FDG uptake after intraarterial chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

Summary Aim: The intraarterial chemotherapy (i.a. CHT) using high dose cisplatin combined with systemic neutralization in patients with head and neck cancer (HNSCC) is used to reduce the tumor volume preoperatively. Aim of the study is the evaluation of the influence of i.a. CHT on the metabolism of fluor-18-deoxyglucose (FDG) in the primary and lymph nodes (LN). The value of FDG positron emission tomography (PET) preoperative and as follow-up method after i.a. CHT is examined. Patients, methods: Altogether 16 patients with HNSCC underwent two preoperative FDG PET examinations: the baseline examination one week before and the follow-up three weeks after i.a. CHT. The SUVmax values of the primary and the LN and LN metastases were evaluated and compared with each other and the histopathology. Results: The SUVmax value of the primary decreased after i.a. CHT significantly from a median (25th percentile/ 75th percentile) of 6.4 (4.1/ 7.8) to 3.6 (2.4/ 6.7) (p = 0.01). In 11 out of 16 patients cervical LN metastases were detected. The cervical LN metastases showed a decrease of the SUVmax value from 3.6 (2.3/ 4.8) in the pretreatment examination to 2.3 (1.7/ 3.6) after i.a. CHT (p = 0.008). Only in one patient with LN metastases the SUVmax of the nodes increased. The histopathologically measured size of the LN metastases ranged from 2 to 30 mm. Non malignant LN did not reveal a significant SUVmax decrease after i.a. CHT (p = 0.13). Conclusions: As expected, primaries of HNSCC showed a significant reduction of SUV after i.a. CHT. Compared to the primary the SUVmax decrease in LN metastases was less, but also significant. Since cytotoxic levels of cisplatin do not occur systemic, postinflammatory reactions of the LN or a lymphatic drainage of the chemotherapeutic drug into the LN could be an explanation. PET for staging of HNSCC must thus be performed prior to i.a. CHT.

[1]  K. Engels,et al.  The prognostic value of FDG PET in head and neck cancer. Correlation with histopathology. , 2005, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[2]  C. Patlak,et al.  A critical evaluation of the principles governing the advantages of intra-arterial infusions , 1974, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[3]  M. Dietlein,et al.  18F-FDG PET for detecting recurrent head and neck cancer, local lymph node involvement and distant metastases , 2004, Nuklearmedizin.

[4]  A. Kovács Intra-arterial induction high-dose chemotherapy with cisplatin for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: long-term results , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in restaging of colorectal cancer , 2003, Nuklearmedizin.

[6]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  PET with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of non-small cell lung cancer , 2003, Nuklearmedizin.

[7]  B. Turowski,et al.  Cisplatin tumor concentrations after intra‐arterial cisplatin infusion or embolization in patients with oral cancer , 2003, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[8]  L. Strauss,et al.  PET-FDG as predictor of therapy response in patients with colorectal carcinoma. , 2003, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[9]  N. Sadato,et al.  Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (MRI, CT, and 67Ga scintigraphy) in assessment of combined intraarterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  E. Yoshikawa,et al.  Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  L. Geworski,et al.  Use of recovery coefficients as a test of system linearity of response in positron emission tomography (PET). , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  T. Klenzner,et al.  Lymph node staging in extracranial head and neck cancer with FDG PET – appropriate uptake period and size-dependence of the results , 2002, Nuklearmedizin.

[13]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Combined image interpretation of computed tomography and hybrid PET in head and neck cancer , 2002, Nuklearmedizin.

[15]  Elisabeth Kjellén,et al.  FDG PET studies during treatment: Prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2002, Head & neck.

[16]  G. Brix,et al.  [Recovery coefficients for the quantification of the arterial input functions from dynamic PET measurements: experimental and theoretical determination]. , 2002, NuclearMedicine.

[17]  B. Turowski,et al.  Combined modality treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancer including neoadjuvant intraarterial cisplatin and radical surgery followed by concurrent radiation and chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel - three year results of a pilot study. , 2002, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[18]  L. Jäger,et al.  [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[19]  K. Hahn,et al.  [F-18]FDG imaging of head and neck tumors: Comparison of hybrid PET, dedicated PET and CT , 2001, Nuklearmedizin.

[20]  R. Baum,et al.  Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI. , 2000, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[21]  L. Strauss Sensitivity and specificity of positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of lymph node metastases. , 2000, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[22]  R L Wahl,et al.  Reevaluation of the standardized uptake value for FDG: variations with body weight and methods for correction. , 1999, Radiology.

[23]  B. Nowak,et al.  Diagnostic Evaluation of Malignant Head and Neck Cancer by F-18-FDG PET Compared to CT/MRI , 1999, Nuklearmedizin.

[24]  S. Howell,et al.  Phase I study of highly selective supradose cisplatin infusions for advanced head and neck cancer. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  R. Caprioli,et al.  Clinical pharmacology of intraarterial cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II). , 1983, Cancer research.