Pervasiveness of the breakdown of self-interacting vector field theories

Various groups recently argued that self-interacting vector field theories lack a well-defined time evolution when the field grows to large amplitudes, which has drastic consequences for models in gravity and high energy theory. Such field amplitudes can be a result of an external driving mechanism, or occur intrinsically, due to large values of the field and its derivatives in the initial data. This brings a natural question: is small amplitude initial data guaranteed to evolve indefinitely in these theories in the absence of an outside driving term? We answer this question in the negative, demonstrating that arbitrarily low amplitude initial data can still lead to the breakdown of the theory. Namely, ingoing spherically symmetric wave packets in more than one spatial dimensions grow as an inverse power of the radius, and their amplitudes can generically reach high enough values where time evolution ceases to exist. This simple example further establishes the pervasiveness of the pathology of self-interacting vector field theories.

[1]  Fethi M. Ramazanoğlu,et al.  Coordinate Singularities of Self-Interacting Vector Field Theories. , 2022, Physical review letters.

[2]  N. Yunes,et al.  Where and why does Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory break down? , 2022, Physical Review D.

[3]  W. East,et al.  Nonlinear studies of binary black hole mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity , 2022, Physical Review D.

[4]  E. Berti,et al.  Ghost Instabilities in Self-Interacting Vector Fields: The Problem with Proca Fields. , 2022, Physical review letters.

[5]  E. Barausse,et al.  The well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for self-interacting vector fields , 2022, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[6]  K. Aoki,et al.  Resolving the pathologies of self-interacting Proca fields: A case study of Proca stars , 2022, Physical Review D.

[7]  Fethi M. Ramazanoğlu,et al.  Intrinsic Pathology of Self-Interacting Vector Fields. , 2022, Physical review letters.

[8]  W. East Vortex String Formation in Black Hole Superradiance of a Dark Photon with the Higgs Mechanism. , 2022, Physical review letters.

[9]  Hong-Yi Zhang,et al.  Singularity Problem for Interacting Massive Vectors. , 2022, Physical review letters.

[10]  Fethi M. Ramazanoğlu,et al.  Instability of vectorized stars , 2021, Physical Review D.

[11]  Fethi M. Ramazanoğlu,et al.  Ghost of vector fields in compact stars , 2021, Physical Review D.

[12]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Destabilization of Black Holes and Stars by Generalized Proca Fields. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[13]  B. Kleihaus,et al.  Spontaneously vectorized Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes , 2021, Physics Letters B.

[14]  N. Sanchis-Gual,et al.  The imitation game: Proca stars that can mimic the Schwarzschild shadow , 2021, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[15]  Eugen Radu,et al.  Asymptotically Flat, Spherical, Self-Interacting Scalar, Dirac and Proca Stars , 2020, Symmetry.

[16]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[17]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Aspects of nonlinear effect on black hole superradiance , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[18]  V. Cardoso,et al.  Electromagnetism and hidden vector fields in modified gravity theories: Spontaneous and induced vectorization , 2019, Physical Review D.

[19]  M. Minamitsuji,et al.  Vector boson star solutions with a quartic order self-interaction , 2018, 1805.09867.

[20]  S. Tsujikawa,et al.  Relativistic stars in vector-tensor theories , 2017, 1711.08713.

[21]  S. Tsujikawa,et al.  Black holes in vector-tensor theories , 2017, 1706.05115.

[22]  Fethi M. Ramazanouglu Spontaneous growth of vector fields in gravity , 2017, 1706.01056.

[23]  C. Herdeiro,et al.  Can black hole superradiance be induced by galactic plasmas , 2017, 1701.02034.

[24]  Rampei Kimura,et al.  Extended vector-tensor theories , 2016, 1608.07066.

[25]  S. Tsujikawa,et al.  Beyond generalized Proca theories , 2016, 1605.05565.

[26]  S. Mukohyama,et al.  Cosmology in generalized Proca theories , 2016, 1603.05806.

[27]  Gong-Bo Zhao,et al.  Screening fifth forces in generalized Proca theories , 2016, 1602.00371.

[28]  Y. Rodríguez,et al.  Generalized Proca action for an Abelian vector field , 2015, 1511.03101.

[29]  M. Shibata NUMERICAL RELATIVITY , 2015 .

[30]  V. Cardoso,et al.  Nonlinear interactions between black holes and Proca fields , 2015, 1505.00797.

[31]  Lavinia Heisenberg Generalization of the Proca Action , 2014, 1402.7026.

[32]  E. Gourgoulhon 3+1 Formalism in General Relativity: Bases of Numerical Relativity , 2012 .

[33]  W. Heisenberg,et al.  Consequences of Dirac's theory of positrons , 2006 .

[34]  P. Shukla,et al.  Nonlinear collective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma interactions , 2006, hep-ph/0602123.

[35]  B. Holstein Introduction to effective field theory , 2000, nucl-th/0010015.

[36]  A. Proca Sur la théorie ondulatoire des électrons positifs et négatifs , 1936 .

[37]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[38]  J. K. Nilsen,et al.  Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , 2017 .

[39]  E. Gourgoulhon 3 + 1 formalism in general relativity , 2012 .

[40]  N. Radicella Vector Theories in Cosmology , 2008 .

[41]  Heinz-Otto Kreiss,et al.  Methods for the approximate solution of time dependent problems , 1973 .