Aspects on single symbol signaling on the frequency flat Rayleigh fading channel

The optimal single symbol detector on the Rayleigh fading channel computes a functional quadratic form in the time continuous received signal. A drawback is that closed-form solutions of integral equations based on the channel statistics are required. This makes simplified discrete receivers attractive. A class of suboptimal receivers that transforms the received random process to a set of discrete observables is derived. The set of observables constitutes a random vector in a finite dimensional receiver signal space. Given this vector, the maximum likelihood detector computes a quadratic form in the received vector. The discretization implies a loss of information, therefore such a detector is not, in general, optimal given the received time continuous signal. The purpose is, however, to achieve close to optimal performance when the number of observables becomes large. This class of detectors is analyzed using exact error probability calculations, which reveal several interesting properties. The length of the observation interval and the number of discrete observables have significant influences on the error probability when the time variations of the fading process are rapid compared with the symbol duration. By increasing the number of observables, the error floor is lowered, and the implicit diversity order is increased. This implicit diversity arises as soon as more than one observable per symbol interval is used and is a consequence of the information bearing signal being a random process. Matched filter receivers use few discrete observables per symbol interval, and thus suffer from high error floors and low implicit diversity orders on fast fading channels. The error probability is highly dependent on the shapes and durations of the modulator waveforms. For instance, pulses of long duration give lower error probabilities than shorter pulses, and for a certain type of orthogonal waveforms there is no error floor.

[1]  Robert Price,et al.  Optimum detection of random signals in noise, with application to scatter-multipath communication-I , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  David Middleton,et al.  On the detection of stochastic signals in additive normal noise-I , 1957, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Correlation detection of signals perturbed by a random channel , 1960, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  P. Bello,et al.  The Influence of Fading Spectrum on the Binary Error Probabilites of Incoherent and Differentially Coherent Matched Filter Recievers , 1962 .

[5]  W. Walker The Error Performance of A Class of Binary Communications Systems in Fading and Noise , 1964 .

[6]  T. Kadota Optimum reception of binary Gaussian signals , 1964 .

[7]  I. M. Jacobs,et al.  Principles of Communication Engineering , 1965 .

[8]  T. T. Kadota,et al.  On the best finite set of linear observables for discriminating two Gaussian signals , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Robert Spayde Kennedy,et al.  Fading dispersive communication channels , 1969 .

[10]  W. C. Jakes,et al.  Microwave Mobile Communications , 1974 .

[11]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .

[12]  Seymour Stein,et al.  Fading Channel Issues in System Engineering , 1987, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[13]  Michael J. Barrett,et al.  Error Probablity for Optimal and Suboptimal Quadratic Receivers in Rapid Rayleigh Fading Channels , 1987, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[14]  John H. Lodge,et al.  Maximum likelihood sequence estimation of CPM signals transmitted over Rayleigh flat-fading channels , 1990, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[15]  J. Cavers On the validity of the slow and moderate fading models for matched filter detection of Rayleigh fading signals , 1992, Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[16]  P. Mathiopoulos,et al.  Optimal detection of coded differentially encoded QAM and PSK signals with diversity reception in correlated fast Rician fading channels , 1993 .

[17]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An introduction to signal detection and estimation (2nd ed.) , 1994 .

[18]  Edward Shwedyk,et al.  Detection of bandlimited signals over frequency selective Rayleigh fading channels , 1994, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[19]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[20]  Subbarayan Pasupathy,et al.  Innovations-based MLSE for Rayleigh fading channels , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[21]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Communication Systems and Techniques , 1996, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[22]  Umberto Mengali,et al.  Double-filtering receivers for PSK signals transmitted over Rayleigh frequency-flat fading channels , 1996, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[23]  Piero Castoldi,et al.  New recursive formulations of optimal detectors for Rayleigh fading channels , 1996, Proceedings of GLOBECOM'96. 1996 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[24]  Desmond P. Taylor,et al.  Multisampling receivers for uncoded and coded PSK signal sequences transmitted over Rayleigh frequency-flat fading channels , 1996, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[25]  Desmond P. Taylor,et al.  Extended MLSE diversity receiver for the time- and frequency-selective channel , 1997, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[26]  Ulf Hansson Efficient Digital Communication over the Time Continuous Rayleigh Fading Channel , 1997 .

[27]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .