Reassessing the Dimensions of Temperamental Individuality Across the Life Span:The Revised Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R)

The principal objective of this research was to identify age-continuous features of temperament, across an age span from early childhood to late adolescence/early adulthood through the construction of a new temperament measure, the Revised Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R). Limitations of an extant temperament measure, the Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS), were considered in the present scale construction research. A temperament questionnaire composed of an initial pool of 106 items was administered to three different samples-preschoolers, elementary school children, and late adolescents/early adults. The analyses included interrater agreement for content validity of items, item-total scale analyses, factor analyses, and the determination of internal consistency estimates of temperament dimensions for each sample. A nine factor model of temperament emerged for the preschool and elementary school samples, whereas a ten factor model emerged for the late adolescent/early adult sample. Supporting the factorial validity of the DOTS-R across the three age samples, results indicated high congruity for pairwise comparisons of factor loading patterns across samples, and moderate to high levels of internal consistency for each of the temperament dimensions across samples. Data supportive of the predictive validity of the DOTS-R for early and late adolescents are noted as well.

[1]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  Sociological Methodology, 1969. , 1969 .

[2]  S C McDevitt,et al.  The measurement of temperament in 3--7 year old children. , 1978, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  P. O. White,et al.  PROMAX: A QUICK METHOD FOR ROTATION TO OBLIQUE SIMPLE STRUCTURE , 1964 .

[4]  S. McDevitt,et al.  The Middle Childhood Temperament Questionnaire , 1982, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[5]  Jay Magidson,et al.  Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models , 1979 .

[6]  J. Kagan Reflection--impulsivity: the generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. , 1966, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  R. Lerner,et al.  The „Goodness of fit”︁ model of temperament‐context relations: Interaction or correlation? , 1986 .

[8]  J. E. Jackson,et al.  Factor analysis, an applied approach , 1983 .

[9]  S C McDevitt,et al.  Revision of the Infant Temperament Questionnaire. , 1978, Pediatrics.

[10]  R. Lerner,et al.  The Role of Temperament in Dating Relationships among Young Adults. , 1984 .

[11]  E. Labouvie,et al.  Identity versus equivalence of psychological measures and constructs. , 1980 .

[12]  R. Plomin,et al.  Temperament in early childhood. , 1977, Journal of personality assessment.

[13]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[14]  M. Kohn Social competence, symptoms, and underachievement in childhood: A longitudinal perspective , 1977 .

[15]  P. Bentler MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS WITH LATENT VARIABLES: CAUSAL MODELING , 1980 .

[16]  S. Scarr,et al.  How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype greater than environment effects. , 1983, Child development.

[17]  K. Lindhagen,et al.  Behavioral Dimensions in One-Year-Olds and Dimensional Stability in Infancy , 1980 .

[18]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment , 1973 .

[19]  R. Plomin,et al.  The Study of temperament : changes, continuities, and challenges , 1986 .

[20]  Andrew L. Comrey,et al.  Common methodological problems in factor analytic studies. , 1978 .

[21]  T. Wachs,et al.  The Study of Early Temperament: Measurement and Conceptual Issues. , 1982 .

[22]  L. R. Goldberg Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: A psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. , 1981 .

[23]  R. Lerner,et al.  Temperament and elementary school children's actual and rated academic performance: a test of a 'goodness-of-fit' model. , 1985, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[24]  G. Bohrnstedt,et al.  Social Measurement: Current Issues , 1981 .

[25]  M. Lamb 6 – Influence of the Child on Marital Quality and Family Interaction During the Prenatal, Perinatal, and Infancy Periods1 , 1978 .

[26]  A. Buss,et al.  A Temperament Theory of Personality Development , 1975 .

[27]  Joan Lipsitz,et al.  Growing up forgotten : a review of research and programs concerning early adolescence , 1980 .

[28]  A. Spiro,et al.  Assessing the Dimensions of Temperamental Individuality across the Life Span: The Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS). , 1982 .

[29]  J. Lerner The Role of Temperament in Psychosocial Adaptation in Early Adolescents: A Test of a “Goodness of Fit” Model , 1983 .

[30]  H. Goldsmith,et al.  Toward a Theory of Infant Temperament , 1982 .

[31]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[32]  B. Muthén,et al.  Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models , 1977 .

[33]  A. Comrey,et al.  Comparison of Factor Analytic Results with Two-Choice and Seven-Choice Personality Item Formats , 1982 .

[34]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Relation Between Item Format and the Structure of the Eysenck Personality Inventory , 1978 .

[35]  H. Harman Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[36]  P. Baltes,et al.  Life-span Developmental Psychology: Introduction To Research Methods , 1977 .

[37]  H. Birch,et al.  Temperament and Behavior Disorders in Children , 1968 .

[38]  S. Chess,et al.  Temperament and Development , 1977 .