Experimental Non-Violation of the Bell Inequality

A finite non-classical framework for qubit physics is described that challenges the conclusion that the Bell Inequality has been shown to have been violated experimentally, even approximately. This framework postulates the primacy of a fractal-like ‘invariant set’ geometry IU in cosmological state space, on which the universe evolves deterministically and causally, and from which space-time and the laws of physics in space-time are emergent. Consistent with the assumed primacy of IU, a non-Euclidean (and hence non-classical) metric gp is defined in cosmological state space. Here, p is a large but finite integer (whose inverse may reflect the weakness of gravity). Points that do not lie on IU are necessarily gp-distant from points that do. gp is related to the p-adic metric of number theory. Using number-theoretic properties of spherical triangles, the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality, whose violation would rule out local realism, is shown to be undefined in this framework. Moreover, the CHSH-like inequalities violated experimentally are shown to be gp-distant from the CHSH inequality. This result fails in the singular limit p=∞, at which gp is Euclidean and the corresponding model classical. Although Invariant Set Theory is deterministic and locally causal, it is not conspiratorial and does not compromise experimenter free will. The relationship between Invariant Set Theory, Bohmian Theory, The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Theory and p-adic Quantum Theory is discussed.

[1]  E. Knill,et al.  A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[2]  Lenore Blum,et al.  Complexity and Real Computation , 1997, Springer New York.

[3]  Andrew Khrennikov,et al.  p-adic probability interpretation of Bell's inequality , 1995 .

[4]  J. S. BELLt Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2018 .

[5]  T.N.Palmer A Gravitational Theory of the Quantum , 2017, 1709.00329.

[6]  Gerard 't Hooft,et al.  The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1405.1548.

[7]  S. V. Kozyrev,et al.  p-Adic mathematical physics: the first 30 years , 2017, 1705.04758.

[8]  B. Blank,et al.  The Road to Reality : A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe , 2006 .

[9]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[10]  David Shortt,et al.  Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology and Complexity. . , 2006 .

[11]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  The Invariant Set Postulate: a new geometric framework for the foundations of quantum theory and the role played by gravity , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Diósi,et al.  Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[13]  T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  Is the Contextuality Loophole Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities? , 2011 .

[14]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[15]  B. Hiley The Undivided Universe , 1993 .

[16]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  A New Kind of Science , 2003, Artificial Life.

[17]  Eric G. Cavalcanti,et al.  Classical Causal Models for Bell and Kochen-Specker Inequality Violations Require Fine-Tuning , 2017, 1705.05961.

[18]  C. J. Wood,et al.  The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning , 2012, 1208.4119.

[19]  Simant Dube Undecidable Problems in Fractal Geometry , 1993, Complex Syst..

[20]  H. Wiseman,et al.  The two Bellʼs theorems of John Bell , 2014, 1402.0351.

[21]  D. Meyer Finite Precision Measurement Nullifies the Kochen-Specker Theorem , 1999, quant-ph/9905080.

[22]  J. J. Sakurai,et al.  Modern Quantum Mechanics , 1986 .

[23]  John H. Selby,et al.  Entanglement is Necessary for Emergent Classicality in All Physical Theories. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[24]  J. Bell On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[25]  Lorenz, G\"{o}del and Penrose: New perspectives on determinism and causality in fundamental physics , 2013, 1309.2396.

[26]  Svetlana Katok,et al.  P-adic Analysis Compared With Real , 2007 .

[27]  T. Palmer,et al.  Lorenz, Gödel and Penrose: new perspectives on determinism and causality in fundamental physics , 2014 .

[28]  J. Barrow,et al.  Why is nature described by quantum theory , 2004 .