Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese

In this article, we present normative data for 2,423 Chinese single-character words. For each word, we report values for the following 15 variables: word frequency, cumulative frequency, homophone density, phonological frequency, age of learning, age of acquisition, number of word formations, number of meanings, number of components, number of strokes, familiarity, concreteness, imageability, regularity, and initial phoneme. To validate the norms, we collected word-naming latencies. Factor analysis and multiple regression analysis show that naming latencies of Chinese single-character words are predicted by frequency, semantics, visual features, and consistency, but not by phonology. These analyses show distinct patterns in word naming between Chinese and alphabetic languages and demonstrate the utility of normative data in the study of nonalphabetic orthographic processing.

[1]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence , 2006 .

[2]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[4]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  G. Stone,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[6]  Ping Li,et al.  Lexical ambiguity resolution in Chinese sentence processing , 2006 .

[7]  Michael C. W. Yip,et al.  Context effects and the processing of spoken homophones , 1998 .

[8]  M J Chen,et al.  Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[9]  R. Frost.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .

[10]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Properties of school Chinese: implications for learning to read. , 2003, Child development.

[11]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Word reading and picture naming in Italian , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Ping Li,et al.  Early lexical development in a self-organizing neural network , 2004, Neural Networks.

[13]  Rumjahn Hoosain,et al.  Psychological Reality of the Word in Chinese , 1992 .

[14]  Erminio Capitani,et al.  Objective versus estimated age of word acquisition: A study of 202 Italian children , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[15]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Jian Wang,et al.  Is There Phonologically Mediated Access to Lexical Semantics in Reading Chinese , 1999 .

[17]  Ping Li,et al.  Neural representations of nouns and verbs in Chinese: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Semantic Effects in Word Naming: Evidence from English and Japanese Kanji , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency. , 2002 .

[20]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[21]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[23]  Miguel A. Perez,et al.  Objective-AoA norms for 175 names in Spanish: relationships with other psycholinguistic variables, estimated AoA, and data from other languages , 2005 .

[24]  Ping Li,et al.  Age of acquisition: its neural and computational mechanisms. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[26]  D. Balota,et al.  Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[27]  Ping Li,et al.  The Acquisition of Chinese Characters : Corpus Analyses and Connectionist Simulations , 2006 .

[28]  Ovid J. L. Tzeng,et al.  Naming of Chinese phonograms: from cognitive science to cognitive neuroscience , 2006 .

[29]  Chen Baoguo.  THE INFLUENCE OF CONCRETENESS OF WORDS ON WORD RECOGNITION , 1998 .

[30]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies , 2003 .

[31]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Phonology Matters: The Phonological Frequency Effect in Written Chinese , 2000, Psychological science.

[33]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  Youngjin Kim,et al.  The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: List of figures , 2006 .

[35]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[36]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .

[37]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.