Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England

A commitment to deliver high quality care should be at the heart of everyday clinical practice. In the past many health professionals have watched as board agendas and management meetings have become dominated by financial issues and activity targets. The government's white paper on the NHS in England outlines a new style of NHS that will redress this imbalance.1 For the first time, all health organisations will have a statutory duty to seek quality improvement through clinical governance. In the future, well managed organisations will be those in which financial control, service performance, and clinical quality are fully integrated at every level. #### Summary points Clinical governance is to be the main vehicle for continuously improving the quality of patient care and developing the capacity of the NHS in England to maintain high standards (including dealing with poor professional performance) It requires an organisation-wide transformation; clinical leadership and positive organisational cultures are particularly important Local professional self regulation will be the key to dealing with the complex problems of poor performance among clinicians New approaches are needed to enable the recognition and replication of good clinical practice to ensure that lessons are reliably learned from failures in standards of care The new concept has echoes of corporate governance, an initiative originally aimed at redressing failed standards in the business world through the Cadbury report2 and later extended to public services (including the NHS). The resonance of the two terms is important, for if clinical governance is to be successful it must be underpinned by the same strengths as corporate governance: it must be rigorous in its application, organisation-wide in its emphasis, accountable in its delivery, developmental in its thrust, and positive in its connotations. The introduction of clinical governance, aimed as it is at improving the quality of clinical care at …

[1]  N. Campbell,et al.  Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: randomised trial of effect on health , 1998, BMJ.

[2]  The need for evidence-based obstetrics , 1996, Evidence Based Medicine.

[3]  L. Donaldson Doctors with problems in an NHS workforce , 1994, BMJ.

[4]  A. Detsky,et al.  Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. , 1992, JAMA.

[5]  X Tonesk,et al.  Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. , 1992, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[6]  Steve Hanney,et al.  How Can Payback from Health Services Research Be Assessed? , 1996, Journal of health services research & policy.

[7]  D M Berwick,et al.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Kanter The Change Masters , 1983 .

[9]  D. Plamping,et al.  The new NHS. , 1991, BMJ.

[10]  B. Haynes,et al.  Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice , 1998, BMJ.

[11]  C. Hyde Using the Evidence: A Need for Quantity, Not Quality? , 1996, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  Paul J. Harrison,et al.  Closing the gap between research and practice , 1997, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  B. Stocking Implementing the findings of Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth in the United Kingdom. , 1993, The Milbank quarterly.

[14]  J Popay,et al.  Public health research and lay knowledge. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[15]  A D Oxman,et al.  Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. , 1995, JAMA.

[16]  A D Oxman,et al.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[17]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  K. Cimpl Clinical medical librarianship: a review of the literature. , 1985, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[19]  Finance, not learning needs, makes general practitioners attend courses: a database survey , 1997, BMJ.

[20]  A. Haines,et al.  Implementing findings of research , 1994, BMJ.

[21]  A. Hopkins,et al.  For Debate: Can contracts drive clinical care? , 1996, BMJ.

[22]  R. Haynes,et al.  Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. , 1992, JAMA.

[23]  G. Fereday Partners in care. , 1998, Nursing times.

[24]  Steve Iliffe,et al.  Innovations in services and the appliance of science , 1995, BMJ.

[25]  A. Haines,et al.  Setting priorities for research and development in the NHS: a case study on the interface between primary and secondary care , 1995, BMJ.

[26]  R. Thomson,et al.  Population based study of use of anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation in the community , 1997, BMJ.

[27]  A. Vanagunas,et al.  Principles of quality assurance. , 1979, QRB. Quality review bulletin.