Future of Competition , 2001 .

[61]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  Conclusions from the ARF's copy research validity project , 1994 .

[62]  A. Rubin.  Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. , 1994 .

[63]  Weng Marc Lim,et al.  E-shopping: An Analysis of the Uses and Gratifications Theory , 2012 .

[64]  R. Brodie,et al.  Customer Engagement , 2011 .

[65]  David G. Taylor,et al.  Friends, Fans, and Followers: Do Ads Work on Social Networks? , 2011, Journal of Advertising Research.

[66]  M García-Murillo,et al.  Customer knowledge management , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[67]  J. Berbegal‐Mirabent,et al.  Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages , 2014 .

[68]  M. Hatch,et al.  Toward a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance , 2010 .

[69]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age , 2013 .

[70]  Sung S. Kim,et al.  Out of Dedication or Constraint? A Dual Model of Post-Adoption Phenomena and its Empirical Test in the Context of Online Services , 2009, MIS Q..

[71]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[72]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development , 2010 .