Fan-out in gene regulatory networks

BackgroundIn synthetic biology, gene regulatory circuits are often constructed by combining smaller circuit components. Connections between components are achieved by transcription factors acting on promoters. If the individual components behave as true modules and certain module interface conditions are satisfied, the function of the composite circuits can in principle be predicted.ResultsIn this paper, we investigate one of the interface conditions: fan-out. We quantify the fan-out, a concept widely used in electrical engineering, to indicate the maximum number of the downstream inputs that an upstream output transcription factor can regulate. The fan-out is shown to be closely related to retroactivity studied by Del Vecchio, et al. An efficient operational method for measuring the fan-out is proposed and shown to be applied to various types of module interfaces. The fan-out is also shown to be enhanced by self-inhibitory regulation on the output. The potential role of an inhibitory regulation is discussed.ConclusionsThe proposed estimation method for fan-out not only provides an experimentally efficient way for quantifying the level of modularity in gene regulatory circuits but also helps characterize and design module interfaces, enabling the modular construction of gene circuits.

[1]  Donald E. Lancaster,et al.  TTL Cookbook , 1969 .

[2]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[3]  James W. Nilsson,et al.  Electric Circuits , 1983 .

[4]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[5]  Lawrence S. Kroll.  Mathematica--A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer. , 1989 .

[6]  D. Fell.  Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[7]  A. Hayes.  Mathematica: A system for doing mathematics by computer , 1993, The Mathematical Gazette.

[8]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[9]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[10]  Herbert M. Sauro,et al.  33 JARNAC: a system for interactive metabolic analysis , 2000 .

[11]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Engineered gene circuits , 2002, Nature.

[13]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.

[14]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[15]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Alexander B. Neiman,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics of Chaotic and Stochastic Systems: Tutorial and Modern Developments , 2003 .

[17]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Next generation simulation tools: the Systems Biology Workbench and BioSPICE integration. , 2003, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[18]  M. L. Simpson,et al.  Frequency domain analysis of noise in autoregulated gene circuits , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  John E. Ayers,et al.  Digital Integrated Circuits: Analysis and Design , 2003 .

[20]  C. Rao,et al.  Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: Application to the Gillespie algorithm , 2003 .

[21]  M. L. Simpson,et al.  Frequency domain chemical Langevin analysis of stochasticity in gene transcriptional regulation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  H. Sauro,et al.  Quantitative analysis of signaling networks. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[23]  J. Stelling,et al.  Robustness of Cellular Functions , 2004, Cell.

[24]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[25]  D. Endy.  Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[26]  P. Swain,et al.  Gene Regulation at the Single-Cell Level , 2005, Science.

[27]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Reconstruction of genetic circuits , 2005, Nature.

[28]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  Dissecting the puzzle of life: modularization of signal transduction networks , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[30]  Herbert M. Sauro,et al.  SBW - A Modular Framework for Systems Biology , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference.

[31]  Frank T. Bergmann,et al.  Computational Tools for Modeling Protein Networks , 2006 .

[32]  M. L. Simpson,et al.  Gene network shaping of inherent noise spectra , 2006, Nature.

[33]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Genetic parts to program bacteria. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[34]  Jacky L. Snoep,et al.  BioModels Database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  J. Elf,et al.  Probing Transcription Factor Dynamics at the Single-Molecule Level in a Living Cell , 2007, Science.

[36]  U. Alon.  Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  Herbert M. Sauro,et al.  Design and implementation of three incoherent feed-forward motif based biological concentration sensors , 2007, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[38]  H. Sauro,et al.  MAPK Cascades as Feedback Amplifiers , 2007, 0710.5195.

[39]  H. Sauro.  Modularity defined , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[40]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[41]  J. Keasling.  Synthetic biology for synthetic chemistry. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[42]  Julien F. Ollivier,et al.  Colored extrinsic fluctuations and stochastic gene expression , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[43]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Regulatory activity revealed by dynamic correlations in gene expression noise , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[44]  R. Yu,et al.  Fus3 generates negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast pheromone response , 2008, Nature.

[45]  M. L. Simpson,et al.  Transient-mediated fate determination in a transcriptional circuit of HIV , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[46]  Weston R. Whitaker,et al.  Toward scalable parts families for predictable design of biological circuits. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.

[47]  Herbert M. Sauro,et al.  Antimony: a modular model definition language , 2009, Bioinform..

[48]  K. Kim,et al.  Measuring the Degree of Modularity from Gene Expression Noise in Gene Regulatory Circuits , 2009, 0910.5522.

[49]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[50]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  On the compromise between retroactivity attenuation and noise amplification in gene regulatory networks , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[51]  Priscilla E. M. Purnick,et al.  The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[52]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .