An AI-based workflow for estimating shale barrier configurations from SAGD production histories

An artificial intelligence (AI)-based workflow is deployed to develop and test procedures for estimating shale barrier configurations from SAGD production profiles. The data employed in this project are derived from a set of synthetic SAGD reservoir simulations based on petrophysical properties and operational constraints representative of Athabasca oil sands reservoirs. Initially, a two-dimensional reservoir simulation model is employed. The underlying model is homogeneous. Its petrophysical properties, such as the porosity, permeability, initial oil saturation and net pay thickness, have been taken from average values for several pads in Suncor’s Firebag project. Reservoir heterogeneities are simulated by superimposing sets of idealized shale barrier configurations on the homogeneous model. The location and geometry of each shale barrier is parameterized by a unique set of indices. The resulting heterogeneous model is subjected to flow simulation to simulate SAGD production. Next, a two-step workflow is followed: (1) a network model based on AI tools is constructed to match the output of the reservoir simulation (shale indices are inputs, while production rate is the output) for a known training set of shale barrier configurations; (2) for a new SAGD production history generated via reservoir simulation with a shale barrier configuration that is unknown to the AI model generated in Step 1, an optimization scheme based on a genetic algorithm approach is adopted to perturb the shale indices until the difference between the target production history and the production history predicted from the AI model is minimized. A number of cases have been tested. The results show a good agreement between the shale barrier configurations predicted by the AI model with the configurations used to generate production histories in the reservoir simulation model (i.e., the “true” model). Thus, this optimization workflow offers potential to become an alternative tool for indirect inference of the uncertain distribution of shale barriers in SAGD reservoirs from data capturing field performance. This work highlights the potential of an AI-based workflow to infer the presence and distribution of heterogeneous shale barriers from field SAGD production time series data. It presents an innovative parameterization scheme suitable for representing heterogeneous characteristics of shale barriers. If this approach proves to be successful, it could allow the distribution of shale barriers to be inferred together with the impact of these barriers on SAGD performance. This would provide a basis for developing operating strategies to reduce the impact of the barriers.

[1]  S. Kabanikhin Definitions and examples of inverse and ill-posed problems , 2008 .

[2]  H. Dehghanpour,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Emulsion Flow at the Edge of a Steam Chamber During a Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process , 2016 .

[3]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Support vector machine , 2013 .

[4]  Lili Guo,et al.  Extreme learning machine with kernel model based on deep learning , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[5]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[6]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks and Learning Machines , 2010 .

[7]  Margot Gerritsen,et al.  Effects of Reservoir Heterogeneities on the Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process , 2007 .

[8]  Michael R. W. Dawson,et al.  The Multilayer Perceptron , 2008 .

[9]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Scatter Search Metaheuristic Applied to the History Matching Problem , 2006 .

[10]  Eugene Fedutenko,et al.  Time-Dependent Neural Network Based Proxy Modeling of SAGD Process , 2014 .

[11]  Serhat Akin Mathematical modeling of steam-assisted gravity drainage , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[12]  I. Gates,et al.  Multiphase flow at the edge of a steam chamber , 2010 .

[13]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Evaluation of Monte Carlo Methods for Assessing Uncertainty , 2003 .

[14]  J. Leung,et al.  A Proxy Model for Predicting SAGD Production From Reservoirs Containing Shale Barriers , 2016, Journal of Energy Resources Technology.

[15]  Alexandre Castellini,et al.  Constructing reservoir flow simulator proxies using genetic programming for history matching and production forecast uncertainty analysis , 2008 .

[16]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  Effects Of Reservoir Heterogeneities On Heavy Oil Recovery By Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage , 1992 .

[17]  W. D. Kruger,et al.  Determining Areal Permeability Distribution by Calculations , 1961 .

[18]  David Zhang,et al.  Robust Visual Knowledge Transfer via Extreme Learning Machine-Based Domain Adaptation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Paul Morris,et al.  A Practical Approach to History-matching Large, Multi-well SAGD Simulation Models: A MacKay River Case Study , 2013 .

[20]  P. Jacquard,et al.  Permeability Distribution From Field Pressure Data , 1965 .

[21]  Seyed Ali Feizabadi,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Building History-Matched Geomodels to Understand Complex Long Lake Oil Sands Reservoirs, Part 2: Simulation , 2014 .

[22]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  A framework to integrate history matching and geostatistical modeling using genetic algorithm and direct search methods , 2008 .

[23]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Ensemble Kalman filter for automatic history matching of geologic facies , 2005 .

[24]  Carl Kingsford,et al.  What are decision trees? , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Olivier Gosselin,et al.  Use of Prior Information in Gradient-Based History Matching , 2004 .

[26]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  A Stochastic Optimization Algorithm for Automatic History Matching , 2007 .

[27]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  Autoencoder-derived Features as Inputs to Classification Algorithms for Predicting Well Failures , 2015 .

[28]  Juliana Y. Leung,et al.  Characterizing the Effects of Lean Zones and Shale Distribution in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Recovery Performance , 2015 .

[29]  Adnan Khashman,et al.  Deep learning in vision-based static hand gesture recognition , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[30]  Darrell Whitley,et al.  A genetic algorithm tutorial , 1994, Statistics and Computing.

[31]  J. Hadamard Sur les problemes aux derive espartielles et leur signification physique , 1902 .

[32]  Juliana Y. Leung,et al.  Practical implementation of knowledge-based approaches for steam-assisted gravity drainage production analysis , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Performance Study of Multilayer Perceptrons in a Low-Cost Electronic Nose , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[34]  M. Le Ravalec,et al.  Heterogeneity Impact on SAGD Process Performance in Mobile Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 2009 .

[35]  M. L. Wasserman,et al.  A New Algorithm for Automatic History Matching , 1974 .

[36]  John C. Reis,et al.  A Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Model For Tar Sands: Radial Geometry , 1992 .

[37]  R. Butler Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen , 1991 .

[38]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in‐situ steam heating , 1981 .

[39]  Ehsan Amirian,et al.  Integrated cluster analysis and artificial neural network modeling for steam-assisted gravity drainage performance prediction in heterogeneous reservoirs , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Zaher Mundher Yaseen,et al.  RBFNN-based model for heavy metal prediction for different climatic and pollution conditions , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[41]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  A New Approach To The Modelling Of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage , 1985 .

[42]  Chaodong Yang,et al.  Reservoir Model Uncertainty Quantification Through Computer-Assisted History Matching , 2007 .

[43]  M. Pooladi-Darvish,et al.  Steam Heating of Fractured Formations Containing Heavy Oil: Basic Premises and a Single-Block Analytical Model , 1994 .

[44]  Zukui Li,et al.  Initial Sampling of Ensemble for Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage-Reservoir History Matching , 2015 .

[45]  K. C. Yeung,et al.  Numerical Study of the SAGD Process in the Burnt Lake Oil Sands Lease , 1995 .

[46]  Jonathan Carter,et al.  A parallel real-coded genetic algorithm for history matching and its application to a real petroleum reservoir , 2007 .

[47]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Investigation of a Stochastic Optimization Method for Automatic History Matching of SAGD Processes , 2006 .

[48]  Yasin Hajizadeh,et al.  Ant colony optimization for history matching and uncertainty quantification of reservoir models , 2011 .

[49]  Jef Caers,et al.  Representing Spatial Uncertainty Using Distances and Kernels , 2009 .

[50]  David Zhang,et al.  Evolutionary Cost-Sensitive Extreme Learning Machine , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[51]  Colin Card,et al.  Incorporating 4D Seismic Steam Chamber Location Information into Assisted History Matching for A SAGD Simulation , 2013 .