Microchambers and macrochambers in heel pads: are they functionally different?

The heel pad consists of a superficial microchamber layer and a deep macrochamber layer. This study highlights the different biomechanical behaviors between the microchamber and macrochamber layers using ultrasonography. The heel pad in each left foot of six healthy volunteers aged approximately 25 yr old was measured with a device consisting of a 10-MHz linear-array ultrasound transducer and a load cell. The testing heels were loaded on the ultrasound transducer with a loading velocity of approximately 0.5 cm/s and were withdrawn when the specified maximum stress (158 kPa) was reached. Unloaded tissue thickness, end-loaded thickness, deformation proportion, average deformation, and rebound rates and elastic modulus of the microchamber and macrochamber layers were assessed. The unloaded thickness of the microchamber layer was approximately 30% of the macrochamber layer. The microchamber layer also had significantly less unloaded thickness, end-loaded thickness, mean deformation rate, mean rebound rate, and deformation proportion than the macrochamber layer. A significant difference between the unloaded and end-loaded thickness in the macrochamber layer was observed. The average soft tissue deformation rate was significantly different from the rebound rate in the microchamber layer. A similar trend was detected in the macrochamber layer. The elastic modulus of the microchamber layer was 450 kPa (SD 240), which was nearly 10 times of that in the macrochamber layer. In conclusion, ultrasound can identify the heterogeneous tissue properties of the heel pad. The macrochamber layer responds to loading with large deformation, and the microchamber layer has a high degree of tissue stiffness.

[1]  R. F. Ker,et al.  The effects of isolation on the mechanics of the human heel pad. , 1996, Journal of anatomy.

[2]  Dequan Zou,et al.  Plantar tissue stiffness in patients with diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  F. Tang,et al.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  R. F. Ker,et al.  The mechanical properties of the human subcalcaneal fat pad in compression. , 1990, Journal of anatomy.

[5]  T C Hsu,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of the mechanical properties of the sole under the metatarsal heads , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  Y. Shau,et al.  Mechanical properties of heel pads reconstructed with flaps. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  Y. Shau,et al.  Altered heel‐pad mechanical properties in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2000, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[8]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[9]  I. Haslock,et al.  Reliability of weight-bearing heel pad thickness measurements by ultrasound. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  Wen-Chung Tsai,et al.  Effects of aging on the plantar soft tissue properties under the metatarsal heads at different impact velocities. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  S. Cowin,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd ed. , 1994 .

[12]  G. Baroud,et al.  Material properties of the human calcaneal fat pad in compression: experiment and theory. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  U. Jørgensen,et al.  Achillodynia and loss of heel pad shock absorbency , 1985, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  E Blechschmidt,et al.  The Structure of the Calcaneal Padding , 1982, Foot & ankle.

[15]  Yavuz Başar,et al.  Finite element formulation of the Ogden material model with application to rubber-like shells , 1998 .

[16]  I. Spears,et al.  The effect of heel-pad thickness and loading protocol on measured heel-pad stiffness and a standardized protocol for inter-subject comparability. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  C. Grunfeld,et al.  Heel pad thickness: determination by high‐resolution ultrasonography. , 1985, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[18]  John L. Ricci,et al.  Histology and Histomorphometric Analysis of the Normal and Atrophic Heel Fat Pad , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[19]  Peter R. Francis,et al.  The mechanical properties of the heel pad in elderly adults , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[20]  J Ophir,et al.  Elastographic imaging. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  A F Mak,et al.  Biomechanical assessment of plantar foot tissue in diabetic patients using an ultrasound indentation system. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  S. Prichasuk,et al.  The heel-pad compressibility. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  Y. Itzchak,et al.  In vivo biomechanical behavior of the human heel pad during the stance phase of gait. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  A. Boulton,et al.  Efficacy of injected liquid silicone in the diabetic foot to reduce risk factors for ulceration: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. , 2000, Diabetes care.