Recent Progress in Structure-Based Evaluation of Compound Promiscuity

In chemistry and drug discovery, compound promiscuity is a controversial issue and often viewed differently. On the one hand, promiscuity has a clear-cut negative connotation, as promiscuous behavior of small molecules is often associated with nonspecific binding or assay artifacts. On the other hand, it is also well-established that compounds frequently interact with multiple targets including distantly related or unrelated proteins. In drug discovery, multitarget activity of small molecules receives increasing attention because it is therapeutically relevant, giving rise to desired or undesired pharmacological effects. Exploration of compound promiscuity is far from being simple because true and artificial activities are often difficult to discern. In light of these complications, X-ray structures of ligand–target complexes provide a wealth of information about molecular promiscuity, which is just beginning to be recognized and explored. Systematic analysis of structurally confirmed binding events invol...

[1]  Alex M. Clark,et al.  2D Depiction of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Polypharmacology: challenges and opportunities in drug discovery. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  B. Shoichet Screening in a spirit haunted world. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[4]  T. Tomašič,et al.  Rhodanine as a privileged scaffold in drug discovery. , 2009, Current medicinal chemistry.

[5]  K. Shokat,et al.  Targeting the cancer kinome through polypharmacology , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  S. Fetzner,et al.  Quercetin 2,4-Dioxygenase Activates Dioxygen in a Side-On O2-Ni Complex. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Compound promiscuity: what can we learn from current data? , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[8]  J. Irwin,et al.  An Aggregation Advisor for Ligand Discovery. , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  M. Rosini,et al.  Polypharmacology: the rise of multitarget drugs over combination therapies. , 2014, Future medicinal chemistry.

[10]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Determining the Degree of Promiscuity of Extensively Assayed Compounds , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  J. Peters Polypharmacology - foe or friend? , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  Jeffrey R. Huth,et al.  Enhancement of chemical rules for predicting compound reactivity towards protein thiol groups , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[13]  John P. Overington,et al.  ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Erin E. Carlson,et al.  Chemical probes of UDP-galactopyranose mutase. , 2006, Chemistry & biology.

[15]  Fernanda Borges,et al.  Chromone as a Privileged Scaffold in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  How Frequently Are Pan-Assay Interference Compounds Active? Large-Scale Analysis of Screening Data Reveals Diverse Activity Profiles, Low Global Hit Frequency, and Many Consistently Inactive Compounds. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Binding of Protein Kinase Inhibitors to Synapsin I Inferred from Pair-Wise Binding Site Similarity Measurements , 2010, PloS one.

[18]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Promiscuous Ligands from Experimentally Determined Structures, Binding Conformations, and Protein Family-Dependent Interaction Hotspots , 2019, ACS omega.

[19]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Computational design of new molecular scaffolds for medicinal chemistry, part II: generalization of analog series-based scaffolds , 2017, Future science OA.

[20]  Ewgenij Proschak,et al.  Polypharmacology by Design: A Medicinal Chemist's Perspective on Multitargeting Compounds. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  A. Cavalli,et al.  Multitarget Drug Discovery and Polypharmacology , 2016, ChemMedChem.

[22]  John P. Overington,et al.  Structural and Functional View of Polypharmacology , 2016, bioRxiv.

[23]  Dimitrios H Roukos,et al.  Networks medicine: from reductionism to evidence of complex dynamic biomolecular interactions. , 2011, Pharmacogenomics.

[24]  Mahesh Hegde,et al.  Quercetin, a Natural Flavonoid Interacts with DNA, Arrests Cell Cycle and Causes Tumor Regression by Activating Mitochondrial Pathway of Apoptosis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  A. Hopkins Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[26]  C. Schofield,et al.  Rhodanine hydrolysis leads to potent thioenolate mediated metallo-β-lactamase inhibition. , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[27]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  J. Baell,et al.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  B. Shoichet,et al.  A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[30]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  X-ray-Structure-Based Identification of Compounds with Activity against Targets from Different Families and Generation of Templates for Multitarget Ligand Design , 2018, ACS omega.

[31]  R. Solé,et al.  The topology of drug-target interaction networks: implicit dependence on drug properties and target families. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[32]  R. Morphy,et al.  Designed multiple ligands. An emerging drug discovery paradigm. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  R. Solé,et al.  Data completeness—the Achilles heel of drug-target networks , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  Lisa K. Woolhiser,et al.  Development of a Novel Lead that Targets M. tuberculosis Polyketide Synthase 13 , 2017, Cell.

[35]  John P. Overington,et al.  Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs? , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  Michael Schroeder,et al.  Correction: Drug Promiscuity in PDB: Protein Binding Site Similarity Is Key , 2013, PLoS ONE.

[37]  J Willem M Nissink,et al.  Seven Year Itch: Pan-Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) in 2017—Utility and Limitations , 2017, ACS chemical biology.

[38]  Patrick R. Griffin,et al.  PubChem promiscuity: a web resource for gathering compound promiscuity data from PubChem , 2012, Bioinform..

[39]  Jayme L. Dahlin,et al.  PAINS in the Assay: Chemical Mechanisms of Assay Interference and Promiscuous Enzymatic Inhibition Observed during a Sulfhydryl-Scavenging HTS , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  R. Kurumbail,et al.  Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents , 1996, Nature.

[41]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Machine Learning Distinguishes with High Accuracy between Pan-Assay Interference Compounds That Are Promiscuous or Represent Dark Chemical Matter. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  A. Pîrnău,et al.  Binding interaction of indomethacin with human serum albumin. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[43]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Highly Promiscuous Small Molecules from Biological Screening Assays Include Many Pan-Assay Interference Compounds but Also Candidates for Polypharmacology. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  J. Bajorath,et al.  X-ray Structures of Target-Ligand Complexes Containing Compounds with Assay Interference Potential. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  Thomas Mendgen,et al.  Privileged scaffolds or promiscuous binders: a comparative study on rhodanines and related heterocycles in medicinal chemistry. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[46]  Mineyuki Mizuguchi,et al.  Structural Insight into the Interactions between Death-Associated Protein Kinase 1 and Natural Flavonoids. , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[47]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Phantom PAINS: Problems with the Utility of Alerts for Pan-Assay INterference CompoundS , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[48]  J. Baell,et al.  Chemistry: Chemical con artists foil drug discovery , 2014, Nature.

[49]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[50]  K. Morikawa,et al.  The nuclear receptor PPARγ individually responds to serotonin‐ and fatty acid‐metabolites , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[51]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs , 2009, Nature.

[52]  C. Chong,et al.  New uses for old drugs , 2007, Nature.

[53]  Zukang Feng,et al.  Ligand Depot: a data warehouse for ligands bound to macromolecules , 2004, Bioinform..

[54]  Kenneth M Merz,et al.  The Ecstasy and Agony of Assay Interference Compounds. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[55]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[56]  Jonathan B Baell,et al.  Feeling Nature's PAINS: Natural Products, Natural Product Drugs, and Pan Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS). , 2016, Journal of natural products.

[57]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Computational Method for the Systematic Identification of Analog Series and Key Compounds Representing Series and Their Biological Activity Profiles. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[58]  Sujata Sharma,et al.  Simultaneous inhibition of anti‐coagulation and inflammation: crystal structure of phospholipase A2 complexed with indomethacin at 1.4 Å resolution reveals the presence of the new common ligand‐binding site , 2009, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[59]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Badapple: promiscuity patterns from noisy evidence , 2016, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[60]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Entering the ‘big data’ era in medicinal chemistry: molecular promiscuity analysis revisited , 2017, Future science OA.

[61]  Helgi I. Ingólfsson,et al.  Phytochemicals Perturb Membranes and Promiscuously Alter Protein Function , 2014, ACS chemical biology.

[62]  Jayme L. Dahlin,et al.  The Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Curcumin , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.