Understanding the Role of Places and Activities on Mobile Phone Interaction and Usage Patterns

User interaction patterns with mobile apps and notifications are generally complex due to the many factors involved. However a deep understanding of what influences them can lead to more acceptable applications that are able to deliver information at the right time. In this paper, we present for the first time an in-depth analysis of interaction behavior with notifications in relation to the location and activity of users. We conducted an in-situ study for a period of two weeks to collect more than 36,000 notifications, 17,000 instances of application usage, 77,000 location samples, and 487 days of daily activity entries from 26 students at a UK university. Our results show that users’ attention towards new notifications and willingness to accept them are strongly linked to the location they are in and in minor part to their current activity. We consider both users’ receptivity and attentiveness, and we show that different response behaviors are associated to different locations. These findings are fundamental from a design perspective since they allow us to understand how certain types of places are linked to specific types of interaction behavior. This information can be used as a basis for the development of novel intelligent mobile applications and services.

[1]  Nathan Eagle,et al.  Community Computing: Comparisons between Rural and Urban Societies Using Mobile Phone Data , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[2]  Shwetak N. Patel,et al.  Why would you do that? predicting the uses and gratifications behind smartphone-usage behaviors , 2016, UbiComp.

[3]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Notifications and awareness: a field study of alert usage and preferences , 2010, CSCW '10.

[4]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Investigating causality in human behavior from smartphone sensor data: a quasi-experimental approach , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[6]  Panagiotis Papapetrou,et al.  Social context discovery from temporal app use patterns , 2014, UbiComp Adjunct.

[7]  Steve Benford,et al.  Effects of content and time of delivery on receptivity to mobile interruptions , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[8]  Qiang Xu,et al.  Identifying diverse usage behaviors of smartphone apps , 2011, IMC '11.

[9]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface , 2001, INTERACT.

[10]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  InterruptMe: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications , 2014, UbiComp.

[11]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution , 2004, CHI.

[12]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  My Phone and Me: Understanding People's Receptivity to Mobile Notifications , 2016, CHI.

[13]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  The evaluative image of the city , 1997 .

[14]  David Chu,et al.  Practical prediction and prefetch for faster access to applications on mobile phones , 2013, UbiComp.

[15]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  PrefMiner: mining user's preferences for intelligent mobile notification management , 2016, UbiComp.

[16]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Diversity in smartphone usage , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[17]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Didn't you see my message?: predicting attentiveness to mobile instant messages , 2014, CHI.

[18]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Large-scale assessment of mobile notifications , 2014, CHI.

[19]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Research in the Wild , 2017, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics.

[20]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Personality and self reported mobile phone use , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Clayton Shepard,et al.  Exploring iPhone usage: the influence of socioeconomic differences on smartphone adoption, usage and usability , 2012, Mobile HCI.

[22]  John F. Rauthmann,et al.  Principles of Situation Research: Towards a Better Understanding of Psychological Situations , 2015 .

[23]  Ye Xu,et al.  Preference, context and communities: a multi-faceted approach to predicting smartphone app usage patterns , 2013, ISWC '13.

[24]  Daniel Gatica-Perez,et al.  Mining large-scale smartphone data for personality studies , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[25]  Martin Pielot,et al.  An in-situ study of mobile phone notifications , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[26]  Kazunori Hanyu,et al.  VISUAL PROPERTIES AND AFFECTIVE APPRAISALS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN DAYLIGHT , 2000 .

[27]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[28]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[29]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Context-aware recommender systems , 2008, RecSys '08.

[30]  Mika Raento,et al.  ContextPhone: a prototyping platform for context-aware mobile applications , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[31]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Contextual experience sampling of mobile application micro-usage , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[32]  Emiliano Miluzzo,et al.  A survey of mobile phone sensing , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[33]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Designing content-driven intelligent notification mechanisms for mobile applications , 2015, UbiComp.

[34]  N. Bolger,et al.  Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance , 2001, INTERACT.