A Two-Stage Approach for Network Constrained Unit Commitment Problem With Demand Response

This paper proposes a two-stage formulation for the day-ahead energy scheduling problem with demand response (DR). The first stage solves a network-constrained unit commitment problem with DR, to determine the hourly net demand changes (i.e., difference between final and initial demand values) happening at each DR bus1 along with the unit commitment schedule and ac load flow solution. Here, the objective is to maximize the social welfare which is expressed as the total utility of the demand side minus the total generation cost. The second stage solves an incentive or penalty minimization problem to determine the demand shifting and demand curtailment across the 24-h period at each DR bus, offering DR, based on the hourly net demand changes obtained during the first stage. The proposed formulation shows how demand shift and demand curtailment happening at different DR buses can be traced back to the hourly net demand changes occurring at the system level. The results, presented for a six-bus system and IEEE 118 bus system, show the benefits of including DR into the network-constrained unit commitment problem according to the proposed formulation.1Any bus which is capable of offering DR will be referred to as DR bus. It should not be mistaken for PQ bus referred in the load flow analysis.

[1]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Optimal Real-Time Pricing Algorithm Based on Utility Maximization for Smart Grid , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[2]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  The price elasticity of electricity demand in South Australia , 2011 .

[3]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  SCUC With Hourly Demand Response Considering Intertemporal Load Characteristics , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  Monica Greer,et al.  Electricity Cost Modeling Calculations , 2010 .

[5]  Mohammad Kazem Sheikh-El-Eslami,et al.  Investigation of Economic and Environmental-Driven Demand Response Measures Incorporating UC , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  Hamed Mohsenian Rad,et al.  Optimal Residential Load Control With Price Prediction in Real-Time Electricity Pricing Environments , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Long Zhao,et al.  Robust unit commitment problem with demand response and wind energy , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[8]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  A full demand response model in co-optimized energy and reserve market , 2014 .

[9]  J. Watson,et al.  Multi-Stage Robust Unit Commitment Considering Wind and Demand Response Uncertainties , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Yong Fu,et al.  Security-constrained unit commitment with AC constraints , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Masood Parvania,et al.  Demand Response Scheduling by Stochastic SCUC , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Danny H. K. Tsang,et al.  Integrating Price Responsive Demand Into the Unit Commitment Problem , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Takashi Ikegami,et al.  A unit commitment model with demand response for the integration of renewable energies , 2011, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[14]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Demand Response Exchange in the Stochastic Day-Ahead Scheduling With Variable Renewable Generation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[15]  Chris Marnay,et al.  Empirical analysis of the spot market implications ofprice-elastic demand , 2004 .

[16]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Effects of ramp-rate limits on unit commitment and economic dispatch , 1993 .

[17]  K. Palmer,et al.  A Partial Adjustment Model of U.S. Electricity Demand by Region, Season, and Sector , 2009 .

[18]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Hourly demand response in day-ahead scheduling for managing the variability of renewable energy , 2013 .

[19]  Y. Z. Li,et al.  Consumer rationality assumptions in the real-time pricing of electricity , 1991 .

[20]  M. Carrion,et al.  A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Jang-Won Lee,et al.  Residential electricity load scheduling for multi-class appliances with Time-of-Use pricing , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[22]  S. Oren,et al.  A stochastic unit commitment model for integrating renewable supply and demand response , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[23]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Global minimization of indefinite quadratic problems , 1987, Computing.

[24]  Mohsen Kia,et al.  Simultaneous implementation of optimal Demand Response and security constrained Unit Commitment , 2011, 16th Electrical Power Distribution Conference.

[25]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Optimal real time pricing in an agent-based retail market using a comprehensive demand response model , 2011 .